政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/114458
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51588618      線上人數 : 962
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114458


    題名: 態度量表的心理計量學分析：2003年TEDS統獨態度量表的研究
    A Psychometric Analysis of the Attitudinal Scales: A Study of the Attitude toward Unification and Independence from the TEDS 2003 Data
    作者: 黃旻華
    Huang, Min-Hua
    關鍵詞: 政治學方法論;測量理論;心理計量學;統獨態度
    political methodology;measurement theory;psychometrics;unification and independence
    日期: 2006-05
    上傳時間: 2017-11-08 11:10:12 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 政治學者在進行實證分析時，一般都過度輕忽理解測量理論的重要性，導致在測量上有許多問題發生而不自覺，這些問題不見得每一次都會有嚴重的影響，可是一旦發生將從根本上威脅到研究的可信度，使得一篇可能是很好的實證研究失去它原有的價值。本文透過對測量理論原理和核心議題的探討，來強調具備測量理論基礎知識的重要性，並針對五項基本假設，來對於十六種不同統獨量表進行心理計量學的分析。研究發現，任何一項假設都可能左右迴歸分析的結果，甚至在相關係數高達0.995的情況下也是如此，這顯示政治學者在進行測量工作時，應慎重面對測量問題可能對研究成果在科學價值上的減損。
    Political scientists usually pay little attention to the understanding of measurement theories when they conduct a quantitative empirical analysis. This engenders many problems beyond their knowledge. While not every problem has a substantial impact on the research, it may fundamentally threaten the credibility and nullify the achievement once it happens. This article tries to argue the importance of proper understanding on some basic knowledge of measurement theories through a discussion of the principles and nuclear issues. Furthermore, a psychometric analysis of sixteenth different scales, based on five psychometric assumptions, is carried out for the unification-independence attitude. The result indicates each of the five assumptions is possibly influential to the regression analysis, even if the simple correlation of the two scales is as high as 0.995. This finding leads to an important conclusion: political scientists should have a serious discussion about the assumptions of their measurement and evaluate the possible impact which may discredit the scientific value of their research.
    關聯: 選舉研究 , 13(1) , 43-86
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6612%2ftjes.2006.13.01.43-85
    DOI: 10.6612/tjes.2006.13.01.43-85
    顯示於類別:[選舉研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    13(1)(043-086).pdf25246KbAdobe PDF2172檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋