政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/110930
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51045551      Online Users : 935
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110930


    Title: 重新審視牟宗三的道德判斷與歷史判斷 – 從現象學的觀點來看
    Other Titles: A Rethinking of Mo Zongshan`s Reflection on ＂Moral Judgment and Historical Judgment＂: from the Viewpoint of Phenomenology
    Authors: 汪文聖
    Wang, Wen-Sheng
    Contributors: 哲學系
    Keywords: 道德判斷;歷史判斷;牟宗三;胡塞爾;海德格;漢娜鄂蘭;現象學
    Moral Judgment;Historical Judgment;Mo Zongshan;Husserl;Heidegger;Hannah Arendt;Phenomenology
    Date: 2016-10
    Issue Date: 2017-07-12 10:17:27 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 牟宗三在道德判斷與歷史判斷〉一文裡，對於陳同甫與朱子各自偏重非理性的生命與理性的道德，指出了兩者的不足處，從而主張朱子的道德判斷應引進歷史判斷。他提出在道德方面只是主觀之鑒別與批判，必須提昇至架構地思考客觀的政體與歷史，再而從動的觀點或升舉轉化的立場來進行歷史判斷。本文將從現象學的觀點來看牟宗三所提出的問題，一方面去闡明胡塞爾（Edmund Husserl）、海德格（Martin Heidegger）與漢娜鄂蘭（Hannah Arendt）對之有不同的立場與見解，另一方面去審視牟宗三對於陳與朱的超越如何可再做進一步的發展。
    In ＂Moral Judgment and Historical Judgment,＂ Mo Zongshan identifies the failure of Chan Tongpu and Zhuzi （who respectively emphasized the irrational life or rational morality） and maintains that Zhuzi should place historical judgment within moral judgment. Mo states that the mere subjective evaluation and critique based on morality must be raised to the level of structurally thinking of the objective polity and history. Only then can one infer an historical judgment from the dynamic and dialectic perspective. I will rethink the issue Mo reflects upon from the phenomenological point of view. On the one hand, I demonstrate the different positions and interpretations of Husserl, Heidegger and Arendt; on the other hand, I argue how Mo`s transcending of Chan and Zhuzi can be developed further. Moreover, Arendt`s contribution to the special meanings of historical judgment and moral judgment will be highlighted in this paper.
    Relation: 中央大學人文學報, 62, 49-78
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Philosophy] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    49-78.pdf1611KbAdobe PDF2398View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback