政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/106897
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113485/144472 (79%)
造访人次 : 51390220      在线人数 : 666
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/106897


    题名: 專利法在基因科技中的適用及解釋: 以生技產業創新發展政策思維為導向
    The application and explanation of patent law in biotechnology : a biotechnology innovation and industrial development policy-oriented approach
    作者: 葉俊宏
    Yeh, Chun-Hung
    贡献者: 沈宗倫
    Shen, Chung-Lun
    葉俊宏
    Yeh, Chun-Hung
    关键词: 基因科技
    生物科技
    生物技術
    生技產業
    基因序列
    基因改良之生物材料
    基因檢測
    基因治療
    胚胎幹細胞
    學研機構
    百慕達原則
    拜杜法案
    科技創新法案
    專利法
    專利保護
    專利近用
    政策
    專利適格性
    基因專利
    產業利用性
    進步性
    據以實施性
    書面揭露要件
    專利濫用
    競爭法
    專利搭售
    生物材料移轉協議
    延展性授權金
    專利集管
    標準必要專利
    試驗免責
    強制授權
    關鍵設施理論
    不對稱管制
    介入權
    Biotechnology
    Genetic engineering
    Biotech industry
    Gene patent
    Genetic modified material
    Genetic testing
    Gene therapy
    Embryonic stem cell
    Academic and research institution
    Bermuda principle
    The Bayh-Dole act
    Patent law
    Patent protection
    Patent access
    Policy
    Patentability
    Subject matter
    Patent eligibility
    Useful
    Nonobviousness
    Enablement
    Written description
    Patent misuse
    Antitrust law
    Competition law
    Tying arrangement
    Materials transfer agreement
    Reach-through royalty
    Patent pool
    Standard essential patent
    Experimental use
    Compulsory license
    Essential facilities doctrine
    Asymmetric regulation
    March-in right
    日期: 2017
    摘要: 基因科技的研發成果除了得做為研究工具外,終端產品服務如基因檢測或基因治療等則皆具有醫療功能效益,不僅有高度潛能發展成個人化醫療的應用,更有助於減緩國家於健康財政的支出負擔。此外,以基因科學為技術基礎的生物科技產業,亦多被各國列為重點發展的產業類別,且現今尚處於持續向上攀升的態勢。然而,有鑑於基因科技同時具備生物不確定性和累積創新特性,造成專利法在其發展上雖扮演極重要的推動角色,但因為成果多具有上位且必要近用的性質,而與專利法所保障的發明性質以及所享有排他權能呈現某程度上的扞格牴觸,進而在實際適用上產生諸多疑義和問題。是以,究竟如何透過調整和再造專利法和相關法規範的解釋,解決現行適用上的問題,並且增進基因科技的研發動能,促成基礎研究的承接和鼓勵後續創新和商業化,最終帶動整體生技產業的蓬勃發展,實乃本論文的問題核心和研究目標。
    對此,本論文將聚焦於基因科技研發成果的專利保護要件解釋上的疑義,以及生技專利的授權實務所面臨的困境應如何處理此二議題,並以美國的法制規範和實務見解作為討論模板,透過文獻回顧和比較分析法,輔以技術評價、產業影響評估和政策評析,提出一整體宏觀性的最佳政策模型,且逐一具體套用至各該政策槓桿的解釋和運用中。是以,本論文乃嘗試透過一次到位的方式,使專利適用於基因科技發明上,得直接調整成最佳的適用狀態,以節省逐步微調或立法再造的成本和不效率,並且真正達成生技產業創新發展之目標。
    首先,於第二章詳盡介紹基因序列、基因改良之生物材料、基因檢測和治療方法,以及胚胎幹細胞此四個研發領域的技術內容,以及基因科學在產官學的互動實務和發展現況,並點出歷經誘因機制的轉變所生的適用疑義和近用問題。其次,在第三章則是先探求經濟政策擬定和執行的法理基礎,並闡釋專利法和相關法制具有經濟政策容納性和得依據技術特性予以調整的性質。再者,依憑上開理論基礎提出一較佳的政策模型,即區分專利保護和專利行使階段,前者的專利保護要件的解釋上,應貫徹貼近技術實務和充分誘因保障的政策思維。並且挑選爭議性較高的專利適格性、產業利用性、進步性和據以實施性,以及附隨相關的書面揭露要件,在第四章具體討論適用在本論文所選擇的技術子領域的專利保護要件判斷上,進而提供全面性的實務見解認識和橫向的比較基礎加以介紹和評析。相對的,後者的部分則是依據現行仍維持尚屬公開的授權風氣,僅需採取低度的管制密度的合宜近用政策思維,以維持市場具備適度的自主型塑空間。因此,在第五章就專利近用相關的爭議類型所涉及的專利濫用、相關授權約款細節、授權促進措施、所能主張的試驗免責範疇,以及強制授權、法定授權和介入權的討論中,透過立基於本論文提出的政策模型,加以檢視實務見解和競爭法指導原則所闡釋的合法判斷之妥適性,並且逐一選擇合適的技術子類型作為評論的模板,提供縱向的具體應用情形評估。
    最後,在第六章結論的部分,除了重申此政策模型的適宜性,並嘗試將此模型套用至歐洲和我國的專利法和相關法制的解釋和適用上,並提出相關革新的建議,促成各國的專利法制的實際適用均得引介此政策模型,進而成功促成各國生技產業創新發展之目的。
    The biotechnology inventions can serve as research tools as well as some end services such as genetic testing or gene therapy. Not only can the biotechnology inventions apply to personal medical treatment, but they can also alleviate the burden on public health subsidization of government. Besides, the biotechnology industry is growing prosperously and its development is also on the top priority of many countries. To deal with the biotechnology uncertainties, patent law ensures great incentives in the innovation of biotechnology R&D. Nevertheless, the nature of the biotechnology inventions, which is hard to distinguish with natural phenomena or is somehow essential for follow-up improvements, makes it hard to become the subject matter of patent law, and conflicts with patent’s exclusive right. In order to spur the innovations of biotechnology and commercialization of basic research, the core issues are how to solve the problems mentioned above.
    The dissertation focuses on two parts. One is the adjustment of patent law interpretations in biotechnology inventions’ patentability. The other is the solution to the difficulty of the biotechnology patent access. The dissertation intends to propose an optimal policy model, which can be applied to policy levers in patent law interpretations concretely, through literature reviewing, technical analysis, industrial impact assessment and policy consideration of United States’ legal system and related court opinions.
    The optimal policy model divides patent law into two parts: patent protection and patent using. For patent protection, the explanations of patent law should take technical practices into considerations and ensure ample incentives for biotechnology research and development. For patent using, since the licensing practice of patented inventions still keeps sharing and common in the marketplace nowadays, only loose regulations are needed to ensure the useful access to patented inventions.
    Chapter four introduces the application of the model to specific subfields, including related court opinions and optimal interpretations of invention’s patentability, useful, nonobviousness, enablement and written description. Chapter five discusses about various types of the patent access controversies, inclusive of patent misuse, licensing clause, licensing-facilitated measurement, research exemption, compulsory licensing and march-in right issues. Still, by applying the model to selected subfield inventions, chapter five evaluates the appropriateness of court opinions and antitrust guidelines. Finally, the conclusion restates the appropriateness of the policy model, and tries to influence the interpretations and applications of Europe and Taiwan patent law.
    Overall, the dissertation tries to optimize the interpretations and applications of patent law once and for all in order to promote the biotechnology industry developments and reduce the cost and inefficiency of continual further legislations.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法律科際整合研究所
    101652011
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101652011
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[法律科際整合研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    201101.pdf3461KbAdobe PDF21009检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈