Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104446
|
| Title: | 東日本大震災と日本の再興 東日本大地震與日本再興 |
| Other Titles: | 東日本大地震與日本再興（The Great East Japan Earthquake and Japan`s Reconstruction） |
| Authors: | 東郷和彦 |
| Keywords: | 東日本大地震;日本列島改造論;田園都市構想;景觀;富國有德;The Great East Japan Earthquake;Reconstructing the Japanese Archipelago;Garden City Concept;Scenery;Rich Country Virtuous Country |
| Date: | 2012-03 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-12-02 16:52:58 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 3・11 は言語に絶する被害をもたらしたが、破壊が徹底している分、新しい日本再興の夢を多くの人がもった。日本は昭和の時代まで、戦争により徹底的に破壊された国土を再興し「富国平和」により経済大国を実現したが、その後平成の20 年間、国家目標を失い、新しい課題に効果的に対応できず、低迷を続けた。低迷の原因の一つは、田中角栄の列島改造論・中央集権・公共事業型の政治姿勢を乗り越えることができず、大平正芳の田園都市国家構想に端を発し、橋本龍太郎・小渕恵三・中川秀直・川勝平太につらなる、自然・農村・伝統・文化・地方・景観・人間を重視する「 富国有徳」の国土造りへの転換が、国家目標として実現できなかったことにある。3・11 は、東北三県に、大平－小渕－川勝型の21 世紀の理想郷建設の希望をいだかせたが、震災一年にして、復興の過程の遅れ、国民の自己中心主義を始めとする様々な問題が浮き上がっている。3・11 のあと世界を驚かせた日本人の持つ力によって、日本の新しい国家目標に至る大転換が実現できるか、今後を見守りたい。 三一一帶來了無法用言語形容的傷害，因為破壞之徹底，很多人燃起復興新日本的夢想。日本到昭和時期為止，復興了因戰爭而徹底破壞的國土，基於「富國和平」的理念實現了經濟大國。之後，在平成的二十年裡，失去了國家目標，新的課題無法有效地對應問題，造成了持續的低迷。低迷的原因之一是，無法超越田中角榮的列島改造論‧中央集權‧公共事業型的政治主張，無法順利轉向為以大平正芳的田園都市國家構想為發端，橋本龍太郎‧小淵惠三‧中川秀直‧川勝平太等提出的重視自然‧農村‧傳統‧文化‧地方‧景觀‧人的「富國有德」的國土再造計畫，此計畫作為國家目標無法得以實現。三一一使東北三縣懷抱了太平—小淵—川勝型建設二十一世紀理想鄉的希望，但震災後已過一年，出現了如復興過程的緩慢、國民的自我中心主義等種種問題。筆者希望能持續關注的，三一一之後，日本是否能以其震驚世界的力量，實現新國家目標的大轉型。March 11 brought about immeasurable disaster, but as the destruction was so overwhelming, many people thought that it might become an opportunity for the reconstruction of a new Japan. Japan achieved the status of economic giant through the construction of a `rich and peaceful country` after its total destruction by WWII, but it lost its national objective in the era of Heisei and drifted for 20 years, unable to cope with rising new problems. One of the reasons for this adrift was that Japan could not overcome the shortcomings of Tanaka Kakuei`s theory of `Reconstruction of Japanese Archipelago` with its strong bent to central government, developing Japan through public investment. Another direction emerged led by Ohira Masayoshi with his `Garden City Concept`, inherited by Hashimoto Ryutaro, Obuchi Keizo, Nakagawa Hidenao and Kawakatsu Heita. They all emphasized such factors as nature, countryside, tradition, culture, region, scenery, and human beings but failed to make them as Japan`s national objective. March 11 gave some hope to create a dreamland of the 21st century civilization in the three Tohoku prefectures based on Ohira-Obuchi- Kawakatsu type of vision, but in one year`s time after the disaster, many problems emerged such as delay in reconstruction work or egocentric behaviors of the population. It is not clear whether Japan would achieve any fundamental change in establishing a new national objective based on its inherent people`s power which astonished the world after March 11.
March 11 brought about immeasurable disaster, but as the destruction was so overwhelming, many people thought that it might become an opportunity for the reconstruction of a new Japan. Japan achieved the status of economic giant through the construction of a `rich and peaceful country` after its total destruction by WWII, but it lost its national objective in the era of Heisei and drifted for 20 years, unable to cope with rising new problems. One of the reasons for this adrift was that Japan could not overcome the shortcomings of Tanaka Kakuei`s theory of `Reconstruction of Japanese Archipelago` with its strong bent to central government, developing Japan through public investment. Another direction emerged led by Ohira Masayoshi with his `Garden City Concept`, inherited by Hashimoto Ryutaro, Obuchi Keizo, Nakagawa Hidenao and Kawakatsu Heita. They all emphasized such factors as nature, countryside, tradition, culture, region, scenery, and human beings but failed to make them as Japan`s national objective. March 11 gave some hope to create a dreamland of the 21st century civilization in the three Tohoku prefectures based on Ohira-Obuchi- Kawakatsu type of vision, but in one year`s time after the disaster, many problems emerged such as delay in reconstruction work or egocentric behaviors of the population. It is not clear whether Japan would achieve any fundamental change in establishing a new national objective based on its inherent people`s power which astonished the world after March 11. |
| Relation: | 問題と研究,41(1),1-30 |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [問題と研究] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 41-1-1.pdf | | 671Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 117 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
