English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111300/142217 (78%)
Visitors : 48263824      Online Users : 148
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/104608
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104608


    Title: 大學聯招新制考生填選志願型態之研究
    Authors: 王文中
    Contributors: 林邦傑
    王文中
    Date: 1985
    Issue Date: 2016-12-06 19:03:02 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之目的有三:(一)探討考生填選志願之型態及其影響因素。(二)探討填選志願型態之效果。(三)探討填選志願型態與需求輔導之關係。
    本研究以八所大學院校,十六個學系共648位大一學生和學人補習班198位重考生為研究樣本。取得有效問卷共752份。並以田納西自我概念量表之自我批評分量表,性別角色量表,內外控量表,填選志願型態量表,以及其他自編問卷為工具。
    研究結果發現:(一)考生填選志願型態可分為三組群,即直覺組、妥協組、理智組。(二)男性特質、內控信念有助於邏輯之填選志願型態,並減低依賴之填選志願型態。(三)邏輯型、前瞻型有助於各項資料了解程度,而依賴型則會妨害。(四)邏輯型、前瞻型有助於學系滿意度。(五)邏輯型、前膽型、依賴型有助於各項資料需求程度,而盲目型則有害。(六)考生認為系統決策方法之輔導措施對其填選志願幫助頗大。直覺組認為輔導他去想像自己到底喜歡什麼樣的學系和職業對其填選志願助益最大。
    並根據研究發現提出建議:(一)提供考生有關填選志願之充份資料。(二)加強男性正向特質、內控信念。(三)培養學生系統決策能力。(四)了解學生決策型態。(五)針對不同決策型態給予適當的輔導措施。
    第一章 緒論1
    第一節 研究動機與目的1
    第二節 重要名詞詮釋8
    第三節 研究問題與假設10
    第二章 文獻探討13
    第一節 決策型態之理論13
    第二節 決策型態之影響因素28
    第三節 決策型態之效果33
    第四節 決策型態與輔導方式38
    第三章 研究方法45
    第一節 研究樣本45
    第二節 研究工具47
    第三節 資料處理61
    第四章 研究結果與討論63
    第一節 考生填選志願之型態63
    第二節 填選志願有關資料了解程度85
    第三節 學系滿意度101
    第四節 填選志願有關資料需求程度115
    第五節 填選志願輔導措施助益程度127
    第五章 結論與建議143
    第一節 結論143
    第二節 研究限制與建議146
    參考書目151
    附錄1 ~ 9
    圖表目錄
    圖錄
    圖 4 ~ 1 集群分析合併距離上升趨勢圖64
    圖 4 ~ 2 三集群之組間距離圖66
    表錄
    表 3 ~ 1 受試人數分配及問卷回收率表46
    表 3 ~ 2 基本資料次數分配表47
    表 3 ~ 3 填選志願型態之因素分析摘要表51
    表 3 ~ 4 填選志願有關資料了解程度之因素分析摘要表53
    表 3 ~ 5 填選志願有關資料需求程度之因素分析摘要表55
    表 3 ~ 6 填選志願輔導措施助益程度之因素分析摘要表59
    表 3 ~ 7 學系滿意度之因素分析摘要表60
    表 4 ~ 1 集群分析倒數六次合併距離摘要表73
    表 4 ~ 2 集群平均數、標準差與變異數分析F值摘要表74
    表 4 ~ 3 各基本資料組在填選志願型態之平均數、標準差75
    表 4 ~ 4 各基本資料組在性別角色、內外控,填選志願有關資料了解程度,學系滿意度,填選志願有關資料需求程度,輔導措施助益程度之平均數、標準差77
    表 4 ~ 5 性別在填選志願型態之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表79
    表 4 ~ 6 性別在填選志願型態之區別函數平均數79
    表 4 ~ 7 高中就讀組別在填選志願型態之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表80
    表 4 ~ 8 高中就讀組別在填選志願型態之區別函數平均數80
    表 4 ~ 9 性別在性別角色、內外控之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表81
    表 4 ~ 10 性別在性別角色、內外控之區別函數平均數81
    表 4 ~ 11 高中就讀組別在性別角色、內外控之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表82
    表 4 ~ 12 高中就讀組別在性別角色、內外控之區別函數平均數82
    表 4 ~ 13 校別在性別角色、內外控之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表83
    表 4 ~ 14 校別在性別角色、內外控之區別函數平均數83
    表 4 ~ 15 性別角色、內外控與填選志願型態之典型相關摘要表84
    表 4 ~ 16 考生在填選志願有關資料了解程度之平均數、標準差90
    表 4 ~ 17 填選志願有關資料了解程度之平均數差異量及t考驗摘要表90
    表 4 ~ 18 考生在填選志願有關資料了解程度、需求程度、學系滿意度(逐題)之平均數、標準差91
    表 4 ~ 19 性別在填選志願有關資料了解程度之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表93
    表 4 ~ 20 性別在填選志願有關資料了解程度之區別函數平均數93
    表 4 ~ 21 高中就讀組別在填選志願有關資料了解程度之區別分析及單變項變異數分析 F值摘要表94
    表 4 ~ 22 高中就讀組別在填選志願有關資料了解程度之區別函數平均數94
    表 4 ~ 23 校別在填選志願有關資料了解程度之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表95
    表 4 ~ 24 校別在填選志願有關資料了解程度之區別函數平均數95
    表 4 ~ 25 性別角色、內外控與填選志願有關資料了解程度之典型相關摘要表97
    表 4 ~ 26 填選志願型態與填選志願有關資料了解程度之典型相關摘要表99
    表 4 ~ 27 考生在學系滿意度之平均數、標準差106
    表 4 ~ 28 學系滿意度之平均數差異量及t考驗摘要表106
    表 4 ~ 29 性別在學系滿意度之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表107
    表 4 ~ 30 性別在學系滿意度之區別函數平均數107
    表 4 ~ 31 高中就讀組別在學系滿意度之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表108
    表 4 ~ 32 高中就讀組別在學系滿意度之區別函數平均數108
    表 4 ~ 33 校別在學系滿意度之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表109
    表 4 ~ 34 校別在學系滿意度之區別函數平均數109
    表 4 ~ 35 性別角色、內外控與學系滿意度之典型相關摘要表111
    表 4 ~ 36 填選志願型態與學系滿意度之典型相關摘要表113
    表 4 ~ 37 考生在填選志願有關資料需求程度之平均數、標準差119
    表 4 ~ 38 填選志願有關資料需求程度之平均數差異量及t考驗摘要表119
    表 4 ~ 39 性別在填選志願有關資料需求程度之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表120
    表 4 ~ 40 性別在填選志願有關資料需求程度之區別函數平均數120
    表 4 ~ 41 高中就讀組別在填選志願有關資料需求程度之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表121
    表 4 ~ 42 高中就讀組別在填選志願有關資料需求程度之區別函數平均數122
    表 4 ~ 43 校別在填選志願有關資料需求程度之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表122
    表 4 ~ 44 校別在填選志願有關資料需求程度之區別函數平均數122
    表 4 ~ 45 性別角色、內外控與填選志願有關資料需求程度之典型相關摘要表123
    表 4 ~ 46 填選志願型態與填選志願有關資料需求程度之典型相關摘要表125
    表 4 ~ 47 各填選志願型態組群在填選志願輔導措施助益程度之平均數、標準差135
    表 4 ~ 48 填選志願輔導措施助益程度之平均數差異量及t考驗摘要表135
    表 4 ~ 49 各填選志願型態組群在填選志願輔導措施助益程益(逐題)之平均數、標準差、順序等級135
    表 4 ~ 50 性別在填選志願輔導措施助益程度之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表137
    表 4 ~ 51 性別在填選志願輔導措施助益程度之區別函數平均數137
    表 4 ~ 52 高中就讀組別在填選志願輔導措施助益程度之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表138
    表 4 ~ 53 高中就讀組別在填選志願輔導措施助益程度之區別函數平均數138
    表 4 ~ 54 校別在填選志願輔導措施助益程度之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表139
    表 4 ~ 55 校別在填選志願輔導措施助益程度之區別函數平均數139
    表 4 ~ 56 性別角色、內外控與填選志願輔導措施助益程度之典型相關摘要表142
    表 4 ~ 57 各填選志願型態組群在填選志願輔導措施助益程度之區別分析及單變項變異數分析F值摘要表140
    表 4 ~ 58 各填選志願型態組群在填選志願輔導措施助益程度之區別函數平均數140
    Reference: 一、中文部份
    林邦傑:田納西自我概念量表指導手冊。正昂教育科學社,民69.。
    林幸台:我國大學生決策型態與職業決策行為之研究。輔導學報,民73.,第7期,41.~66.頁。
    吳正勝:大一學生對高中時期接受教育輔導功能之評量研究。輔導學報,民67.,第1期,123~218頁。
    吳正勝:高級中學輔導工作之研究。輔導學校,民68.,第2期,124~154頁。
    李本華、楊淑貞:大專聯考錄取生就讀科系與個人志趣符合程度的研究,中華心理學刊,民64.,第17.期,125~144頁。
    李美枝:性別特質問卷的編製及男女大學生四種性別特質類型在成就動機、婚姻、事業及性態度上的比較。中華心理學刊,民70.年,23.卷1期,23.~37.頁。
    翁淑緣、呂勝瑛:大學乙丁組學生對就讀科系的興趣及畢業後計劃的調查研究。轉引自劉兆明:我國大學科系興趣量表的編製及效度研究。政大教育研究所碩士論文,民71.。
    教育部:大學入學考試制度之改進,民72.。
    黃淑貞:本校新生應考聯招時科系選擇的研究。國立台灣大學理學院心理系研究報告,民60.,第13.期,196~204頁。
    經合會:前程設計,台北:延平書局,民59.。
    楊國樞、李本華:五百五十七個中文人格特質形容詞之好惡度,意義度及熟悉度。國立台灣大學心理系研究報告,民60,第13.期,36.~57.頁。
    蔡保田:五十八學年度全國大專聯招考取青年狀況暨去向調查報告。行政院青年輔導委員會,民59.。
    蔡淑娥:高中生的電腦態度、電腦成就及其相關因素之研究。政大教育研究所碩士論文,民74.。
    鄭熙彥:我國高級中學學生升學問題與輔導。師大教育研究所碩士論文,民62.。
    謝高橋:我國大專聯招填寫志願問題的研究。社會建設季刊,民60.,第9號,21.~40.。
    導航文教基金會:讓我們一起來為青少年前程努力,民72。
    導航文教基金會:大學聯招新制第一代考生感想調查報告。民73.。
    二、西文部分:
    Allen, H. personal communication to Roberta Piper; 1978.
    Arroba, T. Styles of decision-making and their use : An empirical study. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 1977, 5(2), 149-158.
    Barrect, T. C., & Tinsley, H. E. A. Vocational self-concept crystallization and Vocational indecisim. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1977, 24, 301-307.
    Berger-Gross, V., Kahn, M. W., & Weare, C. R The role of Anxiety in the career decision making of liberal arts students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1983, 22, 312-323.
    Bowd, A.D. Retest reliability of the children`s Embeded Figures Test for young children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1974,39,442.
    Bowd, A. D. Absence of sex differences on the children`s Embedded Figures Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1976, 43,729-730.
    Chickering, A. W. Education and identity. San Francisca: Jossey-Bass, 1969.
    Cordon, V. Personal communication, 1981.
    Coscarelli, W. C. & Stonewater, J. K. Understanding psychological styles in instructional development consulation. Journal of Instructional Development, 1980, 3(2), 16-22.
    Coscarelli, W. C. Development of a decision-making inventory to assess Johnson`s decision-making styles. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1983, 16(3), 149-160.
    Constantinople, A. Analytical ability and perceived similarity to parents. Psychological Reports, 1974, 35, 1335-1345.
    Crites, J. U. Development of career attitudes in adolescence : Longitudial trends, 1975, In R. J. Noeth & D. J. Prediger, Career development over the high school years. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 1978, 26(3), 244-254.
    De Russy, E. A., & Futch, E. Field depend ence-independence as related to college curricula. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1971, 33, 1235-1237.
    Dilley, J. S. Decision making ability and vocational maturity. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1965, 44, 423-437.
    Dinklage, L. D. Student decision-making studies of adolescents in the secondary schools. Report No. 6. Cambridge. Mass : Harvard Graduate School of Education, 1969.
    Egner, J. R., & Jackson, D.T. Effectiveness of a counseling intervention program For teaching career decision making skills. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1978, 25, 45-52.
    Eisner D. A. & Williams, E. J. Assessment of perseptual field independence in freshman and senior undergraduates. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973, 37, 794-796.
    Fretz, B. R. Evaluating the effectivence of career interventions. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1981, 28, 77-90.
    Giammatteo, R.R. Work values clarification, degree of vocational maturity and cogruency between one`s self-concept and stereotype of one`s probable occupational choice. Dessertation Abstracts International, 1980, 41(2), 536A.
    Ginzberg, E., Ginsberg, S. W., Axelrad, S., &. Herma, J. L. Occupational Choice: An-approach to general theory. New York : Columbia Univ. Press, 1951.
    Gozali, H. et al. Relationship between the internal-external control construst and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1973, 649-14.
    Harren, V. A., Kass, R. A., Tinsley, H.E., & Moreland, J. R. Influence of sex role attitudes and cognitive styles on career decision-making. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1978, 25, 390-398.
    Harren, V. A. A model of career decision making for college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior,1979, 14, 119-133.
    Harren, V. A. & Biscardi, D. L, Sex roles and cognitive styles as predictors of Holland typologies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1980, 17(2), 231-241.
    Hesketh, B. Decision-making style and career decision-making behavior among school leavers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1982, 20, 223-234.
    Holland, J. L. The Self-Directed Search. Palo Alto, Calif : Consulting Psychologist Press, 1970.
    Holtzman, W. H., Swartz, J. D. & Thorpe, J. S. Artists, architects, and engineers... three contrasting modes of visual experience and their psychological correlates Journal of Personality, 1971, 39, 432- 439.
    Hunt, D. E., Sullivan, E. V. Between psychology and education. Hinsdale, Ill: Dryden Press, 1974.
    Jepsen, D. A. Vocational decision-making patterns among noncollege-aspiring adolescents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1974, 4, 284-293. (a).
    Jepsen, D. A. Vocational decision-making strategy-types : An exploratory study. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 1974, 23, 1. 17-23(b).
    Joe, V. C. Review of the internal-external control construct as a personnality variable. Psychological Reports, 1971, 28, 619-640.
    Johnson, H. Individual styles of decision making : A theoretical model for counseling. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1978, 56, 530-536.
    Keller, K. E., Biggs, D. A., & Gysbers, N.C. Career counseling from a cognitive perspective. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1982, 60, 367-371.
    Kogan, N. Educational implications of cognitive style. In G. S. Lesser (Ed.), Psychology and educational practice. Glenview, Illnois : Scott & Foresman, 1971.
    Kogan, N. Creativity and cogntive style : A life span perspective. In P. Baltes & K. W. Schair (EDs.), Life span developmental psychology. Personality and socialization. New York : Academic press, 1973.
    Krumboltz, J. (Ed.). Revolution in counseling. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1966.
    Krumboltz, J.D. The effect of alternative career decision making strategies on the quality of resulting decisions. Final report. Standford, CA: Standford Univ, 1979.
    Laskin, S. B. The effects of a decision-making program on the career maturity of high school students. Dessertation Abstracts International, 1980, 40(8) ,4413A.
    Lunneborg, P. W. Sex and career decision-making styles. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1978, 25, 299-305.
    Massari, D. J. The relation of reflection-impulsivity to feld dependence-independence of internal-external control, in children, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1975, 126, 61-67.
    Mc Caffrey, S. S. A study of career maturity-in graduate and underguadute students. Dessertation Abstracts International, 1980, 40(7), 3784A.
    Mc Dowell, S.L. Verification of the career maturity inventory attitude scale for use with Oregon twelfth students. Dessertation Abstracts International, 1978, 39(6), 3534-5A.
    Melhus, G. E., Hershenson, D. W., & Vermillion, M. E. Computer assisted versus traditional counseling with high and low readiness clients. Journal of vocational Behavior, 1973, 3, 137-144.
    Miller, A. L., & Tiedeman, D. V. Decision-making for the 70`s The cabing of the Tiedeman paradigm and its application in career education. Focus on Guidance, 1972, 5, 1-15.
    Moreland, J. R., Harren V.A., Krimsky-Montague, E., & Tinsley, H. E. A, Sex role self-concept and career decision making. Journal of counselig Psychology, 1979, 26, 329-336.
    Moreland, J. R., Gulanick, N., Montague, E. K., & Hrren, V. A. Some psychometric properties of the Bem Sex- Role Inventory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978, 2, 247-256.
    Moore, B. L. Career decision making skills of college freshman as measured by certainty about career choice, career maturity, and vocational interest in maturity. Dessertation Abstracts International, 1980, 40(9), 4900A.
    Nunally, J. C. Psychometric Theory, NEW York : Mc Graw-Hill, 1967.
    Opsiow, S. H., Ashby, J. D., & Wall, H. W. Personality types and career choice : A test of Holland`s theory. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1966, 45, 37-42.
    Osipow, S. H. Theories of career development. N.Y. Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1968.
    Osipow, S. H. Cognitive styles and educational-volcational preferences and selection, Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1969, 16(6) 534-546.
    Parsons, F Choosing a vocation. Boston : Houghton Mifflin, 1909.
    Phillips, S. D., & Strohmer, D. C. Decision-making styles and vocational maturity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1982, 20, 215-222.
    Phillips, S. D. & Strohmer, D. C. Vocationally mature coping strategies and progress in the decision-making process : A canonical analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1983, 395-402.
    Phillips, S. D., Pazinza, N. T., & Walsh, D. J. Decision making seyles and progress in occupational decision making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1984, 25. 96-105.
    Piper, R. A comparative, factor-analytic study of the Jungian Type Survey and Johson`s Decision Making Inventory. Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. 1978.
    Posthuma, A. B., & Carr, T. E. Differentiation matching in therapy. Canadian Psychological Review, 1975 16, 35-43.
    Power, P. G., Holland, J. L, Daiger, D. C., & Takai, R. T. The relation of student characteristics to the influence of the SDS. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1979, 12, 98-107.
    Prediger, D. J. Career decision-making measures in the context of Harren`s model. In D. Prediger (Chair), Is career decision-making career maturity ? Symposium pressented at the meeting of American Personnel and Guidance Association, Las Vegas, Nevada, 1979.
    Putnam, B. A., Hosie, T. W. & Hansen, J. C. Sex differences in self-concept variables and vocational attitude maturity of adolescents. Journal of Experimental Education, 1978, Fall, 23-27.
    Rotter, J. R. Generalizd expectances of internal verus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Mongoraphs : General and Applied, 1966, 80, No. 1.
    Rubinton, N. Instruction in career decision making and decision-making styles. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1980, 27(6) 581-588.
    Samuel, J. Effects of traditional instruction treatment verus biofeedback training on decision making style and locus of control. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1981, 42, 1610, B.
    Schenk, G. E., Johnston, J. A., & Jacobsen, K. The influence of a career group experience on the vocational maturity of college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1979, 14, 284-296.
    Schutz, R. A., & Blocher, D. H. Self-satisfaction and level of occupational choice. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1961, 40, 595-598.
    Stockin, B. S. A test of Holoand`s occupational level formulations. Personnel and Guidance Journal 1964, 42, 599-602.
    Super, D. E. (Ed). Measuring Vocational maturity for counseling and evalution. Washington, D. C : American Personnel and Guidance Association, 1974.
    Takai, R. T., & Holland, J. L. Comparison of the Vocational Card Sort, the SDS, and the Vocational Exploration and Insight Kit. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 1979, 27, 312-319.
    Tideman, D. V. Decision and vocational development : A paradigm and its implications. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1961, 40, 15-21.
    Tideman, D. V. & O`Hara, R. P. Career development : choice and adjustment. New York : College Enterance Examination Board , 1963.
    Tracy, K. Schmeck, R. R., & Spofford. M. Determiners of Vocational interest : sex, spatial-verbal abilities, and information processing styles. Paper presented at the meetings of the Midwestern Psychological Association in St. Louis, MO., May 3, 1980.
    Wales, C. E., & Stager, A. The guided design approach Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Educational Technology Pubications, 1978.
    Wall, H. W., Osipow, S. H., & Ashby, J.D. SVIB scores, occupational choice and Holland`s personality types. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 1967, 15, 201-205.
    Witkin, H. A. et al. Role of field-dependent and field- independent congnitive styles in academic evolution: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1977, 69, 107-121.
    Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Researoh, 1977, 47, 1-64.
    York, D. Gender and cognitive styles as predictors of Holland`s typology. Dissertation, Southern Illinois Univ. at Carbondale, 1982.
    Relation: 國立政治大學
    教育研究所
    碩士
    73
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2370View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback