政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/103602
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51273325      線上人數 : 801
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/103602


    題名: 論科學解釋 : 一個三民主義研究的基礎
    作者: 杜奉賢
    貢獻者: 胡訓正
    杜奉賢
    日期: 1985
    上傳時間: 2016-11-09 15:58:37 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 論文提要
    在三民主義研究的範疇中，最迫切需要的，當是建立作為後設基礎的方法論；而在方法論的爭辯中，「科學解釋」又是最富挑戰性的題目；因為它是研究過程與知識建立之間的橋樑，故而論證的鋪陳必須兼顧到本體論、知識論、方法論、經驗論與唯理論，美國的新實證論與歐洲的詮釋學等。從這些爭辯中，筆者層層撥開對社會科學與解釋的曲解，建立社會科學方法論的自我風貌。最後再從解釋的脈絡中尋找社會科學與三民主義的關連而建立三民主義研究的方法論基礎。全文分為六章，現將要點略述如后：
    第壹章導論。說明本文的基本預設，就是把三民主義研究視同於社會科學研究；再設定全文的理論觀點，概念格局與分析架構。
    第貳章經驗科學中的解擇型式及其問題。評析邏輯實證論者和實證社會科學家所倡導的含蓋定律解擇型式，包括 “D－N ”型式，“ I－S ”型式，以及修正與補充的” S－R ”型式，“ D－N－P ” 型式和“ CC ”解釋等；此乃邏輯的解釋。
    第參章科學解釋在社會科學方法論中的爭議。論述實證論者的後設觀點，與反對引用自然科學中的解釋型式，而認為社會科學中應有其獨特詮釋理解法的人文研究者觀點。從雙方觀點中找出互補論題，即意義與因果的兼顧與研究過程的整合，並建立理解的解釋觀。
    第肆章社會科學研究中解釋的疑難。探討在後設理論中，我們根本不能解釋而只能描述，在實際研究中，所謂解釋也只是描述的論辯，從論辯中建立描述的解釋，並且認為這種解釋型態正可調和前述邏輯與理解兩種對立的解釋觀點，而且在實際解釋的應用上有其可行性。
    第伍章社會科學中的解釋方法。此乃針對社會科學家在實際的研究上如何進行解釋作探討。先對社會現象做若干假定，然後區分出四種解釋方法，即溯源、功能、行動、總體等。在解釋過程中要交互運用邏輯的，詮釋理解的與描述的解釋，但這些解釋都必須面對人類主體的動機、意圖、目的等特性，而建立動機的解釋。
    第陸章結論：科學解釋與三民主義研究。由解釋的預設中導出社會科學理論的多元典範和走向規範性道德理論的需求；而三民主義亦是求實用的規範性理論，因而主張社會科學與三民主義的交互透視。
    第壹章 導論1
    第一節 研究背景 1
    第二節 解釋與社會科學研究7
    第三節 分析架構17
    第貳章 經驗科學中的解釋型式及其問題24
    第一節 含蓋定律解釋型式26
    第二節 含蓋定律解釋型式的內在困難35
    第三節 對含蓋定律解釋型式的修正與補充44
    第參章 科學解釋在社會科學方法論中的爭論56
    第一節 實證研究的主張58
    第二節 人文研究的主張71
    第三節 科學解釋在社會科學中的特性86
    第肆章 社會科學研究中解釋的疑難99
    第一節 解釋超越描述的觀點100
    第二節 以描述作為解釋的觀點106
    第三節 解釋與描述的關連114
    第伍章 社會科學中的解釋方法124
    第一節 社會現象與解釋方法125
    第二節 解釋方法之類別131
    第陸章 結論：科學解釋與三民主義研究149
    第一節 社會科學解釋與規範性理論150
    第二節 一個三民主義研究的基礎155
    參考資料161
    參考文獻: 甲、中文部分
    國父全集，七十，第一、二冊，台北：中國國民黨中央委員公黨史委員會。
    先總統蔣公全集，七三，第一冊，張其昀主編，台北：文化大學。
    石元康，七二：「實證論與歷史說明」，刊於史學評論第六期，七二，台北：華世出版社，頁81 - 109。
    李亦園、楊國樞、文崇一等編著，七四：現代化與中國化論集，台北：桂冠圖書公司。
    杜奉賢，七二：「辯明歸納論的或然率論證」，刊於研究生，第廿六期，台北：政治大學研究生學會，頁31 - 37。
    余英時，七三年六月十三～十五日：「哈伯瑪斯“批判理論”與意識型態」，刊於中國時報第八版。
    呂亞力，六八：政治學方法論，台北：三民書局。
    易君博，六四：「社會科學中的歷史解釋」，刊於易君博，政治學論文集--理論與方法，台北：台灣省教育會，頁169 - 199。
    金耀基，七一：「社會學的中國化：一個社會學的知識論的問題」，刊於楊國樞、文崇一主編，七一：91 - 11。
    洪鎌德，六六：「科學說明及其應用」，刊於洪鎌德，思想及方法，台北，牧童出版社，頁147 - 162。
    高承恕，七一：「社會科學中國化之可能性及其意義」，刊於楊國樞等編，七一： 31 - 50。
    馬起華，六五： 「如何使三民主義學術化」，刊於東方雜誌，復刊第十卷第一期，頁21 - 24。
    袁頌西，七十：「當代政治學中的解釋問題：實證論與詮釋派之論爭」，刊於政治學報第九期，台北：中國政治學會，頁53 - 105。
    崔書琴，三四：三民主義新論，七二年台北十五版，台北：商務印書館。
    陳寬政，七一：「社會學理論與研究的形式關係」，刊於瞿海源、蕭新煌主編：社會學理論與方法，台北：中研院民族所，專刊乙種第十一號，
    頁173 - 198。
    黃進興，六九：「歷史解釋和通則的關係：韓培爾觀點之檢討」，刊方李弘祺等著：史學方法論集，台北：食貨出版社，頁393 - 416。
    楊國樞、文崇一主編，七一：社會及行為科學研究的中國化，台北：中央研究院民族學研究所。
    乙、英文部分
    Abel Theodore, 1953: “The Operation Called Verstehen” in H. Feigl & M. Brodbeck, (ed.) 1953: Readings in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts, Inc., pp. 677-687.
    Alexander, Jeffrey C., 1982: Theoretical Logic in Sociology, Vol. One, Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
    Apel, K.O., 1977: “Types of Social Science in the Light of Human Interests of Knowledge” in Social Research, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 425-470.
    Aron, Raymond, 1967: Main Currents in Sociological Thought, New York: Basic Books, Vol. II. pp. 179-204. (黃瑞祺，六九：韋伯的社會科學方法論，刊於思與言，18卷4期，頁328-343)
    Ayer, Alfred J., 1967: “Man as a Subject for Social Science.” in Peter Laslett and Walter G. Runciman (eds.) 1967: Philosophy, Politics and Society, 2nd ser., Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Bernstein, Richard J., 1976: The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory, New York: Harcourt.
    Bernstein, Richard J., 1983: Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Bernstein, Robert A., and James A. Dyer, 1979: An Introduction to Political Science Methods, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Black, J.A., and Champion, D.J., 1976: Methods and Issues in Social Research, New York: Wiley.
    Bottomore, T., 1975: “Competing Paradigms in Macrosociology.” in A. Inkles, J Coleman and N. Smelser, (eds.), Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 1. Palo Calif: Annual Review Inc. pp. 223-246.
    Braithwaite, Richard B, 1953: Scientific Explanation-A Study of the Function of Theory, Probability and Law in Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (First ed. 1968.)
    Brodbeck, May, 1968： “Explanation, Prediction and ‘Imperfect’ Knowledge”, in Brodbeck, M.(ed.) (1968), pp. 363-398.
    Brodbeck, May, (ed.) 1968: Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.
    Brody, B.A., (ed), 1970: Readings in the Philosophy of Science, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Bromberger, S., 1966: “Why Questions” in Colodny, R., (ed.) 1966: Mind and Cosmos, Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 86-111.
    Brown, R., 1963: Explanation in Social Science, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
    Cohen, H., 1973: “Das Verstehen and Historical Knowledge.” in American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 10, pp. 299-307.
    Collingwood, Robin G., 1946: The Idea of History, London: Oxford University Press.
    Cowing, Maurice, 1963: The Nature and Limits of Political Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Dilworth, Craig, 1981: Scientific Progress, Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
    Downes, Chauncey, 1976: “Functional Explanations and Intentions.” in Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Vol. 6, pp. 215-225.
    Dray, W., 1957: Laws and Explanation in History, London: Oxford University Press.
    Dretske, Fred I., 1977: “Laws of Nature” in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 44, pp. 248-268.
    Duverger, Maurice, 1963: Political Parties, New York: Science Editions.
    Farr, James, 1983: “Popper`s Hermeneutics” in Philosophy of the Social Sciences Vol. 13, pp. 157-176.
    Fay, Brian, 1975: “Positivist Social Science and Technological Politics” in Potter, D.,(ed.) (1981) . pp. 425-434.
    Feigl, Herbert, 1948: “Some Remarks on the Meaning of Scientific Explanation”, in Feigl, Hebert, & Wilfrid Sellars, 1949: Readings in Philosophical Analysis, New York: Appleton- Century-Crafts, Inc., pp. 510-514.
    Feigl, Herbert, & Wilfrid Sellars, Keith Lehrer, (ed.) 1972: New Readings in Philosophical Analysis, New York: Meredith Corporation.
    Feigl, H., & G. Maxwell,(eds.), 1962: Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Filmer, P., M. Phillipson, D. Silverman, D. Walsh, 1972: New Directions in Sociology Theory, Cambridge: The Mit Press.
    Gärdenfors, Peter, 1976: “Relevance and Redundancy in Deductive Explanations” in Philosophy of Science. Vol. 43, pp. 420-431.
    Gärdenfors, Peter, 1980: “A Pragmatic Approach to Explanations.” in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 47, pp. 403-423.
    Gellner, Ernest, 1973: Cause and Meaning in the Social Science, London and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Gibson, Quentin, 1960: The Logic of Social Enquiry, London; Routledge.
    Giddens, Anthony, 1976: New Rules of Sociological Method, New York: Basic Books, Inc.
    Graham, G.J., 1971: Methodological Foundations for Political Analysis, Toronto: Jr. Xerox College Publishing.
    Greer, Scott, 1969: The Logic of Social Inquiry, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
    Gregor, A. James, 1971: An Introduction to Metapolitics-A Brief Inquiry into the Conceptual Language of Political Science, New York: The Free Press.
    Gruner, R., 1969: “The Notion of Understanding: Relplies to Cunningham and Van Evra” in Inquiry, Vol. 12, pp. 349-56.
    Habermas, Jürgen, 1970: Knowledge and Human Interests, Boston: Beacon Press.
    Halfpenny, Peter, 1982: Positivism and Sociology, London: George Allen & Unwin.
    Handy, Rollo, & E. L Harwood, (ed.) 1973: Modern Scientific inquiry-A Current Apprisal of the Behavioral Sciences. Mass: Behavioral Research Council.
    Hanna, J. F., 1978: “On Transmitted Information as a Measure of Explanatory Power. in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 45, pp. 531-562.
    Harman, Gilbert, 1972: “Knowledge, Inference, and Explanation” in Feigl, Herbert, & Wilfrid Sellars (ed.) (1972) pp. 357-368.
    Hayek, Friedrich A. Von, 1952: The Counter-Revolution of Science, London: The Free Press.
    Hempel, Carl. G. and P. Oppenheim, 1948: “Studies in the Logic of Explanation” in Philosophy of Science. Vol. 15, pp. 135-175.
    Hempel, C. G., 1962: “Deductive-Nomological vs. Statistical Explanation.” in H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (ed.,) (1962). pp. 98-169.
    Hempel, C. G. 1965: Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: The Free Press.
    Hempel, C. G., 1966: The Philosophy of Natural Science, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. （何秀煌譯，六十：科學的哲學，台北：三民書局）。
    Hempel, C.G,, 1969: “Logical Positivism and Social Sciences” in P. Achinstein and S.F. Barker, (eds.)1969: The Legacy of Logical Positivism, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
    Hesse, Mary, 1980: Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, Brighton, England: The Harvester Press.
    Homans, C.G., 1964: “Contemporary Theory in Sociology”, in R.E.L. Faris,(ed.) Handbook of Modern Sociology, Chicago: Rand McNally. pp. 951-977.
    Homans, C.G., 1967: The Nature of Social Science, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. （楊念祖譯，六八：社會科學的哲學，台北：桂冠圖書公司）。
    Hospers, John, 1953: An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Huff, Toby E., 1981: “On the Methodology of the Social Science: A Review Essay” Part I, in Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Vol. 11, pp. 461-475.
    Isaak, Alan, 1975: Scope and Methods of Political Science, Illinois: The Dorsey Press. （黃紀、陳忠慶合譯，六七：政治學的範圍與方法，台北：幼獅公司）。
    Kaplan, Abraham, 1964: The Conduct of Inquiry, San Francisco: Chandler Publishing.
    Keat, Russell & John Urry, 1975: Social Theory as Science, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Kirkpatrick, E.M., 1962: “The Impace of the Behavioral Approach on Traditional Political Science” in A. Ranny, (ed.), 1962: Essays on the Behavioral Study of Politics, Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press, pp. 1-29.
    Knorr-Cetina, K.D., 1981 (a): The Manufacture of Knowledge - An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science, New York: Pergamon Press.
    Knorr-Cetina, Karin D., 1981 (b): “Social and Scientific Method or What Do We Make of the Distinction Between the Natural and the Social Sciences?” in Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Vol. 11, pp. 335-359.
    Koertge, N., 1975: “An Exploration of Salmon`s S-R Model of Explanation.” in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 42, pp. 270-274.
    Kuhn, Thomas S., 1970: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Lakatos, Imre, 1970: “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs” In Lakatos, I., and A. Musgrave,(eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-195.
    Lambert, Karel, 1980: “Explanation and Understanding” in R. Hilpinen, (ed.), 1980: Rationality in Science, Halland: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 29-34.
    Laudan, L., 1977: Progress and Its Problems, Berkeley; University of California Press.
    Lehman, H., 1972: “Statistical Explanation,” in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 500-506.
    Lessnoff, M.H., 1974: The Structure of Social Science: A Philosophical Introduction, London: Allen & Unwin.
    Louch, Alfred R., 1966: Explanation and Human Action, Berkeley-Los Angeles; University of California Press.
    McGaw, Dickinson & George Watson, 1976: Political and Social Inquiry, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
    McMullin, Ernan, 1974: “Two Faces of Science” in The Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 27, No. 4. （王弘五譯，六九：科學的兩面，刊於鵝湖月刊，66期，頁2- 13）。
    Meehan, Eugene J., 1965: The Theory and Method of Political Analysis, Homewood, Illinois: The Doresey Press.
    Meehan, E. J., 1968: Explanation in Social Science - A System Paradigm, Illinois: The Dorsey Press.
    Meehan, H. J., 1971: The Foundations of Political Analysis, Illinois: The Dorsey Press.
    Merton, Robert K., 1957: Social Theory and Social Structure. rev. edn., New York: The Free Press.
    Mohr, Lawrence B., 1982: Explaining Organizational Behavior - The Limits and Possibilities of Theory and Research, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Moon, J. Donald, 1975: “The Logic of Political Inquiry”. in Greenstein, F. I. & N.W. Polsby (ed.) 1975: Handbook of Political Science, Vol. I, London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, pp.131-228. （郭秋永譯，七一：政治研究的邏輯，刊於政治科學大全第一卷，台北：幼獅文化公司，頁167- 322）。
    Nachmias, D. & Chara Nachmias, 1981: Research Methods in the Social Sciences, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    Nagel, Ernest, 1961: The Structure of Science, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
    Nettler, Gwynn, 1970: Explanations, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
    Nowak, Stefan, 1977: Methodology of Sociological Research, Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
    Oakeshott, Michael, 1952: Rationalism in Politics and Other Esseys, London: Methuen.
    Parsons, Talcott, 1964: “Levels of Organization and the Mediation of Social Interaction”, in Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 34, pp. 207-220.
    Peters, R. S., 1958: The Concept of Motivation, London: Rout1edge & Kegan Paul.
    Pettip, P. & G. Macdonald, 1981: Semantics and Social Science, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Pinkard, Terry, 1978: “Historical Explanation and the Grammar of Theories” in Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 8, pp. 227-240.
    Popper, Karl R., 1957: The Poverty of Historicism, Boston: Becon Press. （李豐斌譯，七十：歷史定論主義的窮困，台北：聯經公司）。
    Popper, K.R., 1959: The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York: Basic Book.
    Popper, Karl P., 1972: Objective Knowledge - An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Potter, David,(ed.) 1981: Society and The Social Sciences, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, The Open University Press.
    Putnam, Hilary, 1978: Meaning & The Moral Science, Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Railton, Peter, 1978: “A Deductive-Nomological Model of Probabilistic Explanation”, in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 45, pp. 206-226.
    Reinchenbach, Hans, 1954: The Rise of Scientific Philosophy, Los Angeles: University of California Press. （吳定遠譯，六六：科學的哲學之興起，台北：水牛出版社）。
    Reichenbach, K., 1956: The Direction of Time, Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Rescher, N., 1970: Sccentific Explanation, New York: The Free Press.
    Reynolds, P. D., 1971: A Primer in Theory Construction, Indianpolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.
    Ricoeur, Paul, 1976: Interpretation Theory-Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning, Texas: The Texas Christian University Press.
    Ricoeur, Paul, 1978: Main Trends in Philosophy, New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers, Inc.
    Ritzer, G., 1975: Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Rubinstein, David., 1979: “A Critical Note on Alfred Schutz’s Concept of Explanation” in Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Vol. 9, pp. 185-187.
    Rudner, Richard S., 1966: Philosophy of Social Sciences, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.（閻子桂譯，六三：社會科學的哲學，台北：三民書局）。
    Runciman, Walter G., 1963: Social Science and Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Russell, B., 1948: Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits, New York: Simon and Shuster.
    Ryan, Alan, (ed.), 1973: Philosophy of Social Explanation, London: Oxford University Press.
    Ryan, Alan, 1981: “Is the Study of Society a Science?” in Potter, D.,(ed.,) (1981) , pp. 8-33.
    Saliers, Don E., 1978: “Explanation and Understanding in the Social Sciences: A Critique.” in Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Vol, 8, pp. 367-371.
    Salmon, W. C., 1973: “Reply of Lehman.” in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 40, pp. 397-402.
    Salmon, W., 1975: “Theoretical Explanation”, in S. Korned (ed.) Explanation, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 118-45.
    Salmon, W., 1979: “Why Ask ‘Why’? An Inquiry Concerning Scientific Explanation,” in W. Salmon, Hans Reichenbach: Logical Empiricist, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 403-25.
    Salmon, W. C., & R.C. Jeffrey, & J. G. Greeno, 1971: Statistical Explanation & Statistical Relevance. London: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    Schutz, Alfred, 1960: “The Social World and the Theory of Social Action”, in Social Research, Vol. 27, pp. 203-21.
    Schutz, Alfred, 1962: Collected Papers, Vol. I: The Problem of Social Reality, Edited by Maurice Natason. The Hague, Martinus Mijhoff.
    Schutz, Alfred, 1973: “Problems of Interpretive Sociology” in Alan Ryan (ed.) (1973), pp. 203-219.
    Scriven, M., 1962: “Explanations, Predictions, and Laws”, in Feigl and Maxwell (eds.), (1962) pp. 170-230.
    Shrader, D.W., 1977: “Causation, Explanation, and Statistical Relevance”, in Philosophy of Science. Vol. 44, pp. 136-45.
    Sjoberg, Gideon & Roger Nett, 1968: A Methodology for Social Research, New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
    Smith, H. W., 1975: Strategies of Social Research: The Methodological Imagination, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
    Smith, Ted J, III, 1980: “On the Nature and Sources of Practical Necessity” in Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Vol. 10, pp. 379-396.
    Sober, Elliott., 1984: “Common Cause Explanation”, in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 51, pp. 212-241.
    Studdert-Kennedy, G., 1975: Evidence and Explanation in Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Approach, London: Routiedge & Kegan Paul.
    Suppe, Frederick, 1977: The Structure of Scientific Theories, Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.
    Taylor, Charles, 1964: The Explanation of Behaviour, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Thagard, Paul, 1982: “From the Descriptive to the Normative in Psychology and Logic”, in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 49., pp. 24-42.
    Thompson, John B., 1981: Critical Hermeneutics - A Study in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jurgen Habermas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Toulmin, S., 1961: Foresight and Understanding, London: Hutchinson.
    Von Wright, G. H., 1971: Explanation and understanding, New York: Cornell University Press.
    Von Wright, Georg Henrik, 1972: “On So-Called Practical Inference” in Acta Sociologica, Vol. 15, pp. 39-53.
    Wallace, W. L., 1971: The Logic of Science in Sociology, Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
    Weimer, Walter B., 1979: Notes on the Methodology of Scientific Research, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
    Winch, Peter, 1958: The Idea of A Social Science and Its Relations to Philosophy, New York: Humanities Press.
    關聯: 國立政治大學
    三民主義研究所
    碩士
    73
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[國家發展研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2528檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋