English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113392/144379 (79%)
Visitors : 51224661      Online Users : 870
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100972


    Title: 由愛丁堡一案探討歐洲專利局對人類胚胎幹細胞可專利性之立場
    Other Titles: An Analysis of the Position of European Patent Office on the Patentability of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Based on the Edinburgh Case
    Authors: 許耀華
    Hsu, Yao-Hua
    Keywords: 歐洲專利局;胚胎幹細胞;公序良俗;愛丁堡案;異議部門
    European Patent Office;Embryonic Stem Cell;“Ordre Public” or Morality;the Edinburgh Case;Opposition Division
    Date: 2005-10
    Issue Date: 2016-08-31 16:34:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 於公序良俗之考量下，人類胚胎幹細胞在歐洲專利局是否能取得專利，愛丁堡案可謂是最重要且廣受關注的案子。根據歐洲專利局異議部門之決定，人類胚胎幹細胞之研究屬於歐洲專利公約施行細則23d(c)所規定之人類胚胎商業性利用，因此屬違反公序良俗者而不予專利。 目前該案專利權人已提出上訴，於上訴決定做成之前，異議部門的決定代表著現階段歐洲專利局官方對幹細胞可專利性之立場。據此，本文由幹細胞於科學上之重要性出發，再述愛丁堡一案之申請過程與該案之異議決定理由，並對於此案後續可能發展的變數進行討論。
    The Edinburgh case can be viewed as one of the most controversial and significant issue under discussion at the European Patent Office. According to the decision made by the Opposition Division, researches relating to human embryonic stem cells pertaining to the use of human embryos for industrial or commercial purposes as stipulated in Rule 23d(c) EPC and should not be made patentable. Although the appeal filed by the patentee is still pending, however, the decision proposed by the Opposition Division does officially represent the current standpoint taken by the European Patent Office in this matter at this stage. Accordingly, the significance of stem cells in the present day scientific research field, the proceedings of the Edinburgh case and the ratiocination given by the Opposition Division, and all other major factors affecting the appeal will be discussed hereinafter.
    Relation: 政大智慧財產評論, 3(2), 33-57
    NCCU Intellectual Property Review
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[智慧財產評論] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2455View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback