English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51021664      Online Users : 865
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101645


    Title: 數位時代的「記者特權」：以美國法制之發展為論述中心
    Authors: 劉靜怡
    Liu, Ching-Yi
    Keywords: 新聞自由;記者特權;新聞記者保護法;公民記者;部落客;網際網路
    Freedom of the Press;Reporter`s Privilege;Shield Law;Citizen Journalist;Bloggers;Internet
    Date: 2009-01
    Issue Date: 2016-09-08 14:36:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以數位時代的新聞自由議題為背景，探討網路媒體盛行下的部落客和公民記者所面臨的「記者特權」（reporter’s privilege）爭議。本文先從比較法的觀點，探索美國法制過去數十年來如何處理「記者特權」的主張所引發的爭議，以及其所累積的法律解釋與適用原則，對於數位時代的部落客和公民記者，將產生怎樣的影響。本文認為：「記者」究竟該如何定義，一直未能取得共識的眾說紛紜結果，主宰了幾十年來關於「記者特權」爭議不休的局面，此一爭議的嚴重性和解決迫切性，隨著網路時代部落客和公民記者的出現而昇高，透過採取「功能取向」（functional approach）的方式，有條件地賦予部落客和公民記者「記者特權」，方足以維護新聞自由在數位時代裡的完整面貌。
    This article explores the freedom of the press issues on reporters’ privilege generated by the rise of bloggers and citizen journalists against the backdrop of the Internet age. At first this article analyzes, using a comparative law approach, the reporter’s privilege doctrine developed during the last century in American legal system and then considers its applications in today’s digital lives. This article points out that the controversies surrounding the definition of “journalist” has dominated the discourse over the reporter’s privilege for several decades and has apparently become a pressing issues as the advent of the Internet gave rise to new media and unconventional way of reporting. It further suggests that any articulation of the reporter’s privilege must account for this changing nature of journalism and then proposes that all those who disseminate information to the public must be presumptively entitled to invoke the privilege’s protections. Finally, this article concludes by proposing a functional approach, a qualified privilege proposal under which the fundamental interest in preserving the value of freedom of the press and the other fundamental interest of justice and fairness will be appropriately reconciled.
    Relation: 新聞學研究, 98, 139-192
    Mass Communication Research
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    98(p.139-192).pdf545KbAdobe PDF2988View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback