政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/112169
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51160416      Online Users : 972
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112169


    Title: 精實思維、產品開發流程與專案績效關係之研究-以B公司為例
    The Research on the Relationships between Lean Thinking, New Product Development and Project Performance: A Case study of Company B
    Authors: 胡智偉
    Contributors: 李易諭
    胡智偉
    Keywords: 精實思維
    產品開發流程
    專案績效
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-08-28 11:29:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 條碼印表機及自動識別產業在台灣發展僅20多年，然而台灣在豐沛的研發資源挹注下，國內各條碼印表機品牌產品在過去10數年間於全球市場上有相當亮眼之表現。條碼印表機需使用於工商業場所，產品特性要求品質穩定度高，生命週期長，產品生產須靈活且快速以滿足少量多樣之供貨，產品應用方面常須與系統業者調適後搭載供貨給專案或是企業用戶。業者於此客製、穩定、多樣化出貨之產品特性下，需要以不斷優化之精實系統完善產品開發流程以達成各種專案績效。
    精實思維提供企業如何以最小化的投資，提升企業營運效率，創造客戶價值的作法。本研究透過書籍、文獻、報告等理論研讀後，說明精實思維對創造客戶價值之重要性，然後藉由個案分析法，從產業環境、SWOT分析、與個案公司高階主管訪談整理方式，瞭解個案公司之精實產品開發過程與績效表現之關係。從研究發現，從產品開發流程便導入精實思維及納入績效評估作法，可以讓產品開發由流程開始優化，讓企業內遵循精實原則進行產品設計、生產管理和出貨管理進而創造客戶價值達成專案及企業經營績效。
    Reference: 中文部分(依作者姓氏筆劃排序)
    1. 王孝文（2011）。知識管理對於營建專案績效之影響（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號099NCU05718013）
    2. 王明妤（2000）。新產品開發流程中功能性價值之選擇研究—以數位電視機與經營資訊服務為例（博士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號089NCTU0031005）
    3. 安蔓雅（2016）。創新導向與新產品開發績效：團隊創新、團隊訊息處理集團對反思連結之迷思（博士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號105PCCU0321005）
    4. 吳思華（1998）。知識流通對產業創新的影響。第七屆產業管理研討會張貼之論文，國立政治大所科技管理研究所，臺北市。
    5. 李中揚（2009）。精實生產與連續流關係之研究（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號097NKIT5457024）
    6. 李裕昆（譯）（1990）。改變世界的企業經營體制：臨界生產方式（原作者： J.P. Womack, D.T. Jones, and D. Roos.）。台北：中華企業管理發展中心。
    7. 林怜岑（2007）。影響績效之知識管理要素（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號095NSYS5636030）
    8. 林貞言（2012）。精實工具於新產品開發之應用研究（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號100NCKU5031034）
    9. 洪士峰（2011）。精實生產對製造業營運績效影響之研究（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號099NSYS5121082）
    10. 孫俊吉（2012）。電廠導入精實生產關鍵成功因素之研究（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號100NSYS5121041）
    11. 張聖麟（1998）。卓越化生產管理。台北市：華泰。
    12. 張權贏（2014）。專案人員屬性、自我效能及工作特性對專案績效影響之研究－以伺服器製造業為例（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號103SHU05121016）
    13. 郭俊男（2002）。運籌能力、競爭策略與經營績效關係之研究（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號090NSYS5007083）
    14. 陳姿伶（2004）。個案研究法（Case Study）。國立中興大學農業推廣教育研究所研究報告，未出版。
    15. 陳彥如（2009）。專案經理領導能力、團隊承諾與專案績效之關聯性研究：以高科技產業為例（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號097TKU05121033）
    16. 彭鈺棠（2014）。精實思維、夥伴關係與流程創新之研究-以A公司營業所為例（碩士論文）。取自http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/58908
    17. 楊順兆（2007）。應用平衡計分卡觀點探討營造產業之經營績效-以某營造廠為例（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號096CHPI5230016）
    18. 楊耀川、成玉山（譯）（1988）。豐田生產方式與現場管理（原作者：大野耐一）。初版。台北市：中華企業管理發展中心。
    19. 劉仁傑（1998）。企業改造：台中精機製程合理化及事業轉型。台北市：中衛發展中心。
    20. 蔣維理（2001）。成功的新產品開發模式研究（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號090NCTU0627007）
    21. 鄭丞庭（2006）。委外策略選擇對組織效益之影響—企業與派遣服務業之觀點（碩士論文）。取自http://ir.lib.nsysu.edu.tw:8080/handle/987654321/32842
    22. 賴美豆（2009）。運動鞋產業運用精實新產品開發模式之個案研究（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號097YUNT5794006）
    23. 戴志真（2011）。以精實管理手法改善訂單允諾程序之績效研究—以IC載板廠為例（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號100NTHU5031147）
    24. 謝正鵬（2007）。結合精實生產與交易成本理論以改善台灣企業的成本競爭力-以台灣品牌液晶電視製造商為例（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號095NCKU5457039）
    25. 謝安田（1989）。企業研究方法。台北市：華泰。
    26. 鍾漢清（譯）（1996）。精實革命：消除浪費、創造獲利的有效方法（原作者：J.P. Womack & D.T. Jones.）。臺北市：中華企業管理發展中心。
    27. 鍾漢清（譯）（1998）。精實系統革命（原作者: J.P. Womack & D.T. Jones）。台北：華人戴明。
    28. 鍾漢清（譯）（2015）。精實革命：消除浪費、創造獲利的有效方法（原作者: James P. Womack，Daniel T. Jones）。經濟新潮社。
    29. 簡定華（2014）。新產品開發專案模糊性與專案績效關係之研究-知識分享與領導能力之干擾效果（博士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號102YUNT5121023）
    30. 蘇文鈺（1997）。新產品開發流程之管理架構-IDEF0造模、QFD方法及VSM價值溪流分析之統合應用（碩士論文）。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。（系統編號095FCU05457020）

    英文部分
    1. Ahire, S. L., Golhar, D. Y., & Waller, M. A. (1996). Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decision Sciences, 27(1), 23-56.
    2. Ahire, S. L., Landeros, R., & Golhar, D. Y. (1995). Total quality management: a literature review and an agenda for future research. Production and Operations Management, 4(3), 277-306.
    3. Balachandra, R., & Friar, J. H. (1997). Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 276-287.
    4. Booz, Allen, & Hamilton. (1982). New products management for the 1980s. New York, NY: Booz, Allen & Hamilton.
    5. Clark, K. B., Chew, W. B., Fujimoto, T., Meyer, J., & Scherer, F. (1987). Product development in the world auto industry. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(3), 729-781.
    6. Cochran, B. and Thompson, G. C. (1964) Why new products fail, Conf. Board Rec., Nov., pp. 11-18.
    7. Cooper, R. G. (1981). An empirically derived new product project selection model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management(3), 54-61.
    8. Cooper, R. G. (2001). Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch. New York, NY: Perseus Books Group.
    9. Cusumano, M. A. (1988). Manufacturing innovation: Lessons from the Japanese auto industry. MIT Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 29.
    10. Davila, A. (2003). Short-term economic incentives in new product development. Research policy, 32(8), 1397-1420.
    11. Devaraj, S., Krajewski, L., & Wei, J. C. (2007). Impact of e-business technologies on operational performance: the role of production information integration in the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1199-1216.
    12. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
    13. Freeman, M., & Beale, P. (1992). Measuring project success. Project Management Journal, 23(1), 8-17.
    14. Frohman, A. L. (1982). Technology as a competitive weapon. Harvard Business Review, 60(1).
    15. Fujimoto, T. (1999). The evolution of a manufacturing system at Toyota. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    16. Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., Brewer, P. C., & McGowan, A. (2010). Managerial accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 792-793.
    17. Hauptman, O. (1990). The different roles of communication in software development and hardware R&D: Phenomenologic paradox or atheoretical empiricism? Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 7(1), 49-71.
    18. Ho, Y. C., & Tsai, C. T. (2011). Front end of innovation of high technology industries: The moderating effect of front-end fuzziness. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 22(1), 47-58.
    19. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    20. Karlsson, C., & Ahlström, P. (1996). The difficult path to lean product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(4), 283-295.
    21. Karlsson, C., & Åhlström, P. (1996). Assessing changes towards lean production. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(2), 24-41.
    22. Krafcik, J. F. (1988). Triumph of the lean production system. MIT Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 41.
    23. Larson, E. W., & Gobeli, D. H. (1988). Organizing for product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(3), 180-190.
    24. Liker, J. (2004). The Toyota Way (2004). 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer. New York, NY: McGrall-Hill Professional.
    25. Liker, J., & Meier D. (2006). The Toyota way fieldbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
    26. Link, P. L. (1987). Keys to new product success and failure. Industrial Marketing Management, 16(2), 109-118.
    27. Luine, J., Bulman, J., Burch, J., Daly, K., Lee, A., Pettiette‐Hall, C., . . . Miller, D. (1992). Characteristics of high performance YBa2Cu3O7 step-edge junctions. Applied physics letters, 61(9), 1128-1130.
    28. Maidique, M. A., & Zirger, B. J. (1984). A study of success and failure in product innovation: the case of the US electronics industry. IEEE Transactions on engineering management(4), 192-203.
    29. Mansfield, E., & Wagner, S. (1975). Organizational and strategic factors associated with probabilities of success in industrial R & D. the Journal of Business, 48(2), 179-198.
    30. Marquis, D. G. (1969). The anatomy of successful innovations. Innovation, 1(7), 28-37.
    31. Millard, R. L. (2001). Value stream analysis and mapping for product development (Master`s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA395119
    32. Muffatto, M. (1998). Reorganizing for product development: Evidence from Japanese automobile firms. International journal of production economics, 56, 483-493.
    33. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    34. Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C., Jr. & Ruekert, R. W. (1995). Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. The Journal of Marketing, 48-62.
    35. Pinto, J. K., & Mantel, S. J. (1990). The causes of project failure. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(4), 269-276.
    36. Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D. P. (1987). Critical factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management(1), 22-27.
    37. Rich, N., Bateman, N., Esain, A., Massey, L., & Samuel, D. (2006). Lean evolution: lessons from the workplace. Cambrige, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    38. Robbins S. P. (1994).Organizational Behavior (pp. 976-982). London, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.
    39. Rothwell, R., Freeman, C., Horlsey, A., Jervis, V., Robertson, A., & Townsend, J. (1974). SAPPHO updated-project SAPPHO phase II. Research Policy, 3(3), 258-291.
    40. Saren, M. A. (1984). A classification and review of models of the intra-firm innovation process. R&D Management, 14(1), 11-24.
    41. Sbragia, R. (1984). Clarity of manager roles and performance of R&D multidisciplinary projects in matrix structures. R&D Management, 14(2), 113-126.
    42. Shankar, R., Frapaise, X., & Brown, B. (2006). Lean drug development in R&D. Drug Discovery & Development, 9(5), 57-60.
    43. Sherman, J. D., Berkowitz, D., & Souder, W. E. (2005). New product development performance and the interaction of cross‐functional integration and knowledge management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(5), 399-411.
    44. Shrnhur, A. J., Levy, O., & Dvir, D. (1997). Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project Management Journal, 28(2), 5-13.
    45. Song, M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2001). The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 61-80.
    46. Souder, W. E. (1987). Managing new product innovations. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    47. Skinner, C. E., & Asher, J. R. (1969). Effects of storage contention on system performance. IBM Systems Journal, 8(4), 319-333.
    48. Tatikonda, M. V., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2001). Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science, 47(1), 151-172.
    49. Tatikonda, M. V., & Rosenthal, S. R. (2000). Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: a deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(1), 74-87.
    50. Trott, P. (1998) Innovation Management & New Product Development. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.
    51. Tzortzopoulos P., & Kagioglou, M. (2003). Appliciation of lean construction principles in product development process modeling, Proceedings of the International Group of Lean Contruction 11th Annual Conference, Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA.
    52. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.
    53. Verworn, B. (2006). How German measurement and control firms integrate market and technological knowledge into the front end of new product development. International Journal of Technology Management, 34(3-4), 379-389.
    54. Womack, J. P. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
    55. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world: Based on the MIT 5-million-dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile. New York, NY: Rawson Associates.
    56. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1991). The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production (1st ed.). New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
    57. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1994). From lean production to the lean enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 93-103.
    58. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Beyond Toyota: how to root out waste and pursue perfection. Harvard business review, 74(5), 140-158.
    59. Womack, J. P. & Jones, D. T. (2003). Seeing the whole: Mapping the Extended value Stream. Brookline, MA: The Lean Enterprise Institute.
    60. Warnecke, H.J. & Hüser, M. (1995). Lean production. International Journal of Production Economics. 14(41), 37-43.
    61. Ward, P. T., McCreery, J. K., Ritzman, L. P., & Sharma, D. (1998). Competitive priorities in operations management. Decision Sciences, 29(4), 1035-1046.
    62. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage publishing.
    63. Yoon, E., & Lilien, G. L. (1985). New industrial product performance: The effects of market characteristics and strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2(3), 134-144.

    網站部分
    1. Grand View Research. (2016). Barcode printers market size by technology (Laser, ink-jet, impact, direct thermal, thermal transfer), By Product (Desktop, Mobile, Tabletop/Industrial), By Application (Retail, Manufacturing, Shipping, Government, Healthcare), Industry Analysis Report, Regional Outlook, Application Potential, Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2015 – 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/barcode-printers-market-size?utm_source=globenewswire.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=Paid_Globnewswire
    2. Husain, S. (2016). New report: 2016 Global mobile thermal printing solutions market. Natik, MA: VDC Research. Retrieved from: http://www.vdcresearch.com/News-events/autoid-blog/Global-Mobile-Thermal-Printing-Solutions-Market.html
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
    103932056
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103932056
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Executive Master of Business Administration] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback