English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50808989      Online Users : 717
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/111295
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111295


    Title: 審計公費與高階經理團隊權益薪酬之研究
    A study on auditing fee ane the high-level manager team equity compensation
    Authors: 邵勇豪
    Contributors: 郭弘卿
    邵勇豪
    Keywords: 高階經理團隊
    權益薪酬計畫
    審計公費
    Executive equity-based compensation
    Audit fee
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-07-24 11:58:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 所有權與經營權分離已成了現今公司之常態,但因為高階經理人與股東利益目標並非一致而產生了代理問題。為解決代理問題,學者研究後提出能透過設立監督機制及權益薪酬計畫。然而權益薪酬僅能將兩者目標趨於一致,並非根本解決高階經理人可能因為自利而做出傷害公司之決策,又因為權益薪酬之價值與公司會計盈餘具有高度關聯,高階經理人仍有可能為了自利而投資高風險之標的或進行盈餘管理操弄會計盈餘。故本研究欲從審計公費之角度探討,當公司高階經理人領有權益薪酬時是否被會計師認定為企業風險較高。實證結果顯示,當高階經理團隊領有權益薪酬或其權益薪酬占總薪酬比重較高時,審計公費將較高。
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    林宇欣與沈文華,2014,財務預警指標、規模與審計公費關係之研究-公司治理觀點,商業現代化學刊,7(4),337-354。
    李啟華與郭翠菱,2014,獎酬契約與盈餘管理,輔仁管理評論,21(3), 23-47。
    廖秀梅、洪筱雯,2010,非審計服務、會計師任期與審計品質,當代會計,11(2),151-178。
    黃惠君、翁子涵,(2015),實質盈餘管理與會計師產業專業及審計公費之關聯性:公司管理階層對審計品質之認知,當代會計,16(2),211-249。
    張仲岳與曹美娟,2005,台灣上市公司審計公費之決定因素,當代會計, 6(2), 125-152。
    薛敏正、張瑀珊與高君慈,2008,公司自我選擇聘任會計師與審計公費,當代會計,9(2),167-200。
    薛敏正、鄭桂蕙與蕭莉芃,2015,權益價值高估對具品牌聲譽會計師事務所之選擇與審計公費之影響,當代會計,16(1),33-63。
    薛敏正、曾乾豪與張瑀珊,2012,個別會計師查核簽證家數與企業盈餘品質,中華會計學刊,第8卷第2期:217-256。
    蘇裕惠,2000,會計師事務所規模與審計公費關聯性之研究,中華會計學刊(1), 59-78。

















    二、英文文獻

    Bedard, J. C., and Johnstone, K. M. 2004. Earnings manipulation risk, corporate governance risk, and auditors` planning and pricing decisions. Accounting Review, 79(2), 277.
    Bell, T., Landsman, W., and Shackelford, D. 2001. Auditors` perceived business risk and audit fees: Analysis and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 35-43.
    Bell, T. B., Doogar, R., and Solomon, I. 2008. Audit labor usage and fees under business risk auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(4), 729-760.
    Bergstresser, D., and Philippon, T. 2006. CEO incentives and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(3), 511-529.
    Bitner, L. N., and Dolan, R. 1998. Does smoothing earnings add value? (includes related article on the Q-value test for smoothing behavior). Management Accounting (USA), 80(4), 44.
    Cheng, Q., and Warfield, T. D. 2005. Equity incentives and earnings management. Accounting Review, 80(2), 441-476.
    Choi, J.-H., Kim, C., Kim, J.-B., and Zang, Y. 2010. Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing, 29(1), 73-97.
    Efendi, J., Srivastava, A., and Swanson, E. P. 2007. Why do corporate managers misstate financial statements? The role of option compensation and other factors. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(3), 667-708.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532.
    Francis, J. R., and Simon, D. T. 1987. A test of audit pricing in the small-client segment of the U.S. audit market. The Accounting Review, 62(1), 145-157.
    Francis, J. R., and Stokes, D. J. 1986. Audit prices, product differentiation, and scale economies: Further evidence from The Australian Market. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(2), 383-393
    Gaver, J. J., Gaver, K. M., and Austin, J. R. 1995. Additional evidence on bonus plans and income management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(1), 3-28.
    Gul, F. A. 1999. Audit prices, product differentiation and economic equilibrium. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 18(1), 90-100.
    Harris, J., and P. Broomiley. 2007. Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organization Science, 18(3), 350-367.
    Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1), 85-107.
    Henderson, R. 1985. Compensation management: Rewarding performance. Virginia: Prentice-Hall company.
    Holthausen, R., Larcker, D., and Sloan, R. 1995. Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(1), 29.
    Murphy, K. J. 1985. Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1), 11-42.
    Palmrose, Z. V. 1986. Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 97-110.
    Pong, C. M., and Whittington, G. 1994. The determinants of audit fee: Some empirical models. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 21(8), 1071-1095.
    Shaw, K. W., and Zhang, M. H. 2010. Is CEO cash compensation punished for poor firm performance. Accounting Review, 85(3), 1065-1093.
    Simunic, D., and Stein, M. 1996. Reply: The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing, 15, 145-148.
    Simunic, D. A. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161-190.
    Turpen, R. 1995. Audit fees - What research tells us. The CPA Journal, 65(1), 54.
    Zerni, M. 2012. Audit partner specialization and audit fees: Some evidence from sweden. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 312-340.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    104353027
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104353027
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback