政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/101191
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113393/144380 (79%)
Visitors : 51233660      Online Users : 889
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101191


    Title: 異質廠商、環保政策與國際貿易
    Heterogeneous Firms, Environmental Policy and International Trade
    Authors: 傅中原
    Contributors: 翁永和
    傅中原
    Keywords: 異質廠商
    國際貿易
    環保政策
    外人直接投資
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-09-02 01:06:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究主要探討環境經濟學中的三項主要的議題，分別為政府環保政策、多邊環保政策以及外人直接投資對環保稅率的效果。為了符合晚近的實證，本研究也將引進異質生產力的模型以研析上述議題。在最適環保政策一章，本研究得出最適環保政策於封閉與開放經濟體系下結論不一致，原因為家計單位可透過消費國外財貨種類以弭補本國產品種類的損失；於多邊環保政策一章，單邊環保政策無法降低全世界的總污染量，歸因於高稅率國家會將污染移轉至低稅率國家；於外人直接投資一章中，外人投資的存在不僅不能降低總污染量，反而導致污染天堂的出現。
    Reference: Aliyu, M. A. (2005). Foreign direct investment and the environment: Pollution haven hypothesis revisited. In Eight Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Lübeck, Germany.
    Baldwin, R., and Okubo, T. (2009). Tax Reform, Delocation, and Heterogeneous Firms. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 111(4), 741-764.
    Barker, T., Kohler, J., Jha, V., MarKandya, A., Vossenear, R., Redclift, M. R. and Herrera, J. (1998). International competitiveness and environmental policies. Workshop environmental policies and international competitiveness (No. E71 141). FAO, San José (Costa Rica). Consejo Agropecuario Centroamericano, San José (Costa Rica).
    Barnett, A. H. (1980). The Pigouvian taxes rule under monopoly. American Economic Review, 70(5), 1037-1041.
    Barrett, S. (1994). Strategic environmental policy and international trade. Journal of public Economics, 54(3), 325-338.
    Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., and Lawrence, R. Z. (1995). Exporters, jobs, and wages in US manufacturing: 1976-1987. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 1995, 67-119.
    Bernard, A. B., and Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both?. Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1-25.
    Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., and Kortum, S. (2003). Plants and productivity in international trade. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1268-1290.
    Bernard, A. B., and Jensen, J. B. (2004). Why some firms export. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 561-569.
    Böhringer, C., and Alexeeva‐Talebi, V. (2013). Unilateral climate policy and competitiveness: economic implications of differential emission pricing. World Economy, 36(2), 121-154.
    Bustos, P. (2011). Trade liberalization, exports, and technology upgrading: Evidence on the impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian firms. American Economic Review, 101(1), 304-340.
    Buchanan, J. M. (1969). External diseconomies, corrective taxes, and market structure. American Economic Review, 59(1), 174-177.
    Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J., and Virakul, S. (2010). Firm heterogeneity, origin of ownership and export participation. The World Economy, 33(2), 264-291.
    Cole, M. T. (2011). Not all trade restrictions are created equally. Review of World Economics, 147(3), 411-427.
    Cole, M. T., and Davies, R. B. (2011). Strategic tariffs, tariff jumping, and heterogeneous firms. European Economic Review, 55(4), 480-496.
    Condliffe, S., and Morgan, O. A. (2009). The effects of air quality regulations on the location decisions of pollution-intensive manufacturing plants. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 36(1), 83-93.
    Chung, S. (2014). Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Development Economics, 108, 222-236.
    De Santis, R. A., and Stähler, F. (2009). Foreign direct investment and environmental taxes. German Economic Review, 10(1), 115-135.
    Davies, R. B., and Eckel, C. (2010). Tax competition for heterogeneous firms with endogenous entry. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(1), 77-102.
    Cole, M. A., and Elliott, R. J. (2005). FDI and the capital intensity of “dirty” sectors: A missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle. Review of Development Economics, 9(4), 530-548.
    Dean, J. M., Lovely, M. E., and Wang, H. (2009). Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 90(1), 1-13.
    Dixit, A. K., and Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67(3), 297-308.
    Egger, H., and Kreickemeier, U. (2009). Firm heterogeneity and the labor market effects of trade liberalization. International Economic Review, 50(1), 187-216.
    Eskeland, G. S., and Harrison, A. E. (2003). Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70(1), 1-23.
    Fischer, R., and Serra, P. (2000). Standards and protection. Journal of International Economics, 52(2), 377-400.
    Friedman, J., Gerlowski, D. A., and Silberman, J. (1992). What attracts foreign multinational corporations? Evidence from branch plant location in the United States. Journal of Regional Science, 32(4), 403-418.
    Gautier, L. (2014). Policy reform of emission taxes and environmental research and development incentives in an international Cournot model with product differentiation. Environment and Development Economics, 19(4), 440-465.
    Greaker, M., and Hagem, C. (2014). Strategic investment in climate friendly technologies: The impact of global emissions trading. Environmental and Resource Economics, 59(1), 65-85.
    Gürtzgen, N., and Rauscher, M. (2000). Environmental policy, intra-industry trade and transfrontier pollution. Environmental and Resource Economics, 17(1), 59-71.
    Henderson, D. J., and Millimet, D. L. (2007). Pollution abatement costs and foreign direct investment inflows to US states: a nonparametric reassessment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 178-183.
    Hatzipanayotou, P., Lahiri, S., and Michael, M. S. (2008). Cross-border pollution, terms of trade, and welfare. Environmental and Resource Economics, 41(3), 327-345.
    Haupt, A. (2000). Environmental product standards, international trade and monopolistic competition. International Taxes and Public Finance, 7(4-5), 585-608.
    Haupt, A. (2006). Environmental policy in open economies and monopolistic competition. Environmental and Resource Economics, 33(2), 143-167.
    Helpman, E., Itskhoki, O., and Redding, S. (2008). Wages, unemployment and inequality with heterogeneous firms and workers (No. w14122). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R.. (2004). Export versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms. American Economic Review, 94(1), 300–316.
    Hoel, M. (1991). Global environmental problems: the effects of unilateral actions taken by one country. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 20(1), 55-70.
    Smarzynska, B. K., and Wei, S. J. (2001). Pollution havens and foreign direct investment: dirty secret or popular myth? (No. w8465). National bureau of economic research.
    Jeppesen, T., List, J. A., and Folmer, H. (2002). Environmental regulations and new plant location decisions: evidence from a meta‐analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 42(1), 19-49.
    Jørgensen, J. G., and Schröder, P. J. (2006). Tariffs and firm-level heterogeneous fixed export costs. Contributions in Economic Analysis and Policy, 5(1), 1-15.
    Jørgensen, J. G., and Schröder, P. J. (2008). Fixed export cost heterogeneity, trade and welfare. European Economic Review, 52(7), 1256-1274.
    Keller, W., and Levinson, A. (2002). Pollution abatement costs and foreign direct investment inflows to US states. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 691-703.
    Kennedy, P. W. (1994). Equilibrium pollution taxes in open economies with imperfect competition. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(1), 49-63.
    Kreickemeier, U., and Richter, P. M. (2014). Trade and the environment: The role of firm heterogeneity. Review of International Economics, 22(2), 209-225.
    Lahiri, S., and Ono, Y. (2007). Relative emission standard versus tax under oligopoly: the role of free entry. Journal of Economics, 91(2), 107-128.
    Lahiri, S., and Symeonidis, G. (2004). Environmental Policy Reforms under Asymmetric Oligopoly: Comparing Equiproportional and Concertina Rules, working paper.
    Lahiri, S., and Symeonidis, G. (2007). Piecemeal multilateral environmental policy reforms under asymmetric oligopoly. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9(5), 885-899.
    Lai, Y. B., and Hu, C. H. (2008). Trade agreements, domestic environmental regulation, and transboundary pollution. Resource and Energy Economics, 30(2), 209-228.
    Levinson, A. (1996). Environmental regulations and manufacturers` location choices: Evidence from the Census of Manufactures. Journal of Public Economics, 62(1), 5-29.
    Lileeva, A., and Trefler, D. (2010). Improved access to foreign markets raises plant-level productivity… for some plants. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1051-1099.
    List, J. A., Millimet, D. L., Fredriksson, P. G., and McHone, W. W. (2003). Effects of environmental regulations on manufacturing plant births: evidence from a propensity score matching estimator. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 944-952.
    Low, P., and Yeats, A. (1992). Do" dirty" industries migrate?. World Bank Discussion Papers [WORLD BANK DISCUSSION PAPER.]. 1992.
    Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725.
    Millimet, D. L., and List, J. A. (2004). The case of the missing pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 26(3), 239-262.
    Pavcnik, N. (2002). Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: Evidence from Chilean plants. Review of Economic Studies, 69(1), 245-276.
    Pflüger, M. (2001). Ecological dumping under monopolistic competition. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 103(4), 689-706.
    Porter, M. E., and Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
    Roberts, M. J., and Tybout, J. R.. (1997). The Decision to Export in Colombia: An Empirical Model of Entry with Sunk Costs. American Economic Review, 87(4), 545–564.
    Schob, R. (2005). The double-dividend hypothesis of environmental taxes: a survey. The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics, 2006, 223-279.
    Schmitt, N., and Yu, Z. (2001). Economies of scale and the volume of intra-industry trade. Economics Letters, 74(1), 127-132.
    Stimming, M. (1999). Capital-accumulation games under environmental regulation and duopolistic competition. Journal of Economics, 69(3), 267-287.
    Taylor, M. S., and Copeland, B. A. (1994). North-South trade and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 755-787.
    Turunen‐Red, A. H., and Woodland, A. D. (2004). Multilateral reforms of trade and environmental policy. Review of International Economics, 12(3), 321-336.
    Ulph, A., and Valentini, L. (2001). Is environmental dumping greater when plants are footloose?. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 103(4), 673-688.
    Wilson, J. D. (1996). Capital mobility and environmental standards: Is there a theoretical basis for a race to the bottom?. Fair trade and harmonization: Prerequisites for free trade, 1, 393-427.
    Xepapadeas, A., and de Zeeuw, A. (1999). Environmental policy and competitiveness: The Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37(2), 165-182.
    Yanase, A. (2009). Global environment and dynamic games of environmental policy in an international duopoly. Journal of Economics, 97(2), 121-140.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    經濟學系
    98258504
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098258504
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Economics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    850401.pdf1969KbAdobe PDF2414View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback