政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/110847

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/110847

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51149075 線上人數 : 854

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 地政學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/110847

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110847

題名:	臺北市生活設施水準對住宅價格之影響 The impacts of the levels of community facilities on housing prices in Taipei City
作者:	黃麟雅 Huang, Lin-Ya
貢獻者:	張金鶚江穎慧 Chang, Chin-Oh Chiang, Ying-Hui 黃麟雅 Huang, Lin-Ya
關鍵詞:	生活設施設施服務水準特徵價格分析分量迴歸 Community facilities The service level of facilities Hedonic housing analysis Quantile regression
日期:	2017
上傳時間:	2017-07-11 12:01:47 (UTC+8)
摘要:	住宅本身特性和鄰里環境為影響住宅價格高低之主要因素，環境特徵通因素常透過公共設施反映，設施越完善表示鄰里生活機能及可及性越高，產生正面效應使得住宅價格提升；鄰避設施產生的負面外部性導致居住品質下降，造成住宅價格降低。然現有文獻多數偏向針對特定的公共設施類型分析，相對少見到同時針對多樣設施進行全面性研究，缺乏生活設施面向的實證及設施服務水準衡量。本研究運用特徵價格理論結合地理資訊系統，界定多項重大設施與生活設施；以分群探討設施之量增趨勢對住宅總價影響，透過等級衡量生活設施服務水準，建構最小平方及分量迴歸模型，以對設施作全面性研究。本研究採用臺北市2011年7月至2015年9月不動產交易實價登錄樣本與設施資料為對象。實證結果顯示，住宅總價主要受交通便利性和開放空間效益影響，生活設施水準對總價為正向影響，顯示生活機能具有正面效益。設施影響係數依序為捷運站0.0774、主題公園0.0307、餐飲0.0283、大專院校0.0219、大型醫院0.0193、殯葬設施-0.0190、學校0.0124、市場0.0057、鄰里公園0.0042及便利商店-0.0018。本研究進而探討不同總價下的設施影響效果發現，隨著住宅總價從低到高，各項生活設施的影響下降，低總價住宅主要受到生活機能和開放空間等鄰里環境影響，設施的便利性大於可及性效益；高總價住宅以負面外部性、文教及開放空間效益和就醫便利為主要影響，設施的便利效益不顯著。 House pricing is strongly affected by its characteristics and neighborhood environment. Neighborhood characteristics are usually reflected by public facilities. The better the facilities are, the higher quality and convenience of the life results in a positive effect on housing price. The negative externalities of the NIMBY (not-in-my-back-yard) facilities lead to a decline in the quality of living and a reduction in housing prices. However, most of the existing literatures tend to focus on specific types of public facility. In this paper, more detailed study on the effects of overall facilities is proposed. In this research, the overall influence of facilities service level on house pricing is the focus. The proposed regression models are based on Hedonic price theory combined with geographic information system (GIS). Those overall facilities are categorized into two groups, important and community facilities. The provided different service levels of community facilities are defined. The clustering is used for evaluating the relationships between facility number and housing price. The real estate sales database in Taipei City from July 2012 to Sept. 2015 along with facilities is used for the evaluations. The evaluated results show that the total price is mainly affected by the convenience of transport and open space benefits, the service levels of community facilities have a positive effect. The impacts of the facilities are in the order of MRT, theme parks, restaurants, Universities, large hospitals, funeral facilities, schools, markets, neighborhood parks and convenience stores. Theme parks, the service level of community facilities and universities have higher impacts on those low-priced property while. funeral facilities, theme parks and large hospitals have higher impacts on high-priced one. One more finding is that the impacts of the service level of community facilities has declined with the increase in total housing prices. Low-priced property is mainly affected by the neighborhood environment and open space because facilities convenience is greater than the accessibility. High-priced property is mainly affected by the negative externalities, education, open space and access to medical care.
參考文獻:	中文參考文獻王良友，2011，「鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究-以大臺北地區為例」，成功大學都市計劃學系碩士論文，台南市。白崑成，『105年捷運常識 (含捷運系統概述) 』，台北：千華數位文化。宋豐荃，2013，「鄰近公園有助提升房價嗎?-大小公園對高低房價影響程度之研究」，政治大學地政學系碩士論文，台北市。李春長、游淑滿、張維倫，2012，「公共設施、環境品質與不動產景氣對住宅價格影響之研究─兼論不動產景氣之調節效果」，『住宅學報』，21(1)：67-87。李永展、何紀芳，1996，「台北地方生活圈都市服務設施之鄰避效果」，『都市與計劃』，23(1)：95-116。李泳龍、黃宗誠、戴政安、李善將，2009，「醫學中心對鄰近住宅環境影響之研究」，『建築與規劃學報』，10(2)：75-93。林祖嘉、林素菁，1992，「臺灣地區環境品質與公共設施對住宅價格與房租影響之分析」，『住宅學報』，(1)：21-45。林祖嘉、馬毓駿，2007，「特徵方程式大量估價法在台灣不動產市場之應用」，『住宅學報』，16(2)：1-22。林峰田，1997，「公共設施檢討空間分析方法」，『都市與計劃』，24(2)：171-192。林楨家、黃至豪，2003，「台北捷運營運前後沿線房地屬性特徵價格之變化」，『運輸計劃季刊』，32(4)，777- 800。洪得洋、林祖嘉，1999，「臺北市捷運系統與道路寬度對房屋價格影響之研究」，『住宅學報』，8，47–67。柯柏戎，2012，「都會區購屋者對自用住宅環境設施需求之研究」，中央大學營建管理研究所碩士論文，桃園市。紀雲曜、李上妤、葉光毅，2004，「公共設施最適服務／影響距離之評估模式」，『建築與規劃學報』，5(2)：150-177。莊惠雯、林憲德、沈之中，2012，「探討城鄉社區設施服務距離之差異研究」，『建築學報』，(80)：131-148。曾佳琪，2011，「特定公共設施對住宅價格的影響－以台中市南屯區為例」，中興大學應用經濟學系所學位論文，台中市。陳奉瑤、楊依蓁，2007，「個別估價與大量估價之準確性分析」，『住宅學報』，16(2)：67-83。楊宗憲、蘇倖慧，2011，「迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究」，『住宅學報』，20(2)：61-80。許添本、趙晉緯，2007，「人行空間服務水準綜合評估之研究」，『規劃學報』，(34)：89-111。張怡文、江穎慧、張金鶚，2009，「分量迴歸在大量估價模型之應用─非典型住宅估價之改進」，『都市與計劃』，36：281-304。張景盛、陳素月、藍宜亭、黃俊英，2013，「高雄地區住宅特徵與住宅環境的重視程度對居住滿意度之影響」，『建築與規劃學報』，14(1)：33-46。游適銘、張金鶚，2010，「成本法估價偏誤之探討─分量迴歸應用」，『住宅學報』，19(2)：81-105。彭建文、楊宗憲、楊詩韻，2009，「捷運系統對不同區位房價影響分析－以營運階段為例」，『運輸計劃季刊』，38(3)：275-296 戴國正，2011，「大眾捷運系統對房價影響效果之再檢視」，政治大學地政研究所碩士論文，台北市。黃文、王正林，2015，『利用R語言打通大數據的經脈』，臺北市：佳魁資訊。中華民國住宅學會，105年上半年住宅需求動向調查，頁9-19。外文參考文獻 Anselin, L.,1995, “Local indicators of spatial association—LISA”, Geographical analysis, 27(2): 93-115. Asadi-Shekari, Z., Moeinaddini, M., and Zaly Shah, M., 2013, “Non-motorised Levelof Service: Addressing Challenges in Pedestrian and Bicycle Level of Service”, Transport Reviews, 33(2): 166-194. Anderson, S. T.,and West, S. E., 2006, “Open space, residential property values, and spatial context”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(6): 773-789. Armstrong, K J.,Rodriguez, D. A., 2006, “An Evaluation of the Accessibility Benefits of Commuter Rail in Eastern Massachusetts Using Spatial Hedonic Price Functions”,Transportation,33(1):21-43. Bolitzer, B., and Netusil, N. R., 2000, “The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon”, Journal of Environmental Management, 59(3):185-193. Bhuyan, P. K., and Nayak, M. S., 2013, “A Review on Level of Service Analysis of Urban Streets”, Transport Reviews, 33(2): 219-238. Boris A. P., Yakov, O. and Larissa F., 2005, “Factors Affecting Housing Modifications and Housing Pricing: A Case Study of Four Residential Neighborhoods in Haifa, Israel”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 27(4): 371-407 Bowes, D. R.,Ihlanfeldt, K. R.,2001, “Identifying the Impacts of Rail Transit Stations on Residential Property Values”, Journal of Urban Economics,50:1-25. Chiang, Ying-Hui, Peng, Ti-Ching, and Chang, Chin-Oh., 2015, “The nonlinear effect of convenience stores on residential property prices: A case study of Taipei, Taiwan”, Habitat International, 46: 82-90. Chau, K. W., Wong, S. K., and Yiu, C.Y., 2004, “The value of provision of balcany in apartments in Hong Kong.” Property Management. 22(3): 250-264 Emily Talen, 2003, “Neighborhoods as service providers: a methodology for valuating pedestrian access”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30: 181-200 Fisher, J. D., Smith, B. C., Stern, J., and Webb, R. B., 2006, “Analysis of economic depreciation for multi-family propty”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 27(4): 1-24 Jim, C. Y., and Chen, W. Y., 2006, “Impacts of urban environmental elements on residential housing prices in Guangzhou (China)”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4): 422-434. Jim, C. Y., and Chen, W. Y., 2009, “Value of scenic views: hedonic assessment of private housing in Hong Kong.”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 91(4): 226-234 Kong, F., Yin, H., and Nakagoshi, N., 2007, “Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: A case study in Jinan City, China”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 79(3–4):240-252. Koenker, Roger and Bassett Jr, Gilbert., 1978, “Regression quantiles”, Econometrica:journal of the Econometric Society, 33-50. Koenker, R and Hallock, K., 2001,“Quantile regression”, Journal of Economic Perspectives,15(4),143-156. Li, M. M., and Brown, H. J., 1980, “Micro-Neighborhood Externalities and Hedonic Housing Prices”, Land Economics, 56(2): 125-141 Luttik, J., 2000, “The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by property prices in Netherlands”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(3): 161-167 Murphy, K., Machine Learning: a Probabilistic Perspective, MIT Press, 2012. Oded, B., and Qian, W., 2008, “Locating a Semi-Obnoxious Facility with Expropriation,” Computer & Operations Research, 35(2):392-403. Peng, Ti-Ching., and Chiang, Ying-Hui., 2015, “The non-linearity of hospitals’ proximity on property prices: experiences from Taipei, Taiwan”, Journal of Property Research, 32(4): 341-361. Raymond, Y. and Love, P. E., 2000, “Measuring residential property values in Hong Kong.”, Property Management, 18(5): 366-374. Rosen, Sherwin, 1974, “Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition”, Journal of political economy, 82(1): 34-55. Shen, G., 2002, “Measuring Accessibility of Housing to Public–community Facilities Using Geographical Information Systems”, Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 14(3): 235-255. Sirmans, G. S., Macpherson, D. A., and Zietz, E. N., 2005, “The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models”, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(1):3-43. Sirmans, G. S., MacDonald, L.,Macpherson, D. A., & Zietz, E. N. 2006, “The value of housing characteristics: a meta analysis”, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 33(3): 215-240 Tsai, Shu-Ling and Kuan, Chung-Ming, 2003, “Assortative Mating and Income Inequality in Taiwan: A Quantile Regression Approach” Paper presented at the presentation at the conference “Social Inequality, Family, and Intergenerational Transfer” of the Research Committee on Social stratification and Social Mobility of the International Sociological Association (ISA-RC28), held at the University of Tokyo, Japan, on March. Zietz, J., Zietz, E. N., and Sirmans, G. S., 2008, “Determinants of House Prices: A Quantile Regression Approach”, Journal of Real Estate Finance And Economics, 37(4): 317-333. 綱頁參考文獻林豐博等著，「2011 年臺灣公路容量手冊」，交通部運輸研究所。http://thcs.iot.gov.tw:8080/THCS/uploads/tad_uploader/tmp/31/THCS_handbook.pdf，取用日期：2017 年 5 月30 日。內政部，104年11月25日，修正不動產說明書應記載及不得記載事項。http://glrs.moi.gov.tw/NewsContent.aspx?id=2626，取用日期：2017 年 2 月18日。行政院主計總處，104 年家庭收支調查報告。http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/fies/doc/result/104.pdf，取用日期：2017 年 4 月9日。中華民國統計資訊網家庭收支，2015年飲食費占消費支出比率(％)。http://statdb.dgbas.gov.tw/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9.asp，取用日期：2017 年 4 月 9 日。中央研究院，「民國 93-97 年度國民營養健康狀況變遷調查」報告書，行政院衛福部委託研究計畫，https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/group/sciitem/3/1302，取用日期：2017年4 月10 日。公平交易委員會，「103年連鎖式便利商店經營概況調查」。 http://1950.tycg.gov.tw/news/news/upt.asp?p0=4495，取用日期：2017 年 4 月 10 日。經濟部統計處，2016年6月27日，產業經濟統計簡訊。https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/bulletin/Bulletin.aspx?kind=9&html=1&men u_id=18808&bull_id=2504，取用日期：2017 年 4 月10 日。內政部營建署，都市計畫法，第四十二條。http://www.cpami.gov.tw/chinese/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=10706&Itemid=57，取用日期：2017 年 4 月28 日。內政部營建署，雙語詞彙對照，社區設施。http://www.cpami.gov.tw/chinese/index.php?option=com_content&view=article &id=100&Itemid=86，取用日期：2017 年 4 月28 日。內政部營建署，都市計畫定期通盤檢討實施辦法，第三章　公共設施用地之檢討基準。 http://www.cpami.gov.tw/chinese/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=10710&Itemid=57，取用日期：2017 年 5 月2 日。
描述:	碩士國立政治大學地政學系 104257024
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1042570241
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[地政學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
024101.pdf	3080Kb	Adobe PDF2	50	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋