政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/111728
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51257235      線上人數 : 895
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/111728


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111728


    題名: 槓桿型指數型基金之追蹤誤差 : 以標的指數所屬產業分析
    Tracking Error of Leveraged Exchange : Traded Funds -analysis of industries of underlying indexes
    作者: 林恩加
    貢獻者: 岳夢蘭
    林恩加
    關鍵詞: 槓桿型/反向型ETF
    追蹤誤差
    產業
    Leveraged/inverse ETF
    Tracking error
    Industry
    日期: 2017
    上傳時間: 2017-08-10 09:43:21 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文探討槓桿型/反向型ETF之追蹤誤差是否會因為追縱標的屬於不同產業而有差異。為此先將46檔具有顯著追蹤誤差之槓桿型/反向型ETF樣本分為七類不同的產業，並設定產業作虛擬變數放入多元迴歸模型中，結果為當追蹤指數屬於建築業、零售業及服務業之槓桿型/反向型ETF傾向得到較大的追蹤誤差，而追蹤指數屬於礦產業、製造業、水電業及金融業者，其追蹤誤差較小。追蹤誤差大之產業，其指數波動度也較大，推測指數波動度可能是造成特定產業追蹤績效不佳的原因。另外在本研究中也發現，追蹤礦產業、建築業及製造業指數之槓桿型/反向型ETF，其槓桿型績效優於反向型績效；而追蹤水電業、零售業、金融業及服務業指數之槓桿型/反向型ETF則是反向型績效優於槓桿型績效。其原因推測與ETF存在年限、ETF發行公司和指數成分股個數有關。
    This paper discusses whether the tracking error of leveraged/inverse ETF varies by industry of underlying indexes. We take 46 leveraged/inverse ETFs with significant tracking error into the samples, divide them into 7 different industries and set those industries as dummy variables in multiple regression models. The outcome shows that the tracking error tends to be larger if the underlying index of leveraged/inverse ETF belongs to construction, retails or service industries; otherwise, the tracking error tends to be smaller if it tracks the index from mining, manufacturing, utility or finance industries. The larger tracking errors may result from more volatile indexes of those industries. Besides, we also find that leveraged ETFs outperform the inverse ones if the index belongs to mining, construction or manufacturing industry; on the other hand, inverse ETFs outperform leveraged ones when the index comes from utility, retails, finance or service industry. The possible reasons may be the different characteristics of ETFs, such as the length of ETF’s existence, ETF’s issuer and the number of constituents in underlying index.
    參考文獻: Charupat, N., and Miu, P. (2011). The pricing and performance of leveraged exchange-traded funds. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(4), 966-977.
    Chu, P. K. K. (2011). Study on the tracking errors and their determinants: evidence from Hong Kong exchange traded funds. Applied Financial Economics, 21(5), 309-315.
    Drenovak, M., Urošević, B., & Jelic, R. (2014). European bond ETFs: tracking errors and the sovereign debt crisis. European Financial Management, 20(5), 958-994.
    Frino, A., Gallagher, D. R., Neubert, A. S., and Oetomo, T. N. (2004). Index design and implications for index tracking. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(2), 89-95.
    Grinblatt, M., and Titman, S. (1989). Mutual fund performance: An analysis of quarterly portfolio holdings. Journal of business, 393-416.
    Guo, K., and Leung, T. (2015). Understanding the tracking errors of commodity leveraged ETFs. In Commodities, Energy and Environmental Finance (pp. 39-63). Springer New York.
    Hill, J. M. (2016). The Evolution and Success of Index Strategies in ETFs. Financial Analysts Journal, 72(5), 8-13.
    Johnson, W. F. (2009). Tracking errors of exchange traded funds. Journal of Asset Management, 10(4), 253-262.
    Lu, L., Wang, J., and Zhang, G. (2009). Long term performance of leveraged ETFs.
    Miu, P., and Charupat, N. (2016). Leveraged Exchange-traded Funds: A Comprehensive Guide to Structure, Pricing, and Performance. Springer.
    Osterhoff, F., and Kaserer, C. (2016). Determinants of tracking error in German ETFs–the role of market liquidity. Managerial Finance, 42(5), 417-437.
    Pope, P. F., and Yadav, P. K. (1994). Discovering errors in tracking error. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 20(2), 27-32.
    Roll, R. (1992). A mean/variance analysis of tracking error. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 18(4), 13-22.
    Shin, S., and Soydemir, G. (2010). Exchange-traded funds, persistence in tracking errors and information dissemination. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 20(4), 214-234.
    Tang, H., and Xu, X. E. (2013). Solving the return deviation conundrum of leveraged exchange-traded funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(01), 309-342.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理研究所
    103357021
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103357021
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    702101.pdf2103KbAdobe PDF248檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋