English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51730339      Online Users : 342
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/110800
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110800


    Title: 考量商品貿易之匯率報酬評價
    Determinant of exchange rate return-considering commodity trade
    Authors: 王可佳
    Wang, Ke Jia
    Contributors: 林建秀
    Lin, Chien Hsiu
    王可佳
    Wang, Ke Jia
    Keywords: 匯率報酬
    利差交易
    商品貿易
    Exchange rate return
    Carry trade
    Commodity trade
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-07-11 11:30:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究欲探討國家商品貿易特性在匯率報酬評價中扮演的角色,決定匯率報酬的因素非常多,包含利率、市場波動、國際貿易及國家政治等非常廣泛的因素,而國家商品貿易特性也會是影響匯率報酬評價的可能因素之一。本研究以「進口比率」(Import Ratios) 衡量國家的商品貿易特性,也以該數值建構投資組合。研究結果發現,去除商品貿易特性特殊之國家後,進口比例(Import Ratio)越高之投資組合,其遠期外匯貼水也偏高,且外匯超額報酬也隨之遞增。
    在Ready, Roussanov, and Ward(2013)論文中認為,國家的商品貿易特性是造成不同國家利率高低差異的原因,所以該作者認為國家商品貿易特性極有可能是利差交易背後的原因。然而,本研究的Fama-Macbeth 兩步驟橫斷面迴歸實證結果發現,國家的商品貿易特性確實是造成國家利率差異的因素之一,但利差交易背後的風險背後的因素,雖然包含國家商品貿易因素,但仍包含其他因素,且商品貿易因子(IMX)無法取代利差交易因子(HML)在外匯超額報酬評價模型中的角色。
    此外,本研究亦嘗試在Lustig所提出之市場因子(RX)和利差交易因子(HML)的兩因子模型中,再額外加入商品貿易因子(IMX),構成匯率評價的三因子模型,但研究結果發現不論是在遠期外匯貼水投資組合或商品貿易投資組合中,三因子模型都沒有優於兩因子模型。
    There are many factors in determinant of exchange rate returns, such as interest rates, market volatility, international trade and politics. The purpose of this research is considering commodity trade in the pricing model of excess return of currency market. This research use “Import Ratios” to measure the characteristic of different countries’ commodity trade. We use import ratios to construct “Import Ratio Sort Portfolio”. After removing the countries which commodity trade characteristics are special, we could see when import ratios is higher, the forward discount and exchange rate return are also higher in import ratio sort portfolio.
    Ready, Roussanov, and Ward(2013) thought the commodity trade is the reason that cause interest rate differences between countries. In this research, the result of Fama-Macbeth two-step regression show that commodity trade is one of the reasons that cause interest rate differences. It means that there are other risks behind carry trade. In the pricing model of excess return of currency market, HML factor can’t be replaced by IMX factor.
    We also try to construct three-factor model, which consider excess return, carry trade, and commodity trade simultaneously. But the result shows that three-factor model can not have better explanatory power than Lustig, Roussanov, and Verdelhan(2011)’s two-factor model.
    Reference: Anzuini, A., & Fornari, F. (2012). Macroeconomic determinants of carry trade activity. Review of International Economics, 20(3), 468-488.
    Asness, C. S., Moskowitz, T. J., & Pedersen, L. H. (2013). Value and momentum everywhere. The Journal of Finance, 68(3), 929-985.
    Burnside, C., Eichenbaum, M., & Rebelo, S. (2011). Carry trade and momentum in currency markets. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ., 3(1), 511-535.
    Burnside, C., Eichenbaum, M., Kleshchelski, I., & Rebelo, S. (2006). The returns to currency speculation (No. w12489). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of political economy, 81(3), 607-636.
    Ferraro, D., Rogoff, K. S., & Rossi, B. (2012). Can oil prices forecast exchange rates? (No. w17998). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Heath, A., Galati, G., & McGuire, P. (2007). Evidence of carry trade activity.
    Lustig, H., & Verdelhan, A. (2007). The cross section of foreign currency risk premia and consumption growth risk. The American economic review, 97(1), 89-117.
    Lustig, H., Roussanov, N., & Verdelhan, A. (2011). Common risk factors in currency markets. Review of Financial Studies, 24(11), 3731-3777..
    Menkhoff, L., Sarno, L., Schmeling, M., & Schrimpf, A. (2012). Currency momentum strategies. Journal of Financial Economics, 106(3), 660-684.
    Ready, R., Roussanov, N., & Ward, C. (2013). Commodity trade and the carry trade: A tale of two countries (No. w19371). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融學系
    104352014
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104352014
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[金融學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    201401.pdf1310KbAdobe PDF228View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback