English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50800073      Online Users : 815
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > Issues & Studies > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/104049


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104049


    Title: When is China`s Military Modernization Dangerous? Constructing the Cross-Strait Offense-Defense Balance and U.S. Arms Sales to Taiwan
    Authors: 陳慶昌
    Chen, Ching-Chang
    Keywords: offense-defense balance;threat perception;U.S. arms sales;Taiwan;constructivism
    Date: 2009-09
    Issue Date: 2016-11-18 11:15:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: This paper at tempts to understand how and why China has been portrayed as the primary military threat in Taiwanese security discourse through an examination of offense-defense theory. It is based on the premise that those events or factors that one identifies as dangerous come to be defined as such only through an interpretation of their various dimensions of dangerousness. The paper first introduces the protracted debate among the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, the ”pan-Blue” opposition parties, and U.S. officials and analysts over the 2004 special defense budget controversy. In defense of its arms procurement program, the Chen Shui-bian administration resorted to a particular mode of interpreting danger; that is, it considered that the military balance across the Taiwan Strait had been shifting in China`s favor and thus it was imperative to address the imbalance through de1rying the weapons systems provided by Washington. The paper then explores the underlying assumption of that pervasive interpretation in the official articulation of Chinese military threat in Taiwan and the United States, which holds that offensive advantages make sear more likely-a principal hypothesis of offense-defense theory. Rather than questioning the methodological ambiguities around the definition and measurement of the ”offense-defense balance”, the paper argues that it is precisely these ambiguities that make China`s threat image in Taiwan possible. The special budget case indicates how Taiwan`s policy is better understood as a political practice central to the constitution, production, and maintenance of a peace-loving Taiwanese identity, contrary to the belligerent Chinese, than as an instrument to build and maintain a capable defense posture against potential attacks from the mainland.
    Relation: Issues & Studies,45(3),69-119
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Issues & Studies] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2672View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback