政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/113510
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50969244      線上人數 : 910
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/113510


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113510


    題名: 通訊隱私與刑法規制—論通訊保障及監察法的刑事責任
    Communications Privacy and Criminal Regulation-Research on Criminal Liability of "Communication Security and Surveillance Act"
    作者: 許恒達
    Hsu, Heng-Da
    貢獻者: 法律系
    關鍵詞: 通訊監察;合理隱私期待;通訊隱私;侵入電腦;秘密利益;虛偽朋友
    Communication Surveillance;Reasonable Expectation of Privacy;Communications Privacy;Computer Intrusion;Secret Interest;False Friend
    日期: 2010-01
    上傳時間: 2017-10-11 15:48:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 科技持續發展的今天，新興的法律管制領域愈益增加。「通訊行動」的保護，在科技時代尤為重要的法律議題。我國早於1999年增訂通訊保障及監察法，採用美國法取向「隱私保護」的立法架構，同時創設「違法通訊監察」與「洩露監察資料」的刑事責任，然而，這種仿傚美國法的刑事制裁，如何能與我國法的體例相契合，即為應予深究的問題。筆者將在本文中，借鏡美國與德國的立法現況與實務意見，深入研究通保法刑法規範的解釋方法，並設法將其刑責融入我國刑法法益保護體系。本文將分為五個主題說明相關疑義：(1)如何設計通訊隱私的刑法保護架構、(2)如何類型化通訊隱私的保護客體、(3)如何定性通訊監察行為、(4)洩露與交付行為的可罰性界限，以及如何解釋通保法中的除罪事由。
    The technological advance and improvement lead to many new legal issues. The protection of ”communication activities” is one of the most important topics. By adopting the main conception of ”privacy protection” in American legislation, Taiwan has already enacted the Communication Security and Surveillance Act (CSSA) in 1999. Under CSSA, the unlawful surveillance and disclosure of communication privacy are punishable. However, whether CSSA`s penalties could be suitable for Taiwan`s legal system which is influenced by Germany`s theories would be a core point to be concentrated. The author will explore these problems in view of American and German criminal law and practice. The following discussion in this article will be divided into five main topics:
    (1)How can we build a criminal law’s structure to protect communication privacy?
    (2)What kind of communication activities should be legally protected?
    (3)Which invasion of communications privacy are punishable?
    (4)What kind of conduct could be deemed as ”disclosure of communication privacy”?
    (5)How can we interpret the exculpation grounds regulated in CSSA?
    關聯: 東吳法律學報, Vol.21, No.3, pp.109-159
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    159.pdf1732KbAdobe PDF2313檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋