政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/113310
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51082045      Online Users : 896
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113310


    Title: 財富分配不均與財富組成—以遺產稅申報資料為例
    Wealth inequality and wealth composition—evidence from estate tax returns
    Authors: 伍大開
    Contributors: 陳國樑
    伍大開
    Keywords: 財富分配不均
    財富組成
    遺產稅
    Wealth inequality
    Wealth composition
    Estate tax
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-10-02 10:20:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文藉由 2001 年至 2015 年遺產稅申報資料，並利用死亡率倒數法將死亡者的遺產，還原推算在世者財富分配情形，分析臺灣財富分配不均及財富組成情形，發現財富分配不均程度近年來逐漸增加，與金融資產集中於富人相關；除此之外，財富集中得分配不均情形，不僅發生在貧富之間，單就富人族群，也可觀察到財富集中化的現象。另一方面，財富組成部分則觀察到，相較於不動產與其他非金融資產，國人逐漸偏好金融資產，其可能原因在於，遺產稅有效稅率下降，減少持有不動產以規避租稅的誘因。雖然金融資產占財富總額比例增加，但土地仍為國人主要持有財產。
    本文另外以迴歸模型探討遺產稅有效稅率與財富組成的關係，其結果顯示，遺產稅有效稅率對於土地占財富總額比例為顯著正相關，對於存款與投資占財富總額比例則為顯著負相關，代表個體面對較高的租稅負擔，傾向利用稅制之下土地評價低估的方式獲取租稅利益。稅制扭曲個人對於資產種類的選擇，也影響個體資產配置的決策。
    Based on estate tax returns from 2001 to 2015 and using the estate multiplier method to blow up the sample of decedents to represent the number of livings, this pa-per analyzes wealth inequality and wealth composition in Taiwan. The results suggest that the degree of wealth inequality has gradually increased in recent years, in accord-ance with the observation that financial assets became more concentrated in the rich. In addition, the concentration of wealth and the resulting inequality is not only between the rich and the poor, it also happens within the group of the rich. On the other hand, in wealth composition, the results suggest the tendency of holding more financial assets as opposed to real estates and other non-financial assets. One of the possible explanations is that the decreasing effective tax rate of the estate tax reduces incentives to hold real estates for tax benefits. Despite the increasing in the proportion of financial assets, land is still the major choice of property holdings as measured by the ratio of wealth.
    The second part of the study uses regression analyses to explore the relationship between the effective tax rate (of the estate tax) and the composition of wealth. Results show that the estate tax effective rate is positively correlated with the ratio of land to total wealth, and negatively correlated with the ratio of deposit and investment. These results represent that when facing a higher tax burden, individuals tend to take ad-vantage of the undervaluing of land in the current tax system to obtain tax benefits. This adds to existing evidence that tax distorts individuals’ choice of asset types, and affects individuals’ decisions on asset allocation.
    Reference: 財政部賦稅署 (2012)，「財政部對於司法院釋字第705號解釋捐地列舉扣除金額認定標準違憲之說明」，財政部賦稅署 (2012/11/22)，取自
    http://www.dot.gov.tw/dot/home.jsp?mserno=200912140005&serno=200912140018&menudata=DotMenu&contlink=ap/news_view.jsp&dataserno=201211220000.。
    陳慧圈 (1997)，《影響台灣所得分配之因素的探討—兼論台灣的財富分配》，國立中正大學國際經濟研究所博士論文。
    銀慶貞、陶宏麟與洪嘉瑜 (2012)，「補習對考大學真的有用嗎？」，《經濟論文叢刊》，40，頁73–118。
    蔡文松 (2005)，《財富分配之理論研析與實際-以台灣國富調查為例》，國立政治大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
    Alesina, A. and D. Rodrik (1994), “Distributive Politics and Economic Growth,” Quar-terly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 465–490.
    Atkinson, A. B. (1975), “The Distribution of Wealth in Britain in the 1960s - the Estate Duty Method Reexamined,” in J. D. Smith (ed.), the Personal Distribution of In-come and Wealth, 277–319, New York: Columbia University Press.
    Atkinson, A. B. (1997), “Bringing Income Distribution in from the Cold,” The Eco-nomic Journal, 107(441), 297–321.
    Dabla-Norris, E., K. Kochhar, F. Ricka, N. Suphaphiphat, and E. Tsounta, (2015), Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality: A Global Perspective, Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
    Feldstein, M. (1976), “Personal Taxation and Portfolio Composition: An Econometric Analysis,” Econometrica, 44(4), 631–650.
    Galor, O. and J. Zeira (1993), “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics,” The Review of Economic Studies, 60(1), 35–52.
    Heckman, J. J. (1979), “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error,” Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.
    Hubbard, R. G. (1985), “Personal Taxation, Pension Wealth, and Portfolio Composition,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(1), 53–60.
    Johnson, B., B. Raub, and J. Newcomb. (2010), “A Comparison of Wealth Estimates for America’s Wealthiest Decedents Using Tax Data and Data from The Forbes 400,” paper presented at Annual Conference of the National Tax Association, Chicago, November 18–20.
    Keister, L. A. and S. Moller (2000), “Wealth Inequality in the United States,” Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 63–81.
    King, M. A. and J. I. Leape (1998), “Wealth and Portfolio Composition: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Public Economics, 69(2), 155–193.
    Kopczuk, W. (2015), “What Do We Know about the Evolution of Top Wealth Shares in the United States,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(1), 47–66.
    Kopczuk, W. and E. Saez (2004), “Top Wealth Shares in the United States, 1916–2000: Evidence from Estate Tax Returns,” National Tax Journal, 57(2), 445–488.
    Lazear, E. P. and S. Rosen (1981), “Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Con-tracts,” Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841–864.
    Lucas, R. E. (2004), “The Industrial Revolution: Past and Future,” Annual Report of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 5–20.
    Mallet, B. (1908), “A Method of Estimating Capital Wealth from Estate Duty Statis-tics,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 71(1), 65–101.
    OECD (2015), In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All, Paris: OECD Publishing.
    OECD (2016), Tax Policy Reforms in the OECD 2016, Paris: OECD Publishing.
    Piketty, T., G. Postel-Vinay and J. L. Rosenthal (2006), “Wealth Concentration in a De-veloping Economy: Paris and France, 1807–1994,” American Economic Review, 96(1), 236–256.
    Saez, E. (2006), “Income and Wealth Concentration in a Historical and International Perspective,” in A. J. Auerbach, D. Card, and J. M. Quigley (eds.), Public Policy and the Income Distribution, 221–258, New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
    Saez, E. and G. Zucman (2014), “Wealth Inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data,” NBER Working Paper, No. 20625.
    Sandmo, A. (2013), “the Principal Problem in Political Economy: Income Distribution in the History of Economic Thought”, in A. B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution, 3–62, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
    Wolff, E. N. (1995), “The Rich Get Increasingly Richer: Latest Data on Household Wealth during the 1980s,” in R.E. Ratcliff, M.L. Oliver, and T.M. Shapiro (eds.), Research in Politics and Society, 33–68, Greenwich: JAI Press.
    Wolff, E. N. (1998), “Recent Trends in the Size Distribution of Household Wealth,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 131–150.
    Wooldridge, J. M. (1995), “Score diagnostics for linear models estimated by two stage least squares,” in G. S. Maddala, C. B. Phillips, and T. N. Srinivasan (eds.), Ad-vances in Econometrics and Quantitative Economics: Essays in Honor of Professor C. R. Rao, 66–87, Oxford: Wiley.
    Wooldridge, J. M. (2002), Economic Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cam-bridge: MIT Press.
    Rosen, H. S. and T. Gayer (2014), Public Finance, New York: McGraw-Hill Education Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    104255015
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1042550151
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Public Finance] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    015101.pdf1129KbAdobe PDF293View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback