English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113313/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50946452      Online Users : 949
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/113492


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113492


    Title: 「原因自由行為」的刑事責任
    Criminal Liability of “Actio Libera in Causa
    Authors: 許恒達
    Hsu, Heng-Da
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 原因自由行為;構成要件模式;例外模式;因果關係;責任關聯
    actio libera in causa;Tatbestandsmodell;Ausnahmemodell;Kausalzusammenhang;Verschuldungszusammenhang
    Date: 2010-06
    Issue Date: 2017-10-11 11:55:22 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文探討我國刑法於2005 年增訂第19 條第3 項後，「原因自由行為」（actio libera in causa），在德國刑法理論與我國實證法規定的雙重脈絡下，應該如何判定其刑責的問題。有別於通說採行「構成要件模式」，並前置構成要件行為至原因行為時點的見解，本文主張「例外模式」，犯行時點應該保留在結果行為時點，原因自由行為僅涉及責任能力的問題，與主觀歸責無關，亦即：只要成立原因自由行為，應依刑法第19 條第3 項「排除適用」責任減免事由。不過，本文不完全贊同德國例外模式的學說見解，主張應該更嚴格地，判定原因行為與責任能力障礙狀態下實施之結果行為間的關聯性，這種關聯性可分為「客觀因果關係」與「主觀責任關聯」。
    This article explores the criminal liability of actio libera in causa in light of German criminal law theories and Article 19 Section 3 of Taiwan’s Penal Code amended by Legislative Yuan in 2005. In contrast to the “Offense Condition Model” (Tatbestandsmodell) which argues that the conduct time point of the alleged crimes should be moved forward to actio praecedens, the author advocates the “Exception Model” (Ausnahmemodell), claiming that it is not actio praecedens, but actio subsequens which constitutes a crime. In terms of actio libera in causa, it has nothing to do with time point of conduct. The real issue is the abolition of insanity defense, i.e., once if an offender commits a crime by means of actio libera in causa, the insanity defense cannot be permitted. However, the author modifies the original theory of Exception Model, and suggests that the objective causality and subjective responsibility relationship between actio praecedens and actio subsequens ought to be strictly established.
    Relation: 台大法學論叢, Vol.39, No.2, pp.351-431
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6199%2fNTULJ.2010.39.02.13
    DOI: 10.6199/NTULJ.2010.39.02.13
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35131.pdf2482KbAdobe PDF2377View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback