政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/101198

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Master for Eminent Public Administrators > Theses > Item 140.119/101198

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101198

Title:	文化公共財之價值評估-以臺北市糖廍文化園區為例 Valuating a Cultural Public Good : The Case of Tangbu Cultural Park in Taipei City
Authors:	陳育琳 Chen, Yu Lin
Contributors:	王信實陳育琳 Chen, Yu Lin
Keywords:	條件評估法願付價格雙界二元選擇 Contingent Valuation Method Willing To Pay Double-bound Dichotomous Choice Model
Date:	2016
Issue Date:	2016-09-02 01:08:55 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	文化公共財無法透過一般市場機制評估其價格，但應如何衡量其經濟價值？本研究以臺北市萬華區糖廍文化園區為案例，以條件評估法為理論模型，並以電話訪問、網路調查及面訪訪問等3種方式獲得1,612份問卷進行分析，結果顯示願付價格會隨著人口統計變量和民眾對文化資產保存的態度而有所不同，得到平均每人每次至少消費文化公共財之願付價格約247元，如以每人平均消費一次計算價值，在95%信賴區間下，臺北市萬華區糖廍公園週邊7里約1,094萬元、臺北市萬華區約4,788萬元、臺北市約6.7億元。在目前政府財政困窘情況下，如何將上開數據轉化成地方財源收入，有效將各古蹟或歷史建築充分活化再利用將是一個值得關注的議題。 By using the contingent valuation method, this study estimates the value of the Tangbu Cultural Park in Taipei City as the value of cultural public goods cannot be directly observed through the markets. Based on 1,612 samples collected by the phone interview, on-site interview, and internet survey, we explore the factors that influence the willingness to pay (WTP) and estimate the resulting WTP on the cultural public goods. The empirical results show that the WTP are varied with the demographics and attitudes toward the cultural assets and the estimated average individual WTP per year is about 247 NTD. It turns out that the corresponding total WTP per year is 10.94 million NTD in the surrounding area of the Cultural Park, 47.88 million NTD in the Wanhua District of Taipei City, or 670 million NTD in Taipei City. The study can shed some light on the revival plans and budget arrangements of the cultural public goods.
Reference:	內政部戶政司(2016)。戶口統計速報表，2016年7月3日，取自：http://www.ris.gov.tw/346。呂惠富(2013)。國民運動中心經濟價值之評估-假設市場評價法之應用。戶外遊憩研究，26(3)，1-45。李俊鴻(2012)。文化價值認定與及其文化遺產信託基金願付價值探討。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告（編號：NSC99-2410-H-259-069-SS2），未出版。林思玲(2012)。由民眾之經濟效益觀點探討建築類文化資產保存與活化研究成果報告，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（編號：NSC100-2410-H-153-015），未出版。林思玲、邱龍禹、榮芳杰(2013)。文化資產經濟評估概念與應用。文化創意產業研究學報，3(1)，33-43。郭苔馥(2007)。文化公共財願付價格之探討-以國立傳統藝術中心為例，國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文，未出版，台北。臺北市政府秘書處(2015)。臺北市年鑑，2016年5月15日，取自：http://yearbook.taipei/ct.asp?xItem=117536555&ctNode=82490&mp=100104。臺北市政府觀光傳播局(2016)。糖廍文化園區景點資訊，2016年5月15日，取自：http://www.travel.taipei/frontsite/tw/sceneryChineseListAction.do?method=doFindByPk&menuId=2010401&serNo=2011101900000001。臺北市萬華區戶政事務所(2016)。105年各里鄰數、人口數、戶數統計表，2016年7月3日，取自：http://whhr.gov.taipei/ct.asp?xItem=156491562&ctNode=851&mp=102091。臺灣糖業股份有限公司（2006）。臺糖六十週年慶紀念專刊。臺北：臺灣糖業股份有限公司。蕭代基、鄭蕙燕、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭、溫麗琪(2003)。環境保護之成本效益分析:理論、方法與應用（初版）。臺北：俊傑書局。謝宏仁(2015)。非都會表演藝術設施觀眾特性及願付賽付價格之案例研究。建築學報，91，1179-195。 Bockstael, N. E., and C. L. Kling (1988). Valuing environmental quality: Weak complementarity with sets of goods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(3), 654-662. Brookshire, D. S., Ives, B. C., andW. D.Schulze (1976). The valuation of aesthetic preferences. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 3(4), 325-346. Cameron, T. A. (1988). A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15(3), 355-379. Cameron, T. A., and J. Quiggin (1994). Estimation using contingent valuation data from a"dichotomous choice with follow-up" questionnaire. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(3), 218-234. Cameron, T. A., and M. D. James (1987). Efficient Estimation Methods for"Closed-ended`Contingent Valuation Surveys. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(2),269-276. Crowards, T. (1997). Nonuse values and the environment: Economic and ethical motivations. Environmental Values, 143-167. Freeman, A. M. (1993). Nonuse values in natural resource damage assessment. Valuing natural assets: the economics of natural resource damage assessment, 264-303. Hanemann, W. M. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of AgriculturalEconomics, 66(3), 332-341. Hanemann, W. M. (1994). Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 19-43. Hoehn, J. P., and A.Randall (1987). A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 14(3), 226-247. Krutilla, J. V. (1967). Conservation reconsidered. The American Economic Review, 57(4), 777-786. Mitchell, R. C., andR. T. Carson (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: the contigent valuation method. Hopkins University Press. Navrud, S., and R. C. Ready (Eds.). (2002). Valuing cultural heritage: applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts. Edward Elgar Publishing. Provins, A., Pearce, D., Ozdemiroglu, E., Mourato, S., and S. Morse-Jones (2008). Valuation of the historic environment: the scope for using economic valuation evidence in the appraisal of heritage-related projects. Progress in Planning, 69(4), 131-175. Rowe, R. D., d`Arge, R. C., andD. S.Brookshire (1980). An experiment on the economic value of visibility. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 7(1), 1-19. Throsby, D. (2010). The economics of cultural policy. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press. Turner, K., D.,Pearce, and I. Bateman (1993). Environmental economics: an elementary introduction. Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins University Press.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程 102921075
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102921075
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
107501.pdf	2173Kb	Adobe PDF2	433	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...