English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51715578      Online Users : 624
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101788


    Title: 冷戰時期國際人權典章中的新聞自由
    Other Titles: Freedom of the Press in International Human Rights Instruments in the Cold War Era
    Authors: 楊秀菁
    Yang, Hsiu-Chin
    Keywords: 公民與政治權利國際公約;世界人權宣言;美洲人權公約;新聞自由;歐洲人權公約
    Freedom of the press;Universal Declaration of Human Rights;International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;American Convention on Human Rights
    Date: 2014-07
    Issue Date: 2016-09-09 14:50:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文嘗試從〈世界人權宣言〉、〈公民與政治權利國際公約〉、〈歐洲人權公約〉，以及〈美洲人權公約〉等四部知名的人權典章著手，探究「新聞自由」保障內涵的轉變。原則上，〈世界人權宣言〉第19條對表現自由的保障已成為新聞自由的基本內涵，但世界各國對於是否賦予該條文所保障的積極權利──「尋求」──卻存有許多歧見。〈世界人權宣言〉僅言「不受干預」的權利，在歐美國家則更加重視不受政府或公部門干預的權利。整體觀之，這些人權典章基本上傾向第一代人權保障模式，亦即保障人民免於國家權力侵害。但其立下的權利內涵「尋求」、「接受」與「傳播」本身即帶有積極意義，賦予國家積極介入，確保新聞媒體多元發展的可能性。
    This paper discusses the content and development of freedom of the press in international human rights instruments. This study concluded that Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers”) is the foundation of other instruments. However, the rights to “active inquiry” (“to seek”) are inconsistently specified. Compared with others, European and American conventions are more concerned with freedom from interference by public authorities. In general, such conventions obviate the regulation of expression and restrict the methods and means that can be used by governments to control the media.
    Relation: 新聞學研究, 120, 167-196
    Mass Communication Research
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    120-167-196.pdf752KbAdobe PDF2251View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback