政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/112818
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113478/144464 (79%)
造访人次 : 51488530      在线人数 : 725
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112818


    题名: 企業策略與國家文化對跨國購併之影響 : 以鴻海購併夏普為例
    The Influence of Corporate Strategy and National Culture on Cross-Border M&A
    作者: 王靖傑
    WANG, CHING-CHIEH
    贡献者: 林月雲
    Lin, Yeh-Yun
    王靖傑
    CHING-CHIEH WANG
    关键词: 鴻海
    夏普
    購併
    併購
    文化
    國家文化
    企業策略
    談判
    Hon-Hai
    Sharp
    M&A
    Culture
    National culture
    Corporate strategy
    Negotiation
    日期: 2017
    上传时间: 2017-09-13 15:56:31 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 跨國購併為企業持續成長的重要策略之一，學者針對此議題亦有諸多探討， 而過去的多數研究皆著重於—企業執行跨國購併後，企業策略與國家文化對於後 續整合的影響。然而，本研究認為文化的影響自企業開啟跨國購併談判以來，便 始終存在。此外，購併談判為跨國購併之起始，其重要性不亞於購併後的整合。 因此，本研究以企業跨國購併歷程為主體，藉此探討跨國購併企業雙方之文化差 異對於整體購併行為之影響。
    本研究之目的為探討企業實際購併個案研究，讓企業未來在實際執行購併策 略時，能持續思考國家文化差異之影響，並依據其購併階段之不同，而有相對的 因應方式。
    本研究以次級資料作為質性研究依據，藉由廣泛地蒐集資料，撰寫成鴻海購 併夏普之跨國購併個案。透過此篇實際個案研究，發現家文化差異對於企業能否 順利進行購併談判有重大影響，並提出企業依其所屬之購併階段不同，處理相對 應需著重之文化構面，可提高企業跨國購併談判之效率及成功率。
    Cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are one of the most important strategies for sustainable growth of a company. Many scholars had various discussions on this issue. Most of researches concentrated on how corporate strategy and national culture affect the integration after cross-border M&A.
    However, this study suggests that cultural impacts have long existed from the very beginning of cross-border M&A negotiations. In addition, M&A negotiation is the start point of cross-border M&A. It is equally important in the integration stage after M&A. Therefore, this study focuses mainly on the process of cross-border M&A in order to explore overall influence on the cross-border M&A due to cultural differences between the enterprises.
    By analyzing a real M&A case, the purpose of this study is to make enterprise consider the impact of cultural difference when they are having cross-border M&A negotiation. Besides, through this study company can understand what the most important dimension of national culture is while having M&A project.
    This study is a qualitative research based on extensively searching secondary data of Hon-Hai and Sharp M&A. This case study found that cultural differences between nations affect -whether the enterprise can successfully carry out M&A negotiations. This study also shows that company may generate different strategies corresponding to the difference between national culture dimensions in accordance with different M&A negotiation stage. Doing so may lead to smooth and successful M&A negotiation.
    參考文獻: 中文文獻
    中田行彥（2016）。鴻海為什麼贏得夏普（林佑純、奈勻、洪淳瀅與程永佳譯）。台灣：商業周刊。
    日本經濟新聞社（2016）。夏普崩壞: 是誰搞垮了名門企業?（劉滌昭、許明煌譯）。春天出版國際。
    王克萍（2004）。企業跨國購併策略之研究-以電子零組件通路商為例。臺灣大學國際企業學研究所。
    王毓雯（2012）。當武士遇上狐狸。商業周刊，1294，頁 58-66。
    王毓雯（2016）。郭董為何苦追錢坑夏普。商業周刊，1477，頁 98-100。
    伍忠賢（2013）。企業購併: 理論與實務。新陸出版。
    吳和懋（2016）。黑盒子、傀儡社長⋯⋯夏普竟是被自己人鬥垮。商業周刊，1477，頁 102-105。
    宋煥鑫（2012）。鴻海與夏普結盟的策略研究。臺灣大學企業管理碩士專班。
    杉本Ryuko（2014）。《東洋經濟週刊》獨家授權 還原三小時專訪 不再忍 郭台銘自爆鴻夏戀始末。今周刊，913，頁 62-66。
    李秉穎（2011）。探討鴻海全球空間資源佈局的軌跡。清華大學科技管理研究所。
    李春南（2000）。電信產業購併策略之研究。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)。
    邱冠斌、邱冠燿、陳金花 （2012）。 能源光電LED產業政策與競爭策略之研究[A Study of the Industrial Policy and Competitive Strategies of Taiwan`s LED Industry]。中華行政學報（10），頁 173-199。
    施振榮（1996）。再造宏碁: 開創、成長與挑戰。台灣：天下文化出版股份有限公司。
    張殿文（2005）。虎與狐。台灣：天下文化。
    陳良榕、黃亦筠、嚴珮華（2016）。霸氣總裁　如何苦追沒落貴族？。天下雜誌，592，頁 100-107。
    陳芃婷（2003）。鴻海企業經營策略之研究。國立交通大學科技管理所。
    曾如瑩（2016a）。台日製造黃金交叉。商業周刊，1482，頁 85-93。
    曾如瑩（2016b）。狐狸戰爭。商業周刊，1477，頁 88-97。
    黃亦筠、陳良榕（2016）。夏普兩大傳家寶　鴻海非要不可。天下雜誌，592，頁 108-109。
    楊仲瑜、周士雄 （2016）。鴻海收購夏普案對台日產業合作影響。資策會研究報告。台灣：財團法人資訊工業策進會產業情報研究所(MIC)。
    萬惠雯（2005）。通路商企業購併之財務評價探討─以遠傳購併全虹為例。臺灣大學國家發展研究所。
    葉銀華（2016）。解析鴻夏戀。會計研究月刊（365），頁 21-25。

    英文文獻
    Barkema, H. G., John Hj, B., & Pennings, J. M. (1996). FOREIGN ENTRY, CULTURAL BARRIERS, AND LEARNING. Strategic Management Journal (1986-1998), 17(2), 151.
    Bhagat, R. S., Kedia, B. L., Harveston, P. D., & Triandis, H. C. (2002). Cultural variations in the cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: An integrative framework. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 204-221.
    Brouthers, K. D., van Hastenburg, P., & van den Ven, J. (1998). If most mergers fail why are they so popular? Long Range Planning, 31(3), 347-353. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)80002-2
    Buckley, P., & Casson, M. (1976). THE FUTURE OF THE MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISE. London: Macmillan.
    Calori, R., Lubatkin, M., & Very, P. (1994). Control Mechanisms in Cross-border Acquisitions: An International Comparison. Organization Studies, 15(3), 361-379. doi:doi:10.1177/017084069401500303
    Cavusgil, S. T., & Knight, G. A. R. J. R. (2008). International business : strategy, management and the new realities: Upper saddle River.
    Dickson, M. W., Den Hartog, D. N., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2003). Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 729-768. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.002
    Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories From Case Study Research. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532.
    Elgers, P. T., & Clark, J. J. (1980). Merger Types and Shareholder Returns: Additional Evidence. Financial Management (pre-1986), 9(2), 66.
    Hennart, J.-F. (1988). A Transaction Costs Theory Of Equity Joint Ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 361.
    Hitt, M. A., & Pisano, V. (2003). THE CROSS-BORDER MERGER AND ACQUISITION STRATEGY: A Research Perspective. Management Research, 1(2), 133-144.
    Hofstede, G. (1983). The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75.
    Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations - software of the mind: McGraw-Hill.
    Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture`s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations: Sage.
    Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4.
    Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations. New York, USA, UNITED STATES: McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing.
    Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture`s consequences, international differences in work-related values: Sage Publications.
    Jandt, F. E. (2012). An Introduction to Intercultural Communication: Identities in a Global Community: SAGE Publications.
    Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988a). The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432.
    Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988b). The Effect Of National Culture On The Choice Of Entry Mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411.
    Kraemer, K. L., Greg Linden, and Jason Dedrick. (2011). Capturing Value in Global Networks: Apple’s iPad and iPhone. Retrieved from USA:
    Marks, M. L. (1991). Merger management HR`s way. HRMagazine : on human resource management, 36(5), 60-62, 66.
    Morosini, P., Scott, S., & Singh, H. (1998). National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 137-158.
    Morosini, P., & Singh, H. (1994). Post-cross-border acquisitions: Implementing ‘national culture-compatible’ strategies to improve performance. European Management Journal, 12(4), 390-400. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(94)90025-6
    Perriello, B. (2007). Successfully integrating an acquisition. Industrial Distribution, 96(2), 34.
    Schramm, W. (1971). Notes on Case Studies of Instructional Media Projects. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/64109491?accountid=14229
    Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kâğitçibaşi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85-119, Chapter xix, 338 Pages): Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA.
    Singh, N., & Matsuo, H. (2004). Measuring cultural adaptation on the web: a content analytic study of U.S. and Japanese web sites. Journal of business research, 57(8), 864-872.
    Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339-358.
    Soares, A. M., Farhangmehr, M., & Shoham, A. (2007). Hofstede`s dimensions of culture in international marketing studies. Journal of business research, 60(3), 277-284. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.018
    Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive Culture: Researches Into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom: J. Murray.
    Vaara, E. (2000). Constructions of Cultural Differences in Post-Merger Change Processes: A Sensemaking Perspective on Finnish-Swedish Cases. M@n@gement, 3(3), 81-110.
    Vaara, E. (2003). Post-acquisition integration as sensemaking: Glimpses of ambiguity, confusion, hypocrisy, and politicization. The Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 859.
    Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. (2001). Learning through acquistions. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 457-476.
    Weston, J. F., Siu, J. A., & Johnson, B. A. (2001). Takeovers, restructuring, and corporate governance: Prentice Hall.
    Whitley, P. R. (1992). European Business Systems: Firms and Markets in Their National Contexts: Sage Publications (CA).
    Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods: SAGE Publications.

    網站
    行政院國家發展委員，http://www.ndc.gov.tw/News7.aspx?n=5F5662157BC98A7D
    工商時報電子資料庫，http://www.digitimes.com.tw/
    聯合知識資料庫，https://udndata.com/
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    104363008
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104363008
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[企業管理研究所（MBA學位學程）] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    300801.pdf1307KbAdobe PDF25081检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈