English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51579958      Online Users : 758
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > Issues & Studies > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/104126
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104126


    Title: US-China Relations under Bush and Obama: Fill in the Blanks or It`s the Structure, Stupid?
    Authors: Blanchard, Jean-Marc F.
    Keywords: Bush;Obama;China;neoclassical realism;United States
    Date: 2013-09
    Issue Date: 2016-11-21 16:54:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: There are numerous studies of Sino-American relations during George W. Bush`s tenure in office, but not many investigating it over the course of Barack Obama`s stint in the White House. While there are quite a few comparisons of Bush Jr. and Obama`s personalities, policies, and accomplishments, there are no systematic comparisons of their China policies. This article aims to rectify these deficiencies by providing detailed information about Obama`s policies towards China and a comparison of the two presidents` China policies. It undertakes this comparison across five political, economic, and social issue areas. The first is Bush Jr. and Obama`s respective stances towards the Taiwan issue. The second is their dealings with China in regard to security problems. The third is the policies of the two US presidents with respect to economic issues. The fourth is their human rights policies. The fifth is their China doctrines. This study concludes there is little to set apart the China policies of Bush Jr. and Obama despite these individual`s many other differences. There are periods such as the two presidents` first years in office where China policy differences were stark, but on the whole the similarities between their policies are greater than the differences.
    Relation: Issues & Studies,49(3),35-72
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Issues & Studies] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    49(3)-35-72.pdf426KbAdobe PDF2412View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback