English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113485/144472 (79%)
Visitors : 51390461      Online Users : 776
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111344


    Title: 線上決策輔助是否改變傳統上消費者之決策漏斗
    Do online decision aids change the traditional decision funnel for customers
    Authors: 蘇曉淳
    Su, Annie
    Contributors: 吳文傑
    Wu, Jack
    蘇曉淳
    Su, Annie
    Keywords: 線上決策
    決策漏斗
    消費者
    Online decision
    Decision funnel
    Customers
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-07-24 12:08:19 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: The goal of this study was to build a more holistic and comprehensive look of the effects of search and decision tools (collectively known as decision aids) on the traditional consumer decision process. Specifically, how it affects the information search and alternative evaluation stages. It combined multiple models and concepts from different areas of consumer decision behavior, decision support systems, technology acceptance and task-technology fit theory. It explores how consumers use five different decision aids that are commonly found in today’s marketplace: consumer reviews, social media and electronic-word-of-mouth, comparison matrices, filter agents, and virtual assistants. The effects of these different decision aids were compared in both the information search stage and alternative evaluation stage.

    In information search, a 5x2 within-subject factorial study was used to determine the effects of decision aids over time (present vs. ten years ago). Two-way repeated ANOVA found that the effects of decision aids in terms of perceived usage across all decision aids have increased from that of ten years ago. Also, consistent with task-technology fit theory usage between each decision aid differed based on how well the decision aid’s capabilities matched the stage’s need.

    In the alternative evaluation stage, three treatments were manipulated: decision aids, task complexity (high vs. low) and step within the alternative evaluation stage of the consumer decision process (screening vs. evaluation step) in a 5x2x2 within-subject factorial design. The treatments were compared by measuring its effects on four dependent variables proposed in technology acceptance literature: perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, trusting beliefs and intention to use. Three-way repeated ANOVA showed that consumers rely on a two-step process when faced with high task complexity, screening out alternatives based on a simple non-compensatory rule before more detailed evaluation of the remaining alternatives are evaluated. The results were also consistent with task-fit theory with decision aids differing based on how well their capabilities matched each stage. The study however couldn’t provide definitive proof of differences in the two steps within the alternative evaluation as the significance of the results varied.
    Reference: Alba, Joseph, John Lynch, Barton Weitz, Chris Janiszewski, Richard Lutz, Alan Sawyer, and Stacy Wood (1997), “Interactive Home Shopping. Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (3), 38.
    Anderson, Christopher J. (2003), “The psychology of doing nothing. Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion,” Psychological Bulletin, 129 (1), 139–67.
    Arnold Kamis, Marios Koufaris, and Tziporah Stern (2008), “Using an Attribute-Based Decision Support System for User-Customized Products Online: An Experimental Investigation,” MIS Quarterly, 32 (1), 159–77.
    Baumol, William J. and Edward A. Ide (1956), “Variety in Retailing,” Management Science, 3 (1), 93–101.
    Benbasat, Izak and Weiquan Wang (2005), “Trust In and Adoption of Online Recommendation Agents,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6 (3).
    Benlian, Alexander, Ryad Titah, and Thomas Hess (2012), “Differential Effects of Provider Recommendations and Consumer Reviews in E-Commerce Transactions. An Experimental Study,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 29 (1), 237–72.
    Bo Xiao and Izak Benbasat (2007), “E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact,” MIS Quarterly, 31 (1), 137–209.
    Botti, Simona and Sheena S. Lyengar (2004), “The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: when people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction,” Journal of personality and social psychology, 87 (3), 312–26.
    Broniarczyk, Susan M. and Jill G. Griffin (2014), “Decision Difficulty in the Age of Consumer Empowerment,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 608–25.
    Bruyn, Arnaud de, John C. Liechty, Eelko K. R. E. Huizingh, and Gary L. Lilien (2008), “Offering Online Recommendations with Minimum Customer Input Through Conjoint-Based Decision Aids,” Marketing Science, 27 (3), 443–60.
    Chau, Patrick Y. (2015), “An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 13 (2), 185–204.
    Childers, Terry L., Christopher L. Carr, Joann Peck, and Stephen Carson (2001), “Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior,” Journal of Retailing, 77 (4), 511–35.
    Davis, Fred D. (1989), “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319.
    ———, Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw (1992), “Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22 (14), 1111–32.
    Day, George S., Allan D. Shocker, and Rajendra K. Srivastava (1979), “Customer-Oriented Approaches to Identifying Product-Markets,” Journal of Marketing, 43 (4), 8.
    DeNale, Rebecca and Deanna Weidenhamer (2017), “U.S. Census Bureau News Quarterly Retail e-Commerce Sales: 4th Quarter 2016,” (Accessed May 4, 2017), [available at https://www.census.gov/retail/ecommerce/historic_releases.html]
    Diehl, Kristin (2005), “When Two Rights Make a Wrong. Searching Too Much in Ordered Environments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (3), 313–22.
    ———, Laura J. Kornish, and John G. Lynch (2003), “Smart Agents. When Lower Search Costs for Quality Information Increase Price Sensitivity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (1), 56–71.
    Duan, W., B. Gu, and A. WHINSTON (2008), “The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales—An empirical investigation of the movie industry,” Journal of Retailing, 84 (2), 233–42.
    Edwards, W. and B. Fasolo (2001), “Decision technology,” Annual review of psychology, 52, 581–606.
    Ellison, G. and D. Fudenberg (1995), “Word-of-Mouth Communication and Social Learning,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (1), 93–125.
    Greenwood, Shannon, Andrew Perrin and Maeve Duggan (2016), “Social Media Update 2016,” (Accessed May 15, 2017), [available at http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/]
    Gilbride, Timothy J. and Greg M. Allenby (2004), “A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules,” Marketing Science, 23 (3), 391–406.
    Goodhue, Dale L. and Ronald L. Thompson (1995), “Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance,” MIS Quarterly, 19 (2), 213.
    Häubl, Gerald and Valerie Trifts (2000), “Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments. The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids,” Marketing Science, 19 (1), 4–21.
    Hoch, Stephen J. and David A. Schkade (1996), “A Psychological Approach to Decision Support Systems,” Management Science, 42 (1), 51–64.
    Hoffman, Donna L. and Thomas P. Novak (1996), “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments. Conceptual Foundations,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (3), 50.
    Jacoby, Jacob, Donald E. Speller, and Carol A. Kohn (1974), “Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load,” Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (1), 63.
    Johnson, Eric J., Wendy W. Moe, Peter S. Fader, Steven Bellman, and Gerald L. Lohse (2004), “On the Depth and Dynamics of Online Search Behavior,” Management Science, 50 (3), 299–308.
    Kasper, George M. (1996), “A Theory of Decision Support System Design for User Calibration,” Information Systems Research, 7 (2), 215–32.
    Kim, Jiyeon and Sandra Forsythe (2008), “Adoption of Virtual Try-on technology for online apparel shopping,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22 (2), 45–59.
    Kollat, David T., James F. Engel, and Roger D. Blackwell (1970), “Current Problems in Consumer Behavior Research,” Journal of Marketing Research, 7 (3), 327.
    Komiak, Sherrie Y. X. and Izak Benbasat (2006), “The Effects of Personalizaion and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents,” MIS Q, 30 (4), 941–60.
    Koufaris, Marios (2002), “Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior,” Information Systems Research, 13 (2), 205–23.
    Laroche, Michel, Nicolas Papadopoulos, Louise A. Heslop, and Mehdi Mourali (2005), “The influence of country image structure on consumer evaluations of foreign products,” International Marketing Review, 22 (1), 96–115.
    Lurie, Nicholas H. and Na Wen (2014), “Simple Decision Aids and Consumer Decision Making,” Journal of Retailing, 90 (4), 511–23.
    Malhotra, Naresh K. (1982), “Multi-stage information processing behavior. An experimental investigation,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 10 (1-2), 54–71.
    Markus, Hazel R. and Barry Schwartz (2010), “Does Choice Mean Freedom and Well-Being?,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 344–55.
    Murray, Kyle B. and Gerald Häubl (2009), “Personalization without Interrogation. Towards more Effective Interactions between Consumers and Feature-Based Recommendation Agents,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23 (2), 138–46.
    Olson, Erik L. and Robert E. Widing (2002), “Are interactive decision aids better than passive decision aids? A comparison with implications for information providers on the internet,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16 (2), 22–33.
    Paul A. Pavlou (2003), “Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7 (3), 101–34.
    Payne, John W. (1976), “Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making. An information search and protocol analysis,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16 (2), 366–87.
    Reibstein, David J., Stuart A. Youngblood, and Howard L. Fromkin (1975), “Number of choices and perceived decision freedom as a determinant of satisfaction and consumer behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 (4), 434–37.
    Reynolds, Kristy E. and Sharon E. Beatty (1999), “Customer benefits and company consequences of customer-salesperson relationships in retailing,” Journal of Retailing, 75 (1), 11–32.
    Rogers, Everett M. (op. 1995), “Diffusion of Innovations: Modifications of a Model for Telecommunications,” in Die Diffusion von Innovationen in der Telekommunikation. Schriftenreihe des wissenschaftlichen Instituts für Kommunikationsdienste, Vol. 17, Matthias-Wolfgang Stoetzer, ed. Berlin: Springer, 25–38.
    Shugan, Steven M. (1980), “The Cost of Thinking,” Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (2), 99.
    Silverman, Barry G., Mintu Bachann, and Khaled Al-Akharas (2001), “Implications of buyer decision theory for design of e-commerce websites,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55 (5), 815–44.
    Simon, Herbert A. (1955), “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (1), 99.
    Song, Jaeki, Donald Jones, and Naveen Gudigantala (2007), “The effects of incorporating compensatory choice strategies in Web-based consumer decision support systems,” Decision Support Systems, 43 (2), 359–74.
    Sposito, V. A., M. L. Hand, and Bradley Skarpness (2007), “On the efficiency of using the sample kurtosis in selecting optimal l p estimators,” Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 12 (3), 265–72.
    Stoetzer, Matthias-Wolfgang, ed. (op. 1995), Die Diffusion von Innovationen in der Telekommunikation. Schriftenreihe des wissenschaftlichen Instituts für Kommunikationsdienste, Vol. 17. Berlin: Springer.
    Swaminathan, Vanitha (2003), “The Impact of Recommendation Agents on Consumer Evaluation and Choice: The Moderating Role of Category Risk, Product Complexity, and Consumer Knowledge,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (1-2), 93–101.
    Tan, Chuan-Hoo, Hock-Hai Teo, and Izak Benbasat (2010), “Assessing Screening and Evaluation Decision Support Systems. A Resource-Matching Approach,” Information Systems Research, 21 (2), 305–26.
    Teo, Thompson S. and Yon D. Yeong (2003), “Assessing the consumer decision process in the digital marketplace,” Omega, 31 (5), 349–63.
    Todd, Peter and Izak Benbasat (1999), “Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection,” Information Systems Research, 10 (4), 356–74.
    ——— and ——— (2000), “Inducing compensatory information processing through decision aids that facilitate effort reduction. An experimental assessment,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13 (1), 91–106.
    van der Heijden, Hans (2004), “User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly, 28 (4), 695–704.
    van Zee, Emily H., Thaddeus F. Paluchowski, and Lee R. Beach (1992), “The effects of screening and task partitioning upon evaluations of decision options,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5 (1), 1–19.
    Venkatraman, Meera P. and Linda L. Price (1990), “Differentiating between cognitive and sensory innovativeness,” Journal of Business Research, 20 (4), 293–315.
    Xiao, Bo and Izak Benbasat (2007), “E-commerce product recommendation agents: use, characteristics, and impact,” MIS Quarterly, 31 (1), 137–209.
    Zhang, Jing and En Mao (2016), “From Online Motivations to Ad Clicks and to Behavioral Intentions. An Empirical Study of Consumer Response to Social Media Advertising,” Psychology & Marketing, 33 (3), 155–64.
    Zhang, Ping (2013), Toward a Positive Design Theory: Principles for Designing Motivating Information and Communication Technology.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營管理英語碩士學位學程(IMBA)
    103933039
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103933039
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營管理英語碩士學程IMBA] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback