政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/112634

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Executive Master of Business Administration > Theses > Item 140.119/112634

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112634

Title:	原鄉隨創：由服務設計辨識創業歷程 Indigenous bricolage: identifying entrepreneurial opportunities from service design
Authors:	方維熙 Fang, Wei Hsi
Contributors:	蕭瑞麟 Hsiao, Ruey Lin 方維熙 Fang, Wei Hsi
Keywords:	隨創創業家新創企業時機辨識情境原住民族 Bricolage Entrepreneur Start-ups Opportunity recognition Scenario Indigenous
Date:	2017
Issue Date:	2017-09-13 14:23:36 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	創業之目的是突破現狀，追求創新，創業家必須擁有資源才能創新產品與服務，但他們卻因資源受限而有志難伸。新創企業如何以拼湊有限資源來翻轉劣勢，是隨創（bricolage）所提倡的主導做法。可是，拼湊資源是透過怎樣的時機，當今文獻卻討論有限，因此，時機辨識成為是當前亟需探索之重點。本研究選取三個原住民族新創企業個案，分析他們的經營歷程、挑戰與如何透過辨識時機進行資源拼湊。本研究發現，原住民族文化是重要的資源，這些在地資源成為識別機會、突破資源稀缺的服務創新關鍵。在學術意涵上，本研究提出三個議題。第一，辨識時機需要觀察資源轉換脈絡；第二，辨識時機需要設定資源使用情境；第三，辨識時機需找出資源調合方式。在實務啟示上，本研究提出辨識時機的各種可能，並歸納多樣的隨創原則。進行隨創時，若能掌握在地文化便可以找出適當時機，讓有限的資源拼湊出無限的創新。 The objective of entrepreneurship is to seek breakthrough innovation within status quo. Entrepreneurs must obtain resources in order to innovate new products or services. But their aspirations often are frustrated due to resource constraints. The dominant approach to entrepreneurial bricolage is to advise new ventures to turnaround adversities by making-do with resources. But, when could entrepreneurs identify opportunity for tinkering limited resources? This is an inquiry worth further investigation. This research selects three case studies of indigenous start-ups while analyzes their entrepreneurial process and challenges within; and examines how they recognize opportunities in creative resource tinkering. This study found that indigenous culture is a kind of critical local resource, which may trigger opportunity recognition in order to guide resource making-do and achieve service innovation. Theoretically, this study suggests that (1) opportunity recognition must understand the context that is suitable for the transformation of resource quality; (2) opportunity recognition must pay attention to resource deployment in situ; (3) opportunity recognition should identify methods of resource blending. Practically, this study proposes several possibilities of opportunity recognition and summarizes a variety of bricolage principles. When engaging entrepreneurial bricolage, if we could get a grip with local culture, it increases our chance to identify the right moment and allow limited resources to enact unlimited innovation.
Reference:	中文文獻蕭瑞麟，2011，讓脈絡思考創新，台北，天下文化。蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳蕙芬，2014，劣勢創新：梵谷策展中的隨創行為，中山管理評論，22 卷2期：323~367。英文文獻 Alexander, J., & Luedtke, K. 2013. The user centric approach and participant flow maps: A new look at increasing participation and engagement. Managed Care Outlook, 26(12): 1-7. Andersen, O. J. 2008. A bottom-up perspective on innovations: Mobilizing knowledge and social capital through innovative processes of bricolage. Administration & Society, 40(1): 57-78. Baker, T. 2007. Resources in play: Bricolage in the toy store(y). Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5): 694-711. Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. 2003. Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2): 255-276. Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 329-366. Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120. Bitner, M. J., Ostrom, A. L., & Morgan, F. N. 2008. Service blueprinting: A practical technique for service innovation. California Management Review, 50(3): 66-94. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage. Grant, R. M.1991.The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3):114–135 Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2): 277–300. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1993. Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, 71(2): 75-84. Levi-Strauss, C. 1968. The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lovlie, L., Downs, C., & Reason, B. 2008. Bottom‐line experiences: Measuring the value of design in service. Design Management Review, 19(1): 73-79. McCann, J. E. 1991. Design Principles for an Innovating Company. Academy of Management Executive, May(5): 76-93. Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. Phillips, N., & Tracey, P. 2007. Opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial capabilities and bricolage: Connecting institutional theory and entrepreneurship in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3): 313-320. Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. 2014. Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2): 211-230. Shostack, G. L. 1984. Designing services that deliver. Harvard Business Review, 62(1): 133-139. Singh, R. P. 2001. A Comment on Developing the Field of Entrepreneurship through the Study of Opportunity Recognition and Exploitation. Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 10-12. Tyre, M., & Orlikowski, W. J. 1994. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science, 5: 98-118. Vaghely, I. P., & Julien, P.-A. 2010. Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1): 73-86. Wernerfelt, B. 1995. The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 171-174. Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. 2001. Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 179-201.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程(EMBA) 102932073
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102932073
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Executive Master of Business Administration] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
207301.pdf	3116Kb	Adobe PDF2	69	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...