English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51581724      Online Users : 990
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 俄羅斯學報 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/100833


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100833


    Title: 俄羅斯與中國政治中的車臣與台灣：兩個案例是否可以相比？
    Authors: Karpov, Mikhail V.
    Date: 2005-03
    Issue Date: 2016-08-30 14:16:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 7.或許更正確的談論應是台灣主體或甚至是台灣民族主義，而不是「台灣分離主義」，畢竟一個已經獨立的國家怎會是分離的一省？
    1. The representatives of the political, military and scientific circles of the People’s Republic of China for a number of years with confidence proclaim that the problem of “Taiwan separatism” for China is the same as the Chechnya separatism in Russia, saying thus that these two cases are completely comparable. 2. The Problem of Chechnya separatism in Russia and so called “Taiwan separatism” as this case called by official Beijing we will analyse not from the point od International Law or political morality but from the point of their, so to say, state-historical substance. 3. There must be no doubt that in case with ROC on Taiwan we deal with structurally fully substantial de-facto independent state. In ethnic and cultural sense ROC has much in common with continental China but in ideological, political and institutional respects is pretty far from Mainland. 4. The tragedy of Chechnya is that being more then ten years de-facto independent and even having winning the war Russian Federal troops in 1994-1996 the elite of the republic was unable to lay the stable foundations for the national consolidation and high degree of societal fragmentation. Neither Soviet, nor post-Soviet elite turned able to deal with the situation. 5. ROC on Taiwan never was the part of the PRC on Mainland while Chechnya was ans is a part of Russian Federation. 6. ROC on Taiwan does not constitute any terroristic danger to any country of the World, while Chechen separatists constitute such danger to Russia and a number of other countries, being a part of International terrorist network. 7. Probably, it’s more correct to speak about Taiwanese identity or even Taiwanese nationalism but not “Taiwanese separatism” because how can already independent country be a separatist one?
    Relation: 俄羅斯學報, 4, 50-51
    Journal of Russian studies
    Vestnik instituta rossii
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[俄羅斯學報] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2504View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback