Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112764
|
Title: | 中國大陸課稅努力的影響因素―以空間計量模型分析 Determinants of Tax Effort of China—A Spatial Econometric Analysis |
Authors: | 林濰雅 Lin, Wei Ya |
Contributors: | 黃智聰 林濰雅 Lin, Wei Ya |
Keywords: | 課稅努力 書記任期年數 空間計量模型 租稅能力 Tax effort Provincial secretary tenure Spatial econometric model Total taxable capacity |
Date: | 2017 |
Issue Date: | 2017-09-13 15:22:33 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 全世界有許多國家正面臨嚴峻的財政赤字危機,中國大陸也無法幸免於難,因此如何增加財政收入和減少財政赤字實為重要的全球議題,更是中國大陸近年來應當重視的問題。在增加財政收入方面,課稅努力不失為一種可靠的方法,過去也不乏探討課稅努力影響因素的文獻。但以往文獻在沒考慮到空間相關性的情況下,只使用傳統線性迴歸模型或是普通的固定效果模型去作實證分析。故本文納入了空間相關性的因素,用空間計量模型去分析各種變數對課稅努力的影響,以彌補過去研究因為缺少考慮空間相關性而產生的謬誤。 本文研究1997年至2015年的課稅努力影響因素,在選擇空間計量模型前先進行Wald檢定,得到隨機效果的空間杜賓模型為最適用於本篇研究的結論。實證結果發現,在不同課稅努力的衡量標準下,對其有影響的因素也不盡相同。總的來說,經濟發展程度、工業化程度和貿易開放程度提高會促進課稅努力;反之,書記任期和書記虛擬變數對課稅努力則有顯著的負向影響。 最後,本文認為地方政府政策應隨課稅努力衡量方式不同而訂立相異的經濟或財政政策,方能確實得到政府希冀的效果。 Many countries including China are facing severe fiscal problems, hence raising fiscal revenues and reducing fiscal expenses are top issues to the whole world. As for raising revenues, tax effort would be a feasible way. Though many literatures considered about this factor, few of them took spatial autocorrelation into account. This study uses a spatial econometric analysis to investigate determinants of tax effort in China, in the hope of mitigating estimation biases due to the lack of considering spatial autocorrelation. This study uses China’s provincial-level panel data of 31 provinces from 1997 to 2015 to estimate empirical models. After executing Wald test, it is found that the spatial durbin model (SDM) is the most suitable model for this panel data. The empirical results differ due to different tax effort measurements. In general, economic growth, industrialization level, and trade openness will enhance the local government’s tax effort in China. On the contrary, tenure of provincial secretary and dummy variable of secretary change will decrease the local government’s tax effort in China. This study thus suggests that the China’s local governments should make different economic and fiscal policies based on different measurements of tax effort, and then they will reach their goals of improving fiscal situation. |
Reference: | 1.王崢、周全林(2014),「地方政府預算外收入與財政努力研究」,《當代財經》(江西),第十二期,頁28-35。 2.王陸進(1995),「論稅收潛力與課稅努力」,《稅務研究》(北京),第六期,頁9-13。 3.周黎安(2007),「中國地方官員的晉升錦標賽模式研究」,《經濟研究》(北京),第七期,頁36-50。 4.周曉慧、鄒肇芸(2014),「經濟增長、政府財政收支與地方官員任期 —來自省級的經驗證據」,《經濟社會體制比較》(北京),第六期,頁112-125。 5.林健次、蔡吉源(2003),「地方財政自我負責機制與財政收支劃分」,《公共行政學報》(台北),第九期,頁1-33。 6.胡立諄、賴進貴(2006),「臺灣女性癌症的空間分析」,《臺灣地理資訊學刊》(台北),第四期,頁39-55。 7.孫玉棟、張洪祿(2003),「關於我國稅收收入規模增長的實證分析」,《哈爾濱商業大學學報:社會科學版》(黑龍江),第五期,頁8-10。 8.秦強(2013),「財政分權體制下的地方財政:努力傾向與影響因素」,《貴州財經大學學報》(貴州),第四期,頁17-24。 9.張曄、劉志彪(2005),「產業趨同:地方官員行為的經濟學分析」,《經濟學家》(四川),第六卷第六期,頁62-67。 10.陳慈仁(2001),《臺北市資訊軟體業與網際網路服務業區位分佈之研究》。臺北:國立臺灣大學建築城鄉研究所未發表碩士論文。 11.陳德球、陳運森、董志勇(2016),「政策不確定性、稅收征管強度與企業稅收規避」,《管理世界》(北京),第五期,頁151-163。 12.曾巨威、羅白櫻、廖如敏(2001),《如何透過中央統籌分配稅款及補助款之分配激勵地方政府開闢財源》。台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會研究計畫。 13.黃建興、蔡玉時(2002),「建立激發地方政府努力之機制」,《經濟研究》(台北),第二期,頁33-52。 14.黃紹東(2004),《台南市東區住宅價格之空間自我迴歸分析》。臺南:國立成功大學都市計劃研究所未發表碩士論文。 15.賈智蓮、盧洪友(2009),「稅收努力、環境差異與地方政府財政汲取能力—基於中國省級資料的實證研究」,《財經論叢》(浙江),第五期,頁 26-33。 16.劉鳳偉(2007),「論財政轉移支付對地方財政努力的影響—以甘肅省縣級數據為例」,《地方財政研究》(遼寧),第十二期,頁 24-27。 17.賴麗仙(2003),《估測我國財政能力與租稅努力之研究》。臺中:逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所未發表碩士論文。 18.魏婕、許璐、任保平(2016),「財政偏向激勵、地方政府行為和經濟增長質量」,《經濟科學》(北京),第三期,頁5-18。 19.Alm, J., J. Martinez-Vazquez, and F. Schneider (2004), “Sizing the Problem of the Hard-to-Tax.” Contributions to Economic Analysis, 268, 11-75. 20.Bahl, Roy (1999), “Fiscal Decentralization as Development Policy.” Public Budgeting & Finance, 19(2), 59-75. 21.Bird, R.M., J. Martinez-Vazquez, and B. Torgler (2004), “Societal Institutions and Tax Effort in Developing Countries.” Working Paper, University of Toronto. 22.Compson, M and J. Navratil (1997), “An Improved Method for Estimating the Total Taxable Resources of the States.” Research Paper 97-02, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Washington, D.C. 23.Elhorst, J.P. (2010), “Matlab Software for Spatial Panels.” International Regional Science Review, 37(3), 389–405. 24.Eltony, Nagy (2002), “The Determinants of Tax Effort in Arab Countries.” Arab Planning Institute Working Paper 207. 25.Hausman, J.A. (1978), “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271. 26.Huang, Jr-Tsung, Kuang-Ta Lo, and Po-Wen She (2012), “The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Tax Effort of China`s Local Governments After the Tax Sharing System.” The Singapore Economic Review, 57(01), 1250005-1-1250005-22. 27.Knight, J. and L. Shi (1999), “Fiscal Decentralization: Incentives, Redistribution and Reform in China.” Oxford Development Studies, 27(1), 5–32. 28.LeSage, J.P., and R.K. Pace (2009), Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. (Statistics, textbooks and monographs). London: CRC Press. 29.Lotz, Jørgen R. and Elliott R. Morss (1967), “Measuring “Tax Effort” in Developing Countries.” International Monetary Staff Papers, 14(3), 478-499. 30.Martinez-Vazquez, J. and L.F. Boex (1997), “An Analysis of Alternative Measures of Fiscal Capacity for The Regions of the Russian Federation.” International Studies Program Working Paper, 97-4. 31.Mobley, L.R., H. Frech, and L. Anselin (2009), “Spatial Interaction, Hospital Pricing and Hospital Antitrust.” International Journal of the Economics of Business, 16(1), 1-17. 32.Piancastelli, Marcelo (2001), “Measuring the Tax Effort of Developed and Developing Countries: Cross Country Panel Data Analysis-1985/95.” IPEA Working Paper, No. 818. 33.Qian, Y.Y. and C.G. Xu (1993),”Why China’s Economic Reforms Differ: the M-form Hierarchy and Entry/Expansion of The Non-State Sector.” The Economics of Transition, 1(2), 135-170. 34.Shin, K. (1969), “International Difference in Tax Ratio.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 213-220. 35.Stotsky, M.J.G. and M.A.WoldeMariam (1997), “Tax Effort in Sub-Saharan Africa.” International Monetary Fund Working Paper, No. 97-107. 36.Wang, Q., C. Shen, and H. F. Zou (2009), “Local Governments Tax Effort in China: An Analysis of Provincial Tax Performance.” Région et Développement, 29, 203 -236. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 財政學系 104255013 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1042550131 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [財政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|