English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51809892      Online Users : 295
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101672


    Title: 當「偵查不公開」遇見「新聞自由」： 警察機關與媒體記者的衝突拔河研究
    Other Titles: “Secrecy of Investigation” vs. “Freedom of the Press” A Study to Explore the Clash in the Tug of War between Police and Media Reporters
    Authors: 孫立杰;陳祥
    Sun, Lee-Jay;Chen, Hsiang
    Keywords: 偵查不公開;無罪推定;新聞自由;知的權利;第四權
    secrecy investigation;presumption of innocence;freedom of the press;the right to know;the fourth estate
    Date: 2009-10
    Issue Date: 2016-09-08 14:47:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 警察機關「偵查不公開」原則與媒體「新聞自由」理念，分別聯繫著「無罪推定」之基本人權與人民「知的權利」，前者捍衛著未經法院審判定罪之犯罪嫌疑人名譽權、隱私權及其他合法權益；後者係為監督政府施政之「第四權」，防止行政濫權之制度性功能。此兩種權利在實務上有著錯綜複雜且相互衝突之關係。本研究旨在探索「警察機關如何在不違背偵查不公開之前提下回應媒體新聞自由的要求？」及「媒體記者如何突破偵查不公開之限制以保障人民知的權利？」透過10個情境模擬之個案交叉分析模式，訪談媒體記者與警察刑案偵查隊長，透過雙方對立角度之剖析，以找尋雙方衝突之緩衝平衡點，在不違反偵查不公開之前提下滿足媒體記者新聞自由的主張。最後歸納之結論有四，分別為：1. 教育員警何種行為會違反「偵查不公開」；2. 警察應瞭解媒體需求，於合理範圍內讓媒體記者能交差；3. 藉助相關科學器材與技巧的輔助；4. 訂定出更有效之規範法律。
    The principles of “secrecy of investigation” and the right to “freedom of the press” are respectively the foundations of “presumption of innocence.” The former principle guards against most unreviewed sentences of suspects by the juridical system. The latter is so called the fourth power, and which attempts to strictly monitor governmental behaviors and in the meantime to prevent from abusing their authorities. In practice, these two principles are conflicting with one another, like the clash of tug of war, requiring a sensitive balance to both sides. This study explores two questions: “Without violating the principle of ‘secrecy of investigation’, how do the police respond to the needs requested by the freedom of press and protect the right to know?” and “How do the media reporters break the limits of secrecy of investigation to safeguard the right to know and the freedom of press?” Six simulated situations, adapted and complied from real cases, are employed as the data collecting tools to elicit both selected journalists and investigation squad chiefs by in-depth interviews. Though establishing from conflicting positions, comparisons were aimed to find out the similarities and maximum agreement between the squad chiefs and journalists. Four conclusions were reached: (1) the police should learn about which action would violate the principle of secrecy of investigation and what legal or administrative liability would ensue; (2) the police should understand the needs of the media and provide journalists with information within reasonable scope for media coverage; (3) the police should be assissted by new devices and related technologies to meet reporters’ needs; and (4) the government should cooperate with the media to modify laws which can effectively regulate related issues.
    Relation: 新聞學研究, 101, 89-138
    Mass Communication Research
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    101-89-138.pdf619KbAdobe PDF22322View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback