Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112736
|
Title: | 從校務研究出發探討政治大學大學生的資訊系統需求 A Study of Undergraduates` Perspectives on the Function Needs of Student Information System at Chengchi University |
Authors: | 蕭明倫 Hsiao, Ming Lung |
Contributors: | 朱斌妤 Chu, Pin-Yu 蕭明倫 Hsiao, Ming Lung |
Keywords: | 校務研究 學生資訊系統 大學生需求 Institutional research Student information systems Undergraduate students` needs |
Date: | 2017 |
Issue Date: | 2017-09-13 15:12:43 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 在高等教育中,資訊為決策制定和決策支援系統的核心,本研究欲探討在決策支援系統的情境之下,高等教育院校學生對於校務資料系統的使用需求,欲了解當使用者為政大的大學生時,學生對於校務資料系統的資訊需求,目的在於將學生的意見作為未來在建置之校務資料系統的參考,明確指引該系統建置的目標和方向。 臺灣高等教育目前在面對內部和外部環境的諸多困境,建立完備的校務資料系統並妥善運作之,有其必要性。但是,現行的校務研究大部分著重於既有資料的分析與決策制定,而非聚焦於校務平台使用者的需求調查,故本研究藉由相關的文獻回顧、焦點座談,以及深度訪談的方式,了解校務資料系統的使用者為政治大學大學生時的需求層面,以及此些層面中,具體的資訊和功能內容。 奠基於研究過程,本研究發現政大在校的大學生在校務系統中至少有四大層面的需求,分別為:校內課業、課外活動、就業資訊和財務資訊層面,而對應於此四項層面則有十個次面向的具體資訊和功能的需求。依據研究結果:(1)未來平台的設計可依據現有的分類可再細緻化、(2)加強相同或似系統之間的連結、(3)設置校務平台各系統的資訊地圖、(4)平台設計與使用者需求應符合、(5)增設雙向互動的功能;再者,可增加其他利害關係人對於校務平台使用需求的探詢、以訪談結果為基礎的問卷設計,並且在每次改善或完成校務資料系統後,進行使用者滿意度調查。 Information is the core of decision-making and Decision Support System in higher education. This research’s objective is to understand National Chengchi University’s undergraduate students’ needs for student information systems (student administrative systems), in the context of decision making system. The purpose is to use students’ opinions as references, goals and directions for the enhancement of student information system (SIS). Higher Education in Taiwan is confronted by numerous challenges from both internal and external environments. These pressures augment the necessity for the creation and operation of complete and functional SISs. However, current research on SISs mostly focus on analyzing available data and decision-making, rather than surveying SIS users’ needs. This research attempts to understand undergraduate students’ needs for National Chengchi University’s SIS, and the specific informational and functional aspects of those needs, through the review of related literatures, focus groups, and in-depth interviews. The results of this study reveal at least four aspects of undergraduate students’ needs for the use of National Chengchi University SIS, these include: academic courses, extracurricular activities, career information and finance information. Within these aspects, there are ten secondary dimensions matching specific informational and functional needs. According to the research results, the following suggestions can be derived: (1) the design of SISs in the future should be further refined in accordance with current categories; (2) connection between same or similar systems should be enhanced; (3) information maps for all SISs should be created; (4) the design of the SISs should be consistent with user needs; (5) two-way interaction functions should be increased. Future research should attempt to, explore the needs of additional SIS stakeholders, design and conduct surveys based on the research results of this study, create and implement user satisfaction surveys after the completion of every SIS improvement. |
Reference: | 一、英文部分 Alford, H. & Aharonian, A. (2011). What is institutional research? Retrieved from http://www.rupp.edu.kh/news/kiyo/hash-2014-rupp_3_addition__ir_by_alford.pdf Bresfelean, V. P. , & Ghisoiu, N. (2009). Higher education decision making and decision support systems. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education , 7(2) , 43-52. Glover, R. (2009). Strengthening institutional research and information technology capacity through achieving the dream: Pinciples and practices of student success.Retrieved from http://www.achievingthedream.org/sites/default/files/resources/PrinciplesAndPracticesofStudentSuccess_StrengtheningInstitutionalResearchAndInformationTechnologyCapacityThroughATD.pdf Hartley, R. & Almuhaidib, Saud M. Y. (2007) User oriented techniques to support interaction and decision making with large educational databases. Computers & Education, 48(2), 268-284. Lindquist, S. B. (1999). A Profile of Institutional Researchers from AIR National Membership Surveys. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1999(104), 41. Olsen, D. (2000). Institutional Research. New Directions for Higher Education, 2000(111), 103-111. Schultheis, R. , & Summer, M. (1995). Management information systems:The Manager’s View. Chicago : Irwin. Taylor, J. , Hanlon, M. , & Yorke, M. (2013). The Evolution and Practice of Institutional Research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2013(157), 59-75. Terenzini, P. T. (2012). “On the Nature of Institutional Research” Revisited: Plus ça Change… ? Research in Higher Education, 54(2), 137-148. Terkla, D. G. (2008). Institutional research: More than just data. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Volkwein, J. F., Liu, Y., and Woodwll, J. (2012). The structure and functions of institutional research offices. In R. D., Howard, G. W., McLaughlin, W. E. Knight, and associates (2012).The Handbook of Institutional Research (pp. 22-39). San Francisco, Calif. : Jossey-Bass. Zheng, H. Y. (2015) Business intelligence as a data-based decision support system and its roles in support of institutional research and planning. In A. J. Calderon & K. L. Webber (Ed.), Institutional Research and Planning in Higher Education: Global contexts and themes (pp. 159-173). New York: Routledge. 二、中文部分 朱斌妤(2015)。巨量資料對公共治理的影響-巨量決策機制與平台效益評估。科技部專題研究計畫(編號:NSC 104-2420-H-004-040-MY2),未出版。 何希慧 (2014)。 校務研究的新思維:大學校院建立學生入學管理模式。評鑑雙月刊(52),頁 14-18。 何希慧 (2015)。 大學建立校務研究體制之建議:以學習成效評估及提升機制為例。評鑑雙月刊(57),頁 38-41。 吳仁和與林信惠(2010)。系統分析與設計 : 理論與實務應用(第五版)。臺北市 : 智勝文化。 林秀雲(譯)(2013)。社會科學研究方法(Earl Babbie原著)。臺北:雙葉書廊。 林俊宏(譯)(2014)。大數據:教育篇:教學與學習的未來趨勢(Viktor Mayer-Schönberger & Kenneth Cukier原著)。臺北:天下文化。 林靜慧、簡瑋成和許政行 (2015)。 美國印第安那大學校務研究辦公室運作案例分享。評鑑雙月刊(58),頁 26-29。 祝若穎(2016)。實務分享二:校務資料應用於學生學習成效(之一)。臺灣校務研究專業協會通訊(3),頁2。 常桐善(2015)。 校務研究與大學治理,校務研究與大學治理研習。 陳向明(2009)。社會科學質的研究(初版)。臺北市:五南出版社。 陳敦源、朱斌妤、黃東益、蕭乃沂(2016)。應用巨量資料分析於政治大學的決策支援。國立政治大學專題研究計畫,未出版。 傅遠智(2016)。 校務研究與大學校務評鑑。評鑑雙月刊(60),頁 18-21。 彭森明(2013)。高等教育校務研究的理念與應用(初版)。台北市 : 高等教育出版:智勝文化總經銷。 彭森明(2015)。 政府如何協助大專校院推展校務研究:美國經驗。評鑑雙月刊(57),頁 16-22。 黃淑玲、Wolff, R. (2013)。 關鍵時刻的校務研究與評鑑新貌。評鑑雙月刊(45),頁 39-43。 黃曉波(2014)。 校務研究的起源與任務。高教技職簡訊, 95,頁 8-9。 臺灣高等財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會(2009)。 99年度大學院校院系所評鑑實施計畫。2016年7月30日,取自:http://www.heeact.edu.tw/ct.asp?xItem=5136&CtNode=891&mp=4 蕭玉真(2016)。 以校務研究改進大學校院評鑑指標與方式之探討。臺灣教育評論月刊, 5(3),頁 48-51。 |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 公共行政學系 103256012 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103256012 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [公共行政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
601201.pdf | 2668Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 785 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|