English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113485/144472 (79%)
Visitors : 51390557      Online Users : 800
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101815


    Title: 從人權報導觀點分析五地 10 報新疆衝突報導框架
    Other Titles: How Different Newspapers Cover Xingjian Conflicts from Human Right Perspective? A Frame Analysis of 10 Newspapers from Taiwan, Hong Kong, Mainland China, Britain and Unites States
    Authors: 張錦華;陳莞欣
    Chang, Chin-Hwa;Chen, Wan-Hsin
    Keywords: 人權報導;三代人權;恐怖主義;新聞框架;新疆群體事件
    human rights;news frame;terrorism;Xingjian conflict
    Date: 2015-11
    Issue Date: 2016-09-09 15:05:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來新疆族群衝突事件頻發,對於這些涉及生命財產、社會秩序、族群治理等爭議之事件,本研究援用人權的觀點, 採取內容分析的方式,針對我國及中國、香港、英、美等共 10份主要報紙,比較其報導新疆衝突事件的異同。研究發現中共「官方維穩框架」為主的報導,主要強調「生命及財產」損失及「經濟社會」秩序維穩的必要,屬於第一代和第二代的人權訴求,但忽略「自由權」和「法律權」等屬於第一代公民權的訴求,也完全未曾報導「族群自決」相關的第三代人權的內涵。中央黨媒和市場導向媒體並無差異。偏「民間抗爭框架」的報導則多兼採官方和民間的來源,除了「生命財產」權外,也多報導「自由權」和「法律權」受限以及「族群自決」的問 題。臺灣 4 份報紙部份偏向官方框架,部份偏民間框架,但均 較少關注族群自決的面向。英、美 2 份質報人權報導面向較多 元,但均未報導經濟社會權面向
    Drastic increase of riots has been noted in Xingjian, the far-western Chinese region, in recent years, resulting in international media concerns about its ethnic conflicts, terrorism and human rights abuses. How different newspapers covered those conflict events from the human rights perspective? The paper aims to analyze different news frames of 10 newspapers: 4 major Taiwan newspapers, 2 China’s major newspapers, 2 Hong Kong newspapers, New York Times of US and The Guardian in Britain. Adopting a content analysis of 7 major Xingjian riots coverage during 2013/06 to 2013/12, the research finds out that there are 2 major frames, one is the China official frame, which shows less news sources with one-sided pro-regime position, accusing the protesters, concerning less human rights abuses. While the “critical frame” demonstrates more news sources from different positions, accusing both the regime and the protesters, and covering more human rights abuses.
    Relation: 新聞學研究, 125, 1-47
    Mass Communication Research
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    125-1-47.pdf1433KbAdobe PDF2349View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback