政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/112645
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51065691      線上人數 : 920
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112645


    題名: 亂世人才學：動盪環境中人力管理的組織作為
    Talent Retention in Turbulent Environment : Organizing Practices for Human Resource Management within Constraints
    作者: 王琳
    Wang, Lin
    貢獻者: 蕭瑞麟
    Hsiao, Ruey Lin
    王琳
    Wang, Lin
    關鍵詞: 劣勢創新
    人力資源管理
    隨創
    資源拼湊
    制約解讀
    Frugal innovation
    Human resource management
    Bricolage
    Resource making-do
    Constraint interpretation
    日期: 2017
    上傳時間: 2017-09-13 14:29:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 全球的經營環境詭譎多變，對企業而言「變」是唯一的不變。在競爭環境中，大者恆大，資源集中在強勢企業身上，而弱勢企業只能以手邊僅有的資源去面對困境。過去的隨創(bricolage)文獻多半是分析資源匱乏時，如何重新拼湊而找到創新方案，以扭轉局勢。可是我們卻忽略，在獲取、拼湊或重組資源時，弱勢企業正遭遇重重的制約，使得資源拼湊的過程面臨各種障礙。當企業身處動盪的環境中，如何以不足的資源翻轉局勢，是劣勢創新的新課題。本研究將由人力資源的情境中去分析這個新課題。人力資源的重點是找人才、留人才、用人才，讓企業能於競爭中存活，或幸運勝出。在太平盛世時，企業會祭出各種誘因去吸引人才；可是在亂世時，強勢競爭對手各出奇招，以重金禮聘英雄，弱勢企業的誘因就不再誘人。此時，弱勢企業應如何突圍。本研究分析一家位於深圳的互聯網新創公司，在遭遇到「搶人才」的環境中，如何憑藉著有限的資源而發展出一套組織作為因應。在學術貢獻上，本案例分析企業解除人才制約的作為，跳脫誘因設計的理論，思考如何由制度的設計去產生延攬人才的激勵因子。同時，理解隨創過程中，資源拼湊之前弱勢者是如何有嶄新的角度去解讀制約，思考出化阻力為助力的解決方案，設計出回應制約的組織作為。在實務貢獻上，本研究提出在身處動盪環境之際，如何以不足的資源設計出創新的人才管理機制，由選才、育才和評量等層面去設計留才的機制。這些作為不但能做為人力資源管理的參考，其因應制約的方式更可為各類型身處劣勢的企業提供創新的思路。
    Nowadays, the global business environment becomes more and more complex and changeful. For business, ‘change’ is the fact of constant. In the competition environment, the big ones get bigger. Most resources are centralized in a few of powerful enterprises, and vulnerable others can only use less resource at hand to face the difficulty. In the past, bricolage literatures were mostly talking about how to break through dilemma and reverse the status under limited resources. However, we overlook those weak enterprises which encounter constraints when trying to obtain, integrate, or reorganize resources. That makes them confront various barriers when getting piece of resources. When the enterprise is in a turbulent situation, how to turn the tables with limited resources is a new topic. This study would analyze this new theme through the context of human resources. The key point of human resources is to find the talents, retain the talents, and assign the talents, so to make enterprises survive or lucky win from the competition. In the times of peace and order, the enterprises resort kinds of incentives to attract the talents. However, in the troubled times, strong competitors would leave no stone unturned, pay high for hiring hero. Therefore, weak enterprises’ incentives are no longer attractive. At this point, how vulnerable enterprises break through? This study analyzes how a new Internet company in Shenzhen they rely on the limited resources to develop an organization action in the "headhunting” environment. In the academic contribution, this case analysis of how the enterprise remove human resource conduct limitation, get rid of the incentive design theory, and then thinking about how to encourage the talents through the system programming. Meanwhile, to understand in the process of implement create, before piece of resources putting together, how the weak explain the constraints with a new perspective, thinking of the solution by transforming obstacles into benefits, and designed an organized behavior to respond the constraints. In the practical contribution, this study presents how to design an innovative human resource management via selecting, training, and assess employees with insufficient resources when in the turbulent environment. Not only can be the reference of human resources management, these ideas can also bring the innovative thoughts for all types of disadvantaged enterprises
    參考文獻: 一、中文文獻
    林雅萍，2012，《創新再脈絡：統一7-ELEVEN如何重新定義日本的熱賣商品》，國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。
    蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳蕙芬，2011，市集脈絡：由組織例規分析資訊科技的創新來源，《中山管理評論》，19(2)：461-493。
    蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳蕙芬，2014，劣勢創新:梵谷策展中的隨創行為，《中山管理評論》，22(2)：323-367。
    蕭瑞麟，2017，《不用數字的研究：質性研究的思辨脈絡》，台北：五南學術原創系列。
    蕭瑞麟，2016，《思考的脈絡：創新可能不擴散》，台北：天下文化學術叢書。
    二、英文文獻
    Baker, T. 2007. Resources in play: Bricolage in the toy store(y). Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5): 694-711.
    Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. 2003. Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2): 255-276.
    Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 329-366.
    Bechky, B. A., & Okhuysen, G. A. 2011. Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handles surprises. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2): 239-261.
    Beugelsdijk, S. 2008. Strategic human resource practices and product innovation. Organization Studies, 29(6): 821-847.
    Brannen, M. Y., Liker, J. K., & Fruin, W. M. 1998. Recontextualization and factory-to-factory knowledge transfer from Japan to the US: the Case of NSK. In J. K. Liker, W. M. Fruin, & P. S. Adler (Eds.), Remade in America: Transplanting and Transforming Japanese Management Systems: 117-153. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Burack, E. H. 1991. Changing the company culture: The role of human resource development. Long Range Planning, 24(1): 88-95.
    Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. 2005. Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2): 167-199.
    Cooke, F. L., Wood, G., & Horwitz, F. 2015. Multinational firms from emerging economies in Africa: implications for research and practice in human resource management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(21): 2653-2675.
    Cueille, S. 2006. Strategic responses to a high-turbulent environment. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4): 359-383.
    Desa, G., & Basu, S. 2013. Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1): 26-49.
    Di Minin, A., Frattini, F., Bianchi, M., Bortoluzzi, G., & Piccaluga, A. 2014. Udinese Calcio soccer club as a talents factory: Strategic agility, diverging objectives, and resource constraints. European Management Journal, 32(2): 319-336.
    DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147-160.
    Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. 1994. Organizational images and member identification. Administrative science quarterly: 239-263.
    Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M., & Bednar, J. 2010. Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35(2): 265-293.
    Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. 2001. The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16(2): 95.
    Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2): 277–300.
    Gibbert, M., Hoegl, M., & Välikangas, L. 2007. In praise of resource constraints. Sloan Management Review, 48(3): 15-17.
    Hirsch, P. M. 1986. From ambushes to golden parachutes: Corporate takeovers as an instance of cultural framing and institutional integration. American Journal of Sociology, 77: 800-837.
    Howard-Grenville, J., Golden-Biddle, K., Irwin, J., & Mao, J. 2011. Liminality as cultural process for cultural change. Organization Science, 22(2): 522-539.
    Jayasinghe, M. 2016. The operational and signalling benefits of voluntary labor code adoption: Reconceptualizing the scope of human resource management in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2): 658-677.
    Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. 2013. Resource constraints as triggers of radical innovation: Longitudinal evidence from the manufacturing sector. Research Policy, 42(8): 1457-1468.
    Kostova, T. 1999. Transformational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 308-324.
    Li, J., Chu, C. W. L., Lam, K. C. K., & Liao, S. 2011. Age diversity and firm performance in an emerging economy: Implications for cross-cultural human resource management. Human Resource Management, 50(2): 247-270.
    Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7): 545.
    McCabe, D. M., & Lewin, D. 1992. Employee voice: A human resource management perspective. California Management Review, 34(3): 112-123.
    Medvec, V. H., Madey, S. E., & Gilovich, T. 1995. When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69(4): 603.
    Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. 1984. Designing strategic human resources systems. Organizational Dynamics, 13(1): 36-52.
    Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 145-179.
    Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. 1994. Technology frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2): 174-207.
    Pfeffer, J. 1994. Competitive advantage through people: Unleashing the power of the work force. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Phillips, N., & Tracey, P. 2007. Opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial capabilities and bricolage: Connecting institutional theory and entrepreneurship in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3): 313-320.
    Ployhart, R. E., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Mackenzie Jr, W. I. 2011. Acquiring and developing human capital in service context: The interconnectedness of human capital reosurces. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2): 353-368.
    Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
    Radjou, N., & Prabhu, J. 2015. Frugal Innovation: How to do more with less: PublisAffairs.
    Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. 1994. Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
    Schuler, R. S., & Jackson, S. E. 1987. Linking competitive strategies with human resource management practices. Academy of Management Executive, 1(3): 207-219.
    Schuler, R. S., & MacMillan, I. C. 1984. Gaining competitive advantage through human resource management Practices. Human Resource Management, 23: 241-255.
    Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. 2014. Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2): 211-230.
    Silverman, D. (Ed.). 1997. Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage.
    Sunduramurthy, C., Zheng, C., Musteen, M., Francis, J., & Rhyne, L. 2016. Doing more with less, systematically? Bricolage and ingenieuring in successful social ventures. Journal of World Business, 51(5): 855-870.
    Tang, J., Kacmar, K. M., & Busenitz, L. 2012. Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1): 77-94.
    Tjosvold, D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. 1984. Influenceing strategy, perspective-taking, and relationships between high- and low-power individuals in cooperative and competitive contexts. Journal of Psychology, 116(2): 187.
    Virany, B., Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. 1992. Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments - An organization learning approach. Organization Science, 3(1): 72-91.
    Wry, T., Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. 2011. Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 22(2): 449-463.
    Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Zott, C., & Amit, R. 2007. Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2): 181-199.
    Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. 2007. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 70-105.
    Zucker, L. G. 1977. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American sociological review: 726-743.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
    101932423
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1019324231
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    423101.pdf28125KbAdobe PDF2262檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋