政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/114779
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50929215      線上人數 : 1027
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 會計評論 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/114779


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114779


    題名: 核閱方式與核閱者立場對查核績效之影響
    The Effect of Review Mode and Reviewer Preference on Auditors` Performance
    作者: 杜榮瑞
    林靖傑
    廖容翎
    Duh, Rong-Ruey
    Lin, Ching-Chieh
    關鍵詞: 解釋責任;核閱方式;核閱者立場;查核績效
    Accountability;Review mode;Reviewer preference;Auditor performance
    日期: 2016-07
    上傳時間: 2017-11-15 16:00:57 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文探討查核過程中，核閱方式與核閱者立場等兩種解釋責任對查核績效的聯合影響，是否查核人員在電子核閱下能減少其策略性行為。經以78 位查核人員實驗後發現，在面對面核閱下，若受試者主管傾向懷疑客戶解釋，相對於主管傾向信任客戶，受試者對於應收帳款餘額評以較低程度允當表達，此種策略性態度移轉在電子核閱下並未減輕。此外，在面對面核閱下，懷疑組的受試者比信任組搜尋更多反向（更少正向）的查核證據，在電子核閱下，正向與反向證據量差距縮小。本文認為，核閱方式在查核人員傾向主管立場的行為中，具調節效果，但此調節效果僅存在於過程而非結果的解釋責任。
    This study examines the joint effect on auditor performance of two accountability features in the audit review process: review mode and reviewer preference. It investigates whether the auditors` strategic behavior can be mitigated under the e-mail review mode. Seventy-eight auditors participated in an experiment. Results suggest that, under the face-to-face review mode, auditors whose supervisors are known to be skeptical about client-provided explanations make lower likelihood assessment that the explanations can substantially account for the fluctuation of accounts receivable balance than auditors whose supervisors are known to trust the client-provided explanations. Such attitudinal shift is not reduced under the e-mail review mode. In addition, under the face-to-face review mode, auditors in the skeptical condition search for more opposing (less supporting) audit evidence than those in the credence condition. However, such differences diminish under the e-mail review mode. Our finding suggests that auditors` conformity to the reviewer preference can be moderated by review mode for process accountability but not outcome accountability.
    關聯: 會計評論, 63, 47-76
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6552/JOAR.2016.63.2
    DOI: 10.6552/JOAR.2016.63.2
    顯示於類別:[會計評論] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    63-2.pdf473KbAdobe PDF2432檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋