政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/106387
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113324/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51148288      Online Users : 856
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/106387


    Title: 審計委員會特性與新式查核報告揭露透明度之關聯性研究
    On the association between audit committee and the transparency of expanded auditor report
    Authors: 李孟庭
    Lee, Meng Ting
    Contributors: 陳宇紳
    李孟庭
    Lee, Meng Ting
    Keywords: 新式查核報告
    審計委員會
    關鍵查核事項
    expanded audit report
    audit committee
    key audit matter
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-02-08 16:32:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自金融風暴以來,公司投資者及其他利害關係人認為以往千篇一律之查核報 告形式已不再符合需求,開始要求會計師能提供更攸關且更深入之資訊。為符合利害關係人之期待及需求,會計師查核報告正歷經長久以來最重大的改變。英國 財務報告理事會(Financial Reporting Council)於2013年率先發佈新的會計師查核報告準則,對會計師查核報告格式與要素之重大改革作出回應。新式查核報告中, 影響層面最廣為要求會計師於查核報告中溝通關鍵查核事項(Key Audit Matter), 其主要目的在於讓會計師面臨的查核風險與專業判斷能更透明的呈現出來,強化 投資人對受查者財務資訊的信心。規範中強調會計師與治理單位之溝通,因此, 作為治理單位中與會計師溝通並處理會計原則使用爭議之審計委員會,其重要性 不言可喻。綜上,本研究探討審計委員會特性與新式查核報告中針對關鍵查核事 項揭露透明度之關聯性,根據實證結果,審計委員會獨立性確實有助於提升會計 師於查核報告揭露之透明度,且當樣本公司為由非四大會計師事務所查核、高股 價淨值比及非金融產業時,效果更加明顯。
    Reference: Abbott, L., S. Parker, G. Peters. 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(1): 69–87.
    Abbott L., S. Parker, G. Peters, K. Raghunandan. 2003. The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (2): 1–5.
    Abraham, S. and P. Cox. 2007. Analysing the determinants of narrative risk information in UK FTSE 100 annual reports. The British Accounting Review 39 (3):227-248.
    Anderson, R. C., S. A. Mansi, and D. M. Reeb. 2004. Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 : 315–342
    Backof, A., K. Bowlin, and B. Goodson. 2014. Mandatory emphasis paragraphs, clarifying language, and juror assessments of auditor liability. Working paper, University of Virginia and The University of Mississippi.
    Beasley, M. S., J. V. Carcello, D. R. Hermanson, and T. L. Neal. 2009. The audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research 26(1):65–122.
    Bédard, J., S. M. Chtourou and L. Courteau. 2004. The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23 (2): 13-35.
    _______, P. Coram, R. Espahbodi, and T. J. Mock. 2016. Does recent academic research support changes to audit reporting standards? Accounting Horizons 30(2): 255-275.
    Boolaky, P. K., and R. Quick. 2016. Bank directors` perceptions of expanded auditor`s reports. International Journal of Auditing 20(2):158–174.
    Botosan, C. 1997. Disclosure Level and the Cost of Equity Capital. The Accounting Review 72(3): 323-349.
    Brasel, K., M. Doxey, J. Grenier, and A. Reffett. 2016. Risk disclosure preceding negative outcomes: The effects of reporting critical audit matters on judgments of auditor liability. The Accounting Review 91 (5): 1345–1362.
    Bruynseels, L., and E. Cardinaels. 2014. The audit committee: Management watchdog or personal friend of the CEO? The Accounting Review 89 (1): 113–145.
    Cade, N. and F. Hodge. 2014. The effect of expanding the audit report on managers` communication openness. Working paper, University of Washington.
    Carcello, J. , D. Hermanson, T. Neal, and R. A. Riley. 2002. Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research19(3) : 365–384.
    _______, and T. Neal. 2000. Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review 75(4): 453-467.
    _______, and _______. 2003. Audit Committee Characteristics and Auditor Dismissals following “New” Going‐Concern Reports. The Accounting Review: 78(1): 95-117.
    Christensen, B. E., S. M. Glover, and C. J. Wolfe. 2014. Do critical audit matter paragraphs in the audit report change nonprofessional investors’ decision to invest? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 33 (4): 71–93.
    Cohen, J. R., L. M. Gaynor, G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. Wright. 2011. The impact on auditor judgments of CEO influence on audit committee independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (4): 129–147.
    _______, G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. Wright. 2010. Corporate governance in the post-Sarbanes-Oxley Era: Auditors’ experiences. Contemporary Accounting Research 27 (3): 751–786.
    Collier, P., and A. Gregory. 1996. Audit committee effectiveness and the audit fee. The European Accounting Review 5(2): 177-198.
    Conyon, M.J., and L. He. 2011. Executive compensation and corporate governance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance 17(4): 1158–75.
    DeFond, M.L., R. N. Hann, and X. Hu. 2005. Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of Accounting Research 43: 153–194.
    _______, and J. Jiambalvo. 1991. Incidence and Circumstances of Accounting Errors. The Accounting Review 66(3): 643-655.
    _______, and J. Zhang. 2014. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 58 (2): 275–326.
    DeZoort, F., and S. Salterio. 2001. The effects of corporate governance experience and financial-reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee members` judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 20 (2): 31-47.
    Dhaliwal, D., V. Naiker, and F. Navissi. 2006. Audit committee financial expertise, corporate governance and accruals quality: An empirical analysis. Working Paper: University of Arizona.
    _______,_______, and _______. 2010. The association between accruals quality and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of expertise on audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research 27(3): 787-827.
    Dye, R. 1993. Auditing standards, legal liability and auditor wealth. Journal of Political Economy 101: 887-914.
    Eng, L., Y. Mak. 2003. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22: 325–345.
    Fama, E.F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.
    _______, and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2): 301-325.
    Fisher, T., and S. Deans. 2014. New UK Auditor`s Reports Update. Citigroup Research.
    Financial Reporting Council (FRC). 2007. Discussion Paper - The Auditor’s Report: A Time for Change? London, UK.
    _______. 2012. The UK Corporate Governance Code. Revised September 2012.
    _______. 2013a. Consultation Paper - Revision to ISA (UK and Ireland) 700 Requiring the auditor’s report to address risks of material misstatement , materiality and a summary of audit scope. London, UK.
    _______. 2013b. International Standard on Auditing (UK and Ireland) 700 The independent auditor ’s report on financial statements. London, UK.
    _______. 2015. Extended Auditor’s Reports - A review of experience in the first year. London, UK.
    _______. 2016. Extended Auditor’s Reports: A Further Review of Experience. London, UK.
    Gimbar, C., B. Hansen, and M. E. Ozlanski. 2016. The effects of critical audit matter paragraphs and accounting standard precision on auditor liability. The Accounting Review 91(6): 1629-1646.
    Goodwin, J., and J.L. Seow. 2002. The influence of corporate governance mechanisms on the quality of financial reporting and auditing: Perceptions of auditors and directors in Singapore. Accounting and Finance 42(3): 195-224.
    Gul, F., and S. Leung. 2004. Board leadership, outside directors expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23: 351–379.
    Gutierrez, E., M. Minutti-Meza, K. Tatum, and M. Vulcheva. 2016. Consequences of Changing the Auditor`s Report: Evidence from the U.K. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2741174
    Hackston, D., and M.J. Milne. 1996. Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9(1): 77–108.
    Hayn, C. 1995. The information content of losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20: 125-153.
    Healy, P., and K. Palepu. 2001 Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature. Journal of Accounting & Economics 31: 405-440.
    Hoitash, U., R. Hoitash, and J. Bédard. 2009. Corporate governance and internal control over financial reporting: A comparison of regulatory regimes. Accounting Review 84(3): 839–867.
    International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2011. Consultation Paper: Enhancing the Value of Auditor Reporting: Exploring Options for Change. New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants.
    _______. 2013. A Framework for Audit Quality. Consultation Paper. (January). New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants.
    Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.
    Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (3): 375–400.
    Köhler, A.G., N. Ratzinger-Sakel, and J.C. Theis. 2016. The effects of key audit matters on the auditor`s report`s communicative value: Experimental evidence from investment professionals and non-professional investors. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2838162
    Krishnan, J. 2005. Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The accounting review 80 (2): 649-675.
    Krishnan, G., and G. Visvanathan. 2008. Does the SOX Definition of an Accounting Expert Matter? The Association between Audit Committee Directors’ Accounting Expertise and Accounting Conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research 25(3): 827-858.
    Lang, M., and R. Lundholm. 1993. Cross-Sectional Determinants of Analyst Ratings of Corporate Disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 31(2): 246-271.
    Lennox, C.S., J.J. Schmidt, and A. Thompson. 2016. Is the expanded model of audit reporting informative to investors? Evidence from the UK. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2619785 .
    Li, J., M. Mangena, and R. Pike. 2012. The Effect of Audit Committee Characteristics on Intellectual Capital Disclosure. British Accounting Review 44(2): 98-110.
    Mangena, M., and R. Pike. 2005. The effect of audit committee shareholding, financial expertise and size on interim financial disclosures. Accounting and Business Research 35(4): 327-349.
    Mock, T., J. Be´dard, P. Coram, S. Davis, R. Espahbodi, and R. Warne. 2013. The audit reporting model: Current research synthesis and implications. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32 (Supplement 1): 323–351.
    Ng, T. B.-P., and H.-T. Tan. 2003. Effects of authoritative guidance availability and audit committee effectiveness on auditors’ judgments in an auditor-client negotiation context. The Accounting Review 78 (3): 801–818.
    O’Sullivan, N. 2000. The impact of board composition and ownership on audit quality: evidence from large UK companies. British Accounting Review 32: 397-414.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2010. Standing Advisory Group Meeting - ACAP Committee’s Recommendation Relating to the Auditor`s Reporting Model. Washington, DC.
    _______. 2013a. Proposed Auditing Standards - The Auditor’s Report on an Audit of Financial Statements when the Auditor Expresses and Unqualified Opinion. Washington, DC.
    _______. 2013b. Audit Quality Indicators. Standing Advisory Group Meeting Discussion. Washington, DC: PCAOB.
    Pomeroy, B. 2010. Audit committee investigation of significant accounting decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 29(1): 173 – 205.
    _______, D.B. Thornton. 2008. Meta-analysis and the accounting literature: The case of audit committee independence and financial reporting quality. European Accounting Review 17(2): 305–330.
    Raffournier, B. 1995. The determinants of voluntary financial disclosure bySwiss listed companies. The European Accounting Review 4: 261-280.
    Rainsbury, E., M. Bradbury, and S. Cahan. 2008. Firm characteristics and audit committees complying with “best practice” membership guidelines. Accounting and Business Research 38(5): 393-408.
    Reid, L.C., J.V. Carcello, C. Li, and T.L. Neal. 2015a. Impact of Auditor and Audit Committee Report Changes on Audit Quality and Costs: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2647507
    _______, _______, _______, and_______ . 2015b. Are Auditor and Audit Committee Report Changes Useful to Investors? Evidence from the United Kingdom. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2637880
    Sirois, L.-P., J. Bédard, and P. Bera. 2014. The informational value of key audit matters in the auditor’s report: evidence from an eye-tracking study. Working Paper.
    Smith, K.W. 2016. Tell Me More: A content analysis of expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2821399 .
    Vanstraelen, A., C. Schelleman, R. Meuwissen, and I. Hofmann. 2012. The auditing reporting debate: seemingly intractable problems and feasible solutions. European Accounting Review 21(2): 193–215.
    Zaman, M., M. Hudaib, and R. Haniffa. 2011. Corporate governance quality, audit fees and non-audit services fees. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 38: 165–197.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    103353008
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103353008
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback