政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/114253
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51568930      在线人数 : 356
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114253


    题名: 「我們是誰，誰是我們」的另徑詮釋
    An Alternative Interpretation of ＂`Who Are we?` / `Who are We?`＂
    作者: 洪世謙
    HUNG, Shih-Chian
    关键词: 生命政治;生命形式;人民;阿岡本;巴迪悟
    Biopolitics;Form-of-Life;People;Agamben;Badiou
    日期: 2017-07
    上传时间: 2017-10-31 15:01:03 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 張鼎國教授在其遺作，《「誰是我們？」／「我們是誰？」》一文中，從「人民」、「共同體」、「科技」、「歷史」等四個脈絡，爬梳了海德格政治哲學的幾個階段和轉折。本文將以第二部份「人民與共同體」為主要發展的脈絡，進一步討論「人民」與「共同體」的概念。就在《誰》文以「誰是我們？」／「我們是誰？」作為思考起點的同時，實際上，我們必須更徹底的問，「我們能否說我們」的這個問題？換言之，若「我們」總是溢出或者難易區辨，我們如何能說我們？或者，換個方式提問，若我們可以說我們，那便必須進一步追問「我們何以成為我們」？與《誰》文不同的是，若《誰》文想要說明的是海德格如何以政治存有論思考人於當代中的處境，本文所要思考的則是，人如何不僅僅是在政治存有論的面向思考如何於當代生存，更能落實於具體的政治實踐面向，也因此可以在存有論中看見具體地人的活動，而此點，便是本文所希望對《誰》文的另一個側寫。本文將從阿岡本的生命形式、巴迪悟的無主體以及洪席耶的他者因等觀點，展開並重探「我們」及其問題。
    Ting-kuo Chang`s paper ＂`Who Are we?`/ `Who are We?`＂ (henceforth ＂Who＂) examines some periods and turns of Heidegger`s political philosophy from four perspectives such as people, community, technology and history. Thus, the present paper attempts to further discuss the two notions-people and community-from the second part of Chang`s paper, titled ＂People and Community.＂ Chang`s ＂Who＂ serves as the point of departure for us, in a more radical manner, to ask, ＂Can we say `we`?＂ In other words, can we still say we if we always exceed or become indistinct? Or can we proceed to ask, ＂How can we become us?＂ if we can say we? Contrary to Chang`s ＂Who＂-a paper that aims to explain how Heidegger ponders over the contemporary situation via political ontology-the present paper aims to consider how the humans does not only think the contemporary existence through political ontology, but also see humans` concrete activity in ontology. As the above point indicates, the paper wishes to offer a profile about ＂Who.＂ The paper attempts to exhibit and rethink the problem of we and its relevant problems from the threads such Agamben`s notion of life-of-form, Badiou`s notion of non-subject and Rancière`s notion of the cause of the other.
    關聯: The National Chengchi University Philosophical Journal
    政治大學哲學學報, 38, 159-196
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    38-4.pdf921KbAdobe PDF2356检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈