政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/111832
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50976032      Online Users : 879
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111832


    Title: 影響在臺陸資進入模式的決定因素:公司型態所扮演的角色
    The Determinants of Entry Mode of Mainland China Enterprises in Taiwan : The Role of Enterprise Types
    Authors: 毛珮荃
    Mao, Pei Chuan
    Contributors: 翁永和
    毛珮荃
    Mao, Pei Chuan
    Keywords: 進入模式
    公司型態
    民營企業
    非民營企業
    國有企業
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-08-10 10:09:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 對於對外直接投資進入模式的討論,文獻探討不勝枚舉,有從交易成本理論、有從折衷理論或有從資源基礎與高層理論等等面向探討,在各個理論下又可拆分出不同影響要素,如廠商規模、國際化經驗、所有權優勢、巿場風險等等各種影響因素。雖已有許多文獻試圖研究不同要素間交互影響下,是否對於廠商進入模式選擇會有不同,惟對於不同型態下的廠商,民營企業及非民營企業如國有企業,與進入模式之決定因素互相作用下是否對於進入模式選擇有所影響,少有文獻予以討論。且臺灣與中國大陸是特殊兩岸關係,當投資者為中國國有企業時,是否會有與理論或其他實證上出現不同選擇進入模弍,為本研究欲探討目的。
    本研究利用經濟部投資審議委員會2013年「陸資投資事業營運況狀調查表」問卷資料,分別由廠商特性、策略動機、組織知識及體制與環境等構面,及由上述各構面與不同公司型態相互作用下,探討不同公司型態下,進入模式受到各決定因素受影響之結果。
    本研究運用Probit模型實證分析影響廠商進入模式之決定因素,並根據其實證結果作出結論進而提出建議。研究結果發現,「廠商規模」、「資產專屬優勢」、「為拓展臺灣巿場」及「運用臺灣高階人才」為陸資在臺投資選擇獨資模式與否之重要影響因素。其次,加入「公司型態」做為中介變數後,實證結果也證實不同公司型態對於陸資廠商選擇進入模式會有所影響,亦即當陸資廠商其公司型態為民營企業時,在其所投資產業為鼓勵類產業、進入臺灣巿場是以布局全球為動機及臺灣巿場若存有技術外溢高風險的情況下,相對於陸資非民營企業較傾向選擇獨資進入模式。
    Reference: 中文部分
    王曉龍(2013),「中國對外直接投資中投資主體的問題研究」,《現代經濟信息》,9,115。
    李文瑞(2000),「廠商海外投資股權模式關鍵影響因素之研究-台商赴東南亞投資之實證分析」,《管理評論》,19(3),25-49。
    吳青松(1999),《國際企業管理-理論與實務》,二版,臺北:智勝文化。
    吳青松與石素娟(2007),「以AHP群體決策法選擇企業在特定區位之進入模式」,《交大管理學報》,27(1),195-219。
    林武郎與臧程遠(1998),「中國大陸企業在海外投資之分析」,《中國大陸研究》,41(9),35-52。
    林彩梅(1998),「多國籍企業技術移轉與我國產業國際水平分工」,《大葉學報》,7(1),13-26。
    韋穎(2009),「基於知識管理的國有企業核心競爭力構建」,《長春大學學報》,19(9),17-19。
    翁景民與曾義明(1995),「國際進入模式決策之折衷理論暨國際進入模式組合之研究」,《臺大管理論叢》,6(2),25-59。
    高長(2002),「科技產業全球分工與 IT 產業兩岸分工策略」,《遠景季刊》,3(2),225-256。
    高長與陳威如(1998),「台商赴大陸投資所有權進入模式決定因素的分析」,《管理學報》,15(3),393-418。
    徐聯恩與樊學良(2007),「產業群聚之創新-韓國坡州出版城與Heyri藝術村的成功經驗」,《產業管理評論》,1(2),29-38。
    陳世傑、李文瑞、胡秀華、黃啟瑞與陳律睿(2008),「技術特性、廠商特性與決策者特質對廠商大陸市場進入模式之影響」,《中山管理評論》,16(3),575-612。
    陳德昇(2004),「臺商大陸投資經濟意涵與策略布局取向」,《展望與探索》,2(9),18-34。
    陳順宇(2009),《迴歸分析》,四版,臺北:三民書局。
    陳亨安(2012),「中國大陸國有企業扮演角色之研究」,《經濟研究》,13,555-578。
    連德宏(2009),「近年來中國對外直接投資之探討」,《經濟研究》,9,365-398。
    曹為忠、詹雪蘭、李文瑞與陳旭銘(2002),「進入模式、產業環境、以及廠商特性對廠商海外市場經營績效之影響」,《企業管理學報》,(54),1-32。
    曹海濤與葉日崧(2008),「中國大陸企業海外直接投資之分析」,《中國大陸研究》,51(1),31-65。
    曹海濤與葉日崧(2009),「中國企業對東南亞國協直接投資之分析」,《臺灣東南亞學刊》,6(1),109-146。
    楊建平(2015),「中國對拉丁美洲直接投資之政治經濟意涵」,《遠景基金會季刊》,16(4),165-215。
    趙永祥、李在僑與潘啟華(2012),「中國大陸投資進入模式與績效關聯性之研究」,《華人經濟研究》,10(2),43-57。
    蔡明田與程永明(2003),「臺灣製造業投資美國巿場之所有權與銷售控制進入模式之實證研究」,《管理學報》,20(1),143-176。
    鄭又平與林彥志(2008),「中國[專題研究 走出去戰略]之分析:跨世紀中國經濟的轉變」,《展望與探索》,6(8),45-62。
    劉碧珍、陳添枝與翁永和(2016),《國際貿易導論》,四版,臺北:雙葉書廊。
    黎立仁(2012),「台日經濟產業互動之回顧與展望」,《全球政治評論》,40, 29-44。
    鍾美芳(2009),「多國籍廠商進入決策與技術外溢效果分析」,《東吳經濟商學學報》,65,93-108。
    鍾美芳(2011),「海外投資策略理論與實證分析」,《文大商管學報》,16(1),63-82。
    譚大純與陳正男(2006),「地主國產業群聚、進入地主國動機對進入模式選擇及經營績效影響之研究:以我國赴歐投資廠商爲對象之實證研究」,《中山管理評論》,14(1),193-227。
    英文部分
    Agarwal, S. and S. N. Ramaswami (1992), “Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Location and Internalization Factors,” Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 1-27.
    Anderson, E. and H. Gatignon (1986), “Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions,” Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1-26.
    Andreu, R., E. Claver and D. Quer (2017), “Firm-Specific Factors and Entry Mode Choice: An Analysis of Chinese Hotel Chains,” Tourism Economics, 23(4), 756-767.
    Beamish, P. W. and J. C. Banks (1987), “Equity Joint Ventures and the Theory of the Multinational Enterprise,” Journal of International Business Studies, 18(2), 1-16.
    Brouthers, K. D. (2002), “Institutional, Cultural and Transaction Cost Influences on Entry Mode Choice and Performance,” Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203-221.
    Brouthers, K. D. and L. E. Brouthers (2003), “Why Service and Manufacturing Entry Mode Choices Differ: The Influence of Transaction Cost Factors, Risk and Trust,” Journal of Management Studies, 40(5), 1179-1204.
    Brouthers, K. D., L. E. Brouthers and S. Werner (2003). “Transaction Cost-Enhanced Entry Mode Choices and Firm Performance.” Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1239-1248.
    Brouthers, K. D. and J. F. Hennart (2007), “Boundaries of the Firm: Insights from International Entry Mode Research,” Journal of Management, 33(3), 395-425.
    Brouthers, K. D. (2013), “A Retrospective on: Institutional, Cultural and Transaction Cost Influences on Entry Mode Choice and Performance,” Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1), 14-22.
    Buckley, P., A. Cross, H. Tan, H. Voss and X. Liu (2006), “An Investigation of Recent Trends in Chinese Outward Direct Investment and Some Implications for Theory,” Centre for International Business University of Leeds Working Paper.
    Buckley, P. J., L. J. Clegg, R. C. Adam, X. Liu, V. Hinrich and Z. Ping (2007), “The Determinants of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment,” Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 499-518.
    Cheung, K. Y. and L. Ping(2004), “Spillover Effects of FDI on Innovation in China: Evidence from the Provincial Data,” China Economic Review, 15(1), 25-44.
    Contractor, F. J. (1990), “Ownership Patterns of U.S. Joint Ventures Abroad and the Liberalization of Foreign Government Regulations in the 1980s: Evidence from the Benchmark Surveys,” Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1), 55-73.
    Delios, A. and P. W. Beamish (1999), “Ownership Strategy of Japanese Firms: Transactional, Institutional, and Experience Influences,” Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 915-933.
    Deng, P. (2004), “Outward Investment by Chinese MNCs: Motivations and Implications,” Business Horizons, 47(3), 8-16.
    Eriksson, K., J. Johanson, A. Majkgard and D. D. Sharma (1997), “Experiential Knowledge and Cost in the Internationalization Process,” Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2), 337-360.
    Erramilli, M. K. (1991), “The Experience Factor in Foreign Market Entry Behavior of Service Firms,” Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3), 479-501.
    Erramilli, M. K. and C. P. Rao (1990), “Choice of Foreign Market Entry Modes by Service Firms: Role of Market Knowledge,” Management International Review, 30(2), 135-150.
    Erramilli, M. K. and C. P. Rao (1993), “Service Firms International Entry Mode Choice: A Modified Transaction Cost Analysis Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 19-38.
    Fagre, N. and L. T. Wells (1982), “Bargaining Power of Multinationals and Host Governments,” Journal of International Business Studies , 13(2), 9-23.
    Gatignon, H. and E. Anderson (1988), “The Multinational Corporation`s Degree of Control over Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4(2), 305-336.
    Gomes-Casseres, B. (1990), “Firm Ownership Preferences and Host Government Restrictions: An Integrated Approach,” Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1), 1-22.
    Hennart, J. F. (1991), “The Transaction Costs Theory of Joint Ventures: An Empirical Study of Japanese Subsidiaries in the United States,” Management Science, 37(4), 483-497.
    Hill, C. W. L., P. Hwang and W. C. Kim (1990), “An Eclectic Theory of the Choice of International Entry Mode,” Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 117-128.
    Johanson, J. and J. E. Vahlne (1977), “The Internationalization Process of the Firm-A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments,” Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32.
    Kim, W. C. and P. Hwang (1992), “Global Strategy and Multinationals Entry Mode Choice,” Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 29-53.
    Kogut, B. (1988), “Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives,” Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 319-332.
    Kogut, B. and H. Singh (1985), Entering the United States by Acquisition or Joint Venture: Country Patterns and Cultural Characteristics, Reginald H. Johnes Center, Working Paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
    Kogut, B.and H. Singh (1988a), “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode,” Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432.
    Kogut, B. and H. Singh (1988b), “Entering the United States by Joint Venture: Competitive Rivalry and Industry Structure,” in Contractor, F. and P. Lorange (ed.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business, 241-251, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
    Kogut, B. and U. Zander (1992), “Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology,” Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
    Kumar, V. and V. Subramaniam (1997), “A Contingency Framework for the Mode of Entry Decision,” Journal of World Business, 32(1), 53-72.
    Lahiri, S. (2017), “The Moderation Influence of Market Potential and Prior Experience on the Governance Quality-Equity Participation Relationship: Evidence from Acquisitions in BRIC,” Management Decision, 55(1), 203-217.
    Larimo, J. (2003), “Form of Investment by Nordic Firms in World Markets,” Journal of Business Research, 56(10), 791-803.
    Lecraw, D. J. (1984), “Bargaining Power, Ownership, and Profitability of Transnational Corporations in Developing Countries,” Journal of International Business Studies, 15(1), 27-43.
    Luo, Y. D. (2001), “Determinants of Entry in an Emerging Economy: A Multilevel Approach,” Journal of Management Studies, 38(3), 443-472.
    Meyer, K. E. (2009), Foreighn Market Entry, Princeton ,Princeton University Press, 491-495.
    Meyer, K. E. and H. V. Nguyen (2005), “Foreign Investment Strategies and Sub-national Institutions in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Vietnam,” Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 63-93.
    Meyer, K. E., S. Estrin, S. K. Bhaumik and M. W. Peng (2009), “Institutions, Resources, and Entry Strategies in Emerging Economies,” Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61-80.
    Pan, Y. and D. K. Tse (2000), “The Hierarchical Model of Market Entry Modes,” Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 535-554.
    Padmanabhan, P. and K. R. Cho (1996), “Ownership Strategy for a Foreign Affiliate: An Empirical Investigation of Japanese Firms,” MIR: Management International Review, 45-65.
    Quer, D., E. Claver and L. Rienda (2012), “Chinese Multinationals and Entry Mode Choice: Institutional, Transaction and Firm Specific Factors,” Frontiers of Business Research in China, 6(1), 1-24.
    Ramasamy, B., Y. Matthew, and L. Sylvie (2012), “China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment: Location Choice and Firm Ownership,” Journal of World Business, 47(1), 17-25.
    Sauvant, K. P. (2005), “New Sources of FDI: The BRICs-Outward FDI from Brazil, Russia, India and China,” J. World Investment and Trade, 6, 639-709.
    Stopford, John M. and L. T. Wells Jr. (1972), Managing the Multinational Enterprise: Organization of the Firm and Ownership of the Subsidiary, NY: Basic Books, French Ed.
    Tsang, E. W. K. and P. S. L. Yip (2007), “Economic Distance and the Survival of Foreign Direct Investments,” The Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1156-1168.
    Williamson, O. E. (1991). “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269-296.
    Wind, Y. and H. Perlmutter (1977), “On the Identification of Frontier Issues in Multinational Marketing,” Columbia Journal of World Business, 12(4), 131-139.
    Woodcock, C. P., P. W. Beamish and S. Makino (1994), “Ownership-Based Entry Mode Strategies and International Performance,” Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 253-273.
    Yu, J., S-H. Lee and K. Han (2015), “FDI Motives, Market Governance, and Ownership Choice of MNEs: A Study of Malaysia and Thailand from an Incomplete Contracting Perspective,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(2), 335-362.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    104921011
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104921011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    101101.pdf1695KbAdobe PDF231View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback