Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/106801
|
Title: | 論瑪格麗特‧愛特伍《瘋狂亞當三部曲》中新自由主義治理論述,裸命,生命-形式及無身份 Neo-liberal governmentality:bare life, form-of-life and (non)-identity in Margaret Atwood`s MaddAddam trilogy |
Authors: | 鄧安廷 Teng, An-Ting |
Contributors: | 邱彥彬 Chiou, Yen-Bin 鄧安廷 Teng, An-Ting |
Keywords: | <<瘋狂亞當三部曲>> 瑪格麗特.愛特伍 新自由主義 治理性 裸命 生命-形式 無身份 MaddAddam trilogy Margaret Atwood Neoliberalism Governmentality Bare life Form-of-life (Non)-identity |
Date: | 2017 |
Issue Date: | 2017-03-01 17:00:00 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 瑪格麗特‧愛特伍的《瘋狂亞當三部曲》描繪了當代讀者所熟悉的世界: 一個受新自由主義浪潮席捲的社會。當政府權力被龐大財團架空,自由國家的民主核心價值早已崩解。 本篇論文的論點延伸自Chris Vials 的文章,並試圖以新自由主義統治論述來解釋小說中民主與極權融為一體的情況。第一章解釋新經濟思維使個人與社會產生疏離,以統治極端分化的社會階層。第二章則闡述小說中的國家已陷入例外狀態,法律受到懸置,而圍牆的設立強化了排除生命的機制並且產生 “裸命”。在最後的章節將探討上帝的園丁會 “生命-形式” 的革命以及《瘋狂亞當》的主角澤伯所展現的 “無身份” 抵抗的可能性。 如同書中角色,身處於當代的讀者正受到這股 “未來的浪潮” 推進向前卻同時又受到過去的夢靨所困。世界大戰、猶太人集中營不只是已過去的歷史事實,他們以不同形式再現且縈繞不去。如何撿拾過去的傷痛與錯誤,承接死去之人的意志正是我們必須肩負的責任。 In Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam trilogy, the author imagines a near future that is too familiar for the reader who live in the contemporary period, a neoliberal society. Through the depiction of a hollowed-out nation replaced by a giant consortium, she lays bare a truth that democracy is going to collapse. Based on Chris Vials’ article, “Margaret Atwood’s Dystopic Fiction and the Contradictions of Neoliberal Freedom,” this thesis furthers to elaborate the integration of democratic regime and totalitarianism by discourse of neoliberal governance: the neoliberal rationality alienates individuals, uniting the divided social stratifications. In the second part, I suggest that the nation falls into an anarchy since it has already entered into a state of exception, which gives rise to “bare life.” The exclusion mechanism is represented by the construction of “the Walls.” The third chapter aims to discuss the possibility of resisting the new form of sovereign power in practice of the God’s Gardeners about how to live “form-of-life” and politics of “(non)-identity” deployed by Zeb, the protagonist of MaddAddam. Like the characters, we stand in the intersection of the “Wave of future” and the recurring nightmare in the past. Global wars and concentration camp are not only historical facts but recurring events. It is our responsibility to recall the memory, remember the pain, and inherit the will of the dead. |
Reference: | Agamben, Giorgio. Means without End: Notes on Politics. Trans. Vincenzo Binetti and Cesare Casarino. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2000. Print. ---. The Coming Community. Trans. Michael Hardt. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1993. Print. ---. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: U of Stanford P, 1998. Print. ---. State of Exception. Trans. Kevin Attell. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2005. Print. ---. Profanations: Collected Essay in Philosophy. Ed. and trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. New York: U of Stanford P, 1999. Print. ---. The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-life. Trans. Adam Kotsko. California: U of Stanford P, 2013. Print. Atwood, Margaret. Oryx and Crake. New York: Anchor Books, 2003. Print. ---. The Year of the Flood. New York: Anchor Books, 2009. Print. ---. MaddAddam. New York: Nan A. Talese/Doubleday, 2013. Print. ---. The Handmaid’s Tale. New York: Anchor, 1998. Print. ---. Interview by Ed Finn. “An Interview with Margaret Atwood.” Slate.com. 6 March. 2012. Web. ---. “Why I Wrote MaddAddam.” Wattpad. Web. 20 Oct. 2015. Barkan, Joshua. “Use Beyond Value: Giorgio Agamben and A Critique of Capitalism.” Rethinking Marxism. 21-2 (2009): 243-59. 4 Nov, 2016. Berardi, Franco ‘bifo.’ Heroes: Mass Murder and Suicide. New York: Verso, 2015. Print. Behrent, Michael. C.. “Liberalism without Humanism: Michel Foucault and Free-Market Creed, 1976-1979.” Foucault and Neoliberalism. Ed. Daniel Zamora and Michael C. Behrent. Oxford: Polity Press, 2015. 63-84. Print. Bouson, J. Brooks. “It’s Game over Forever: Atwood’s Satiric Vision of a Bioengineered Posthuman Future in Oryx and Crake.” Margaret Atwood. Ed. Harold. Bloom. New York: Bloom’s Literary Criticism, 2009. Print. Buck-Moss, Susan. “Mythic History: Fetish.” The Dialectics of Seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991. Print. Cooke, Grayson. “Technics and the Human at Zero-hour: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” Canadian Literature, 31-2 (2006): 63-83. Dardot, Pierre., and Christian Laval. The New Way of the World. Trans. Gregory Elliot. London: Verso, 2013. Deleuze, Gilles. “Postscript on the Societies of Control.” JSTOR, 59 (1992): 3-7. ---. Foucault. Ed. and trans. Seán Hand. London: Athlone Press, 1988. Print. Foucault, Michel. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1977-78. Ed. Michel Senellart. Trans. Graham Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. Print. ---. “Lives of Infamous Men.” The Essential Foucault: Selections from the Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Ed. Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose. New York: New Press, 2003. Print. ---. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College De France. Ed. Arnold I. Davidson. Trans. Graham Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. Print. ---. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin, 1991. Print. Griffiths, Anthony. “Genetics According to Oryx and Crake.” Canadian Literature, 181 (2004): 192-95. Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: U of Oxford P, 2005. Print. ---. The New Imperialism. Oxford: U of Oxford P, 2003. Print Hardt, Michel., and Antonio Negri. Empire. Cambridge: U of Harvard P, 2000. Print. Hardt, Michel. “The Withering of Civil Society.” Social Text, 45 (1995): 27-44. 黃, 嬿霖. The Regime of Bio-power: Resistance and the Care of the Self in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake. MA Thesis. Kaushiung Normal University. 2014. Print. Howells, Coral Ann., editor. “Margaret Atwood`s Dystopian Visions: The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. New York: U of Cambridge P, 2006. 161-175. Print. ---. Margaret Atwood. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Print. Ingersoll, Earl G. “Survival in Margaret Atwood’s Novel Oryx and Crake.” Margaret Atwood. 127-142. Print. Labudová, Katarina. “Power, Pain, and Manipulation in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood.” Brno Studies in English, 36-1 (2010): 135-46. Lemke, Thomas. “Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique.” Rethinking Marxism, 14-3 (2002): 49-64. ---. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. Trans. Eric Frederick Trump. New York: U of New York P, 2011. Print. ---. “‘The Birth of Bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the College De France on Neo-liberal Governmentality.” Economy and Society, 30-2 (2001): 190-207. ---. “Foucault, Politics and Failure.” Foucault, Biopolitics, and Governmentality. Ed. Jakob Nilsson and Sven-Olov Wallenstein. Huddinge: U of Södertörn P, 2103. Miller, Keith. “How Important Was Oil in World War II?” History News Network. Web. Ojakangas, Mika. “Impossible Dialogue on Bio-power.” Foucault Studies, 2 (2005): 5-28. Oksala, Johanna. “Neoliberalism and Biopolitical Governmentality.” Foucault, Biopolitics, and Governmentality. Ed. Jakob Nilsson and Sven-Olov Wallenstein. Stockholm: Södertörn, 2013. Passavant, Paul A.. “The Contradictory State of Giorgio Agamben.” Political Theory. 35-2 (2007): 147-74. 1 Apr, 2016. Patankar, Prachi and Ahilan Kadirgamar. “Where Next for Occupy Wall Street?” The Guardian. Web. Prozorov, Sergei. Foucault, Freedom and Sovereignty. England: Ashgate, 2007. Print. Negri, Antonio. The Politics of Subversion: A Manifesto for the Twenty-first Century. Trans. James Newell. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989. Print. Read, Jason. “A Genealogy of Homo-Economicus: Neoliberalism and the Production of Subjectivity.” Foucault Studies, 6 (2009): 25-36. Rehmann, Jan. “The Unfulfilled Promise of the Late Foucault and Foucaudian ‘Govermentality’ Studies.” Foucault and Neoliberalism. 134-158. Print. Schotten, C. Heike. “Against Totalitarianism: Agamben, Foucault, and the Politics of Critique.” Foucault Studies, 20 (2015): 155-179. Singh, Nikhil. “The Afterlife of Fascism.” South Atlantic Quarterly, 105-1 (2006): 71-93. 8 Nov. 2015. Somacarrera, Pilar “Power politics: Power and Identity.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. 43-57. Print. Vials, Chris. “Margaret Atwood’s Dystopic Fiction and the Contradictions of Neoliberal Freedom.” Textual Practice, 29-2 (2015): 235-54. Huang, Yi-Chuan. Reading Biotechnology: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake. MA Thesis. Tsing Hua University. 2009. Print. Yuhas, Alan. “Nato Commander: Isis ‘Spreading Like Cancer’ Among Refugees.” Theguardian. Web. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 英國語文學系 102551014 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1025510141 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [英國語文學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
014101.pdf | 2023Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 455 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|