English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112881/143847 (78%)
Visitors : 50231380      Online Users : 384
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101743


    Title: 去鄰避化、素樸的自由主義與中產階級的「表演式書寫」—以「7·23」動車事故為例
    Other Titles: De-NIMBYized Naive Liberalism and Performative Writing of China`s Middle Class: A Case Study of the July 2011 Train Accident
    Authors: 吳暢暢
    WU, Chang-Chang
    Keywords: 中產階級;自由主義;動車事故;微博
    Liberalism;Micro-blog;Middle Class;Train Accident
    Date: 2012-07
    Issue Date: 2016-09-09 14:08:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文從微博文本出發,分析在「7·23」動車事故發生後,中產階級如何擺脫往常的政治「鄰避」立場,從而透過微博質疑政府的全過程及其背後動因。文章認為,律師、媒體記者與知識分子以「有機知識分子」的面目出現,成功地引領已淪為中下層的中產階級,透過微博幫助建構、型塑中國中產階級的階級意識與主體性,不過,所謂的「階級意識」最終淪為被抽象、無意義的民主化原則盲目捕獲的普世主義「智識」,並遮蔽、阻礙了他們討論、推動中國國有體制或地方吏治(或民主化)改革的具體進程的可能性,這使得中產階級在微博上的首次集體「表演」猶如曇花一現,短暫燦爛。
    This article explores the challenges against the state-owned railway system and, by extension, the entire Chinese political structure, mounted by the Chinese middle class on the blogosphere in the aftermath of a devastating train accident on July 23, 2011. The analysis underscores the pivotal “organic intellectual” role of journalists, lawyers, and public intellectuals in constructing the “class consciousness” and subjectivity of an anxious, ambivalent, and insecure networked middle class in China’s rapidly polarizing society. However, this “stand out” collective action of the Chinese middle class was the result of several contingencies, and the apparent uniformity of their speech acts concealed deep fissures. Moreover, the naive liberalism and anti-statist sloganeering that underpin the majority of microblog discourses eventually prevented any possibility of discussing and advancing a concrete process for reforming China’s state-owned system and democratizing Chinese politics.
    Relation: 新聞學研究, 112, 159-200
    Mass Communication Research
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    112-159-200.pdf642KbAdobe PDF2226View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback