 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51576713
Online Users : 928
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113634
|
| Title: | 投票選項模糊下之檢定與分析：2010年高雄市長選舉的不確定性及投票效應
An Analysis of Ambiguous Voting Choice: Electoral Uncertainty in the 2010 Kaohsiung Mayoral Election |
| Authors: | 王鼎銘
郭銘峰
Wang, Ding-ming
Kuo, Ming-feng |
| Keywords: | 模糊參選人;投票不確定性;孔多塞贏家;區別性檢定
Stereotype Logit;candidate ambiguity;voting uncertainty;Condorcet winner;Distinguishability test;Stereotype Logit |
| Date: | 2016-11 |
| Issue Date: | 2017-10-16 17:05:40 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本文以2010年高雄市長選舉為背景，探討選舉過程中候選人的模糊性及選民面對這種不確定性下的投票反應。由於相關實證研究忽視政策立場之外的模糊效果，並囿限於從候選人的角度來解釋，本文因此另闢途徑，透過一系列的統計檢定模式─包括孔多塞贏家(Condorcet winner)的計算、多項勝算對數模型的不相關選項獨立性檢定(IIA test)、Stereotype Logit的區別性檢定(Distinguishability test)等，據以廣泛地鑑別選民投票時的選項模糊性。其中尤為特殊的是運用較少受矚目的Stereotype Logit，並提出當選舉面臨越來越多模糊性的狀況下，該模型將是投票行為研究無法避免使用的統計工具。根據不同模型及檢定數據的分析結果，關於這場選舉的模糊性本文得出幾點結論：第一，這場選戰並未產生絕對的孔多塞輸家，顯示選民對陳菊、楊秋興與黃昭順三位候選人的偏好排列並非井然有序；其次，這幾位候選人對選民而言也非完全相互獨立，檢定結果顯示選民的投票結構會因為參選組合的不同而改變；第三，選民特別無法有效區隔楊秋興與黃昭順這兩位參選人，但陳菊與其他兩人之間則沒有這種模糊定位的問題，換言之當年楊秋興退黨參選主要是影響泛藍的選票。
This paper, based on the 2010 Kaohsiung mayoral election, explores candidate ambiguity during the campaign and the corresponding voting behavior under a veil of uncertainty. Current research limits the ambiguity to the candidate`s unclear policy standpoints and disregards the notion that the ambiguity may simply reside in the voters` own uncertainty. To relieve these constraints, several statistical examinations, including estimating the Condorcet winner, the IIA test under Multinomial Logit, and the Distinguishability test under Stereotype Logit, are proposed to observe how voters directly respond to ambiguity. Among those, Stereotype Logit is especially emphasized and is anticipated to be the most fitting choice model to estimate voting behavior under uncertainty. According to the estimation results, there is couple ambiguity observed in this mayoral election: First, despite the outcome of Chen Chu as the Condorcet winner, there is no defined Condorcet loser in this campaign. It indicates that voters` preferences are not completely organized and transitive. Second, candidates in this election are not mutually independent from the voter`s perspective. People are likely to respond differently if one of the candidates stops the campaign based on the test results. Third, it is especially difficult for voters to distinguish between Yang Chiu-hsing and Huang Chao-shun. Chen Chu, on the other hand, has no ambiguity concern with the other candidates. This paper substantiates that Yang Chiu-hsing, defected from the DPP, mainly to attract pan KMT ballots. |
| Relation: | 選舉研究 , 23(2) , 87-122 |
| Data Type: | article |
| DOI 連結: | http://dx.doi.org/10.6612%2ftjes.2016.23.02.87-122 |
| DOI: | 10.6612/tjes.2016.23.02.87-122 |
| Appears in Collections: | [選舉研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 23(2)(087-122)A.pdf | | 1595Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 571 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
