English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50795372      Online Users : 409
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 會計評論 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/114763


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114763


    Title: 審計人員規劃存貨證據之過程與其判斷之研究
    AN EXAMINATION OF AUDITOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA JUDGMENTS IN PLANNING INVENTORY AUDIT PROCEDURES
    Authors: 林文雄
    Lin, Thomas W.
    Mock, Theodore J.
    Wright, Arnold M.
    Lewis, Merrill T.
    Date: 1991-02
    Issue Date: 2017-11-15 14:55:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 審計的效牢與效果，主要是係取決於所蒐集證據的性質及多寡程度;然而，針對審計人員從事審計規劃時，應如何進行此種複雜之判斷的文獻卻極少。本文以實驗的方式，對41位擁有豐富經驗的審計人員，就其規劃存貨證實測試時所做的判斷加以研究分析。結果顯示審計人員在衡量不同證據時，對審計文獻中曾提及之主要標準的相對重要性，均表現出極高的共識程度。明確地說，審計證據的適切性是最受重視的一項，其次是足夠性及蒐祟證據的成本。電腦決策輔助組較判斷組重視迫切性標準，而不重說成本標準;此差異可由審計時數的分配上得知。電腦決策輔助組比判斷組分配較多的小時數在分析性複核上，較少的小時數觀察存貨的實地盤點。從成本一效益的觀點和最近許多會計師事務所多採用分析性複核的趨勢來看，本文的研究結果顯示出使用電腦決策輔助，將會使審計人員花費較多的時間從事分析性複核，而花較少的時間執行其他類型的審計程序。但是，就本文所採用的研究個索而言(指審計時數的分配)，各受試者間對電腦化多重標單決策輔助的評價，意見卻相當分歧。不通，審計人員卻都相信電腦決策輔助對研究、衡量證據品質的樣準及各種審計程序的效率時，是一項極有價值的工具;此外，他們也認為決策輔助工具相當易於使用。
    The efficiency and effectiveness of an audit depend primarily on the planned nature and extent of evidence, yet there is little research on how auditors make such complex judgments. This study examines the inventory substantive audit evidential planning judgments of 41 experienced auditors in an experimental setting. The results indicate that auditors displayed strong consensus as to the relative importance of key criteria suggested in the professional auditing literature to weigh evidential alternatives. Specifically, competence was considered of greatest concern, followed by sufficiency and cost of gathering the evidence. The computer-assisted decision aid groups placed greater weight on competency criterion and lesser weight on cost criterion than the judgmental groups. Differences were observed concerning the appropriate allocation of audit time. The computer-assisted decision aid groups assigned more hours to analytical procedures and less hours to other tests than the judgmental groups. Considering the promising cost-effectiveness and the recent trend by many accounting firms towards analytical procedures, the findings here suggest that requiring a computerized decision aid may cause auditors to spend more time on analytical procedures and less time on other categories of audit procedures. Finally, auditors believed the computer-assisted decision aid to be a valuable tool to systematically examine and focus upon important evidence criteria. The decision-aid was also seen as relatively easy to use.
    Relation: 會計評論, 25, 56-78
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6552%2fJOAR.1991.25.4
    DOI: 10.6552/JOAR.1991.25.4
    Appears in Collections:[會計評論] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2328View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback