政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/100527
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51197835      線上人數 : 902
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100527


    題名: 轉型期中國的單位制度因素對社會資本/網絡的影響:2004-2007
    Institutional effect of work units on social capital/networks in transitional China: 2004-2007
    作者: 劉卓林
    Liu, Zhuo lin
    貢獻者: 熊瑞梅
    Hsung, Ray May
    劉卓林
    Liu, Zhuo lin
    關鍵詞: 社會資本
    社會網絡
    單位制度
    中國市場轉型
    social capital
    social networks
    work unit
    Market transition
    日期: 2016
    上傳時間: 2016-08-22 13:14:32 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究以中研院主題計畫「社會資本的建構與效應」中，2004年至2007年兩期中國城市居民資料為研究樣本，檢視了人力資本、政治資本，以及「單位」這一中國特有的制度因素，在轉型期中國，會如何影響當代社會的個人社會資本取得與社會網絡關係的建構。
    首先，本文從林南的社會資本理論出發，闡述了個人的社會資本與社會網絡在轉型期中國如何依賴於社會制度效果。
    其次，借鑒市場轉型理論的爭論，本研究聚焦在轉型期中國的單位制度因素,在「國家-市場」的不同單位制度光譜上，如何對人力資本與政治資本轉化為個人社會資本的過程產生影響，並提出研究框架：
    個人社會資本與社會網絡，受人力資本、政治資本與單位制度因素三大機制的共同影響。其中，人力資本、政治資本對社會資本及社會網絡的取得，具有直接的效果，「國家-市場」中不同的單位制度則對這一過程產生調節作用。
    經過統計模型檢驗，本研究發現，單位制度因素確實對個人社會資本與社會網絡具有複雜的影響，特別是偏向國家的制度因素在中國市場轉型中依然發揮重要作用，預示著市場轉型中不同種類的制度規則同時存在，並深刻地影響社會資本與社會網絡的建構。
    This paper uses two waves longitudinal data of urban citizens in China from 2004 to 2007 to examine the effects of work units, as a unique institutional effect in China, human capital and political capital, on the building of personal social capital and social networks in transitional China.
    I begin from the social capital theory of Nan Lin and illustrate how personal social capital and social networks in transitional China depend on the social institutional effect.
    Next I start from the controversial around market transition theory and focus on the work unit effect in transitional China effecting on the conversions from human capital and political capital to social capital, according to the “state-market” institutional spectrum.
    Then I deliver my research framework: personal social capital and social networks are commonly affected by human capital, political capital and work unit effects. While human capital and political capital directly affects the social capital and this process is moderated by work unit effect in the “state-market” institutional spectrum.
    This paper finds out that work unit effect does complicatedly moderate on the creation of social capital and social networks, indicating that different types of social rules do coexist during the market transition and deeply influence on the building of social capital and social networks.
    參考文獻: Aguilera, M. B. (2003). The Impact of the Worker: How Social Capital and Human Capital Influence the Job Tenure of Formerly Undocumented Mexican Immigrants. Sociological Inquiry, 73(1), 52-83. doi:10.1111/1475-682X.00041
    Ao, D. (2007). Social capital and getting a job: A revisit and new direction. (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I database. (304864073)
    Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education.
    Bian, Y. (1994). Guanxi and the allocation of urban jobs in China. The China Quarterly, 140, 971-999.
    Bian, Y. (1997). Bringing Strong Ties Back in: Indirect Ties, Network Bridges, and Job Searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62(3), 366-385.
    Bian, Y. (2002). Institutional holes and job mobility processes: Guanxi mechanisms in China’s emergent labor markets. Social Connections in China: Institutions, culture, and the changing nature of Guanxi(21), 117.
    Bian, Y. (2008). The formation of social capital among Chinese urbanites: Theoretical explanation and empirical evidence. Social capital: An international research program, 81-104.
    Bian, Y., & Ang, S. (1997). Guanxi Networks and Job Mobility in China and Singapore. Social Forces, 75(3), 981-1005. doi:10.2307/2580527
    Bian, Y., & Logan, J. R. (1996). Market Transition and the Persistence of Power: The Changing Stratification System in Urban China. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 739-758.
    Boxman, E. A. W., De Graaf, P. M., & Flap, H. D. (1991). The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch managers. Social Networks, 13(1), 51-73. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(91)90013-J
    Burt, R. S. (2009). Structural holes: The social structure of competition: Harvard university press.
    Chen, Y., & Volker, B. (2016). Social capital and homophily both matter for labor market outcomes–evidence from replication and extension. Social Networks, 45, 18-31.
    Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
    Dittmer, L., & Lu, X. (1996). Personal politics in the Chinese danwei under reform. Asian Survey, 246-267.
    Dittmer, L., & Xiaobo, L. (1996). Personal politics in the Chinese danwei under reform. Asian Survey, 246-267.
    Easter, G. M. (2007). Reconstructing the state: personal networks and elite identity in Soviet Russia: Cambridge University Press.
    Erickson, B. H. (2004). The distribution of gendered social capital in Canada. Creation and returns of social capital, 27-50.
    Fan, C. C. (1995). Of Belts and Ladders: State Policy and Uneven Regional Development in Post- Mao China. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85(3), 421-449.
    Fan, C. C., & Sun, M. (2008). Regional inequality in China, 1978-2006. Eurasian geography and Economics, 49(1), 1-18.
    Flap, H., & Völker, B. (2004). Creation and returns of social capital: Routledge.
    Francis, C.-B. (1996). Reproduction of danwei institutional features in the context of China`s market economy: the case of Haidian District`s high-tech sector. The China Quarterly, 147, 839-859.
    Fu, Y.-c., Hsung, R.-m., & Lee, S.-Y. (2014). How Social Capital Is Produced during Current Job: Work Conditions and Contact Pattern. Social Capital and Its Institutional Contingency: A Study of the United States, China and Taiwan, Routledge Publisher, 173-214.
    Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 481-510.
    Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 1360-1380.
    Guan, Y.-R., Hsung, R.-M., & Lin, Y.-J. (2012). Innovation Mechanisms in Taiwan IC Industry: The Case of the Patent-Based Inventor Networks in 2001 and 2005. [Innovation Mechanisms in Taiwan IC Industry: The Case of the Patent-Based Inventor Networks in 2001 and 2005]. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 24(1), 51-82.
    Guthrie, D. (1998). The Declining Significance of Guanxi in China`s Economic Transition. The China Quarterly(154), 254-282.
    Guthrie, D. (2002). Information asymmetries and the problem of perception: The significance of structural position in assessing the importance of guanxi in China. Social Connections in China: Institutions, culture, and the changing nature of Guanxi, 3755.
    Hanser, A. (2002). Youth job searches in urban China: The use of social connections in a changing labor market. Social Connections in China: Institutions, culture, and the changing nature of Guanxi, 137-162.
    Hauser, S. M., & Xie, Y. (2005). Temporal and regional variation in earnings inequality: urban China in transition between 1988 and 1995. Social Science Research, 34(1), 44-79. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.12.002
    Ho, C. Y., & Li, D. (2008). Rising regional inequality in China: Policy regimes and structural changes*. Papers in Regional Science, 87(2), 245-259.
    Hsung, R.-m. (2014). Social Capital and Trust: Reflections on Data from the East Asia Social Capital Survey. Taiwan She Hui Xue Kan(54), 1.
    Hsung, R.-M., & Breiger, R. L. (2013). Similarities and differences in relation-specific social resources among three societies: Taiwan, China and the United States. In N. Lin, Y.-c. Fu, & C.-j. J. Chen (Eds.), Social Capital and Its Institutional Contingency: A Study of the United States, China and Taiwan: Routledge.
    Hsung, R.-M., & Breiger, R. L. (2014). Similarities and differences in relation-specific social resources among three societies: Taiwan, China and the United States.
    Hsung, R.-M., Lin, Y., Jr., & Lu, K.-W. (2013). Structural Embeddedness of Accessed Networks and Innovation at Work. Networks, Work, and Inequality, 24, 295-322.
    Hwang, K.-K. (1998). Guanxi and mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society. Intercultural Communication Studies, 7, 17-42.
    Kiong, T. C., & Kee, Y. P. (1998). Guanxi bases, Xinyong and Chinese business networks. British Journal of Sociology, 75-96.
    Lazega, E., & van Duijn, M. (1997). Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: A logistic regression model for dyadic network data. Social Networks, 19(4), 375-397. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(97)00006-3
    Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51.
    Lin, N. (2001). Guanxi: A conceptual analysis. Contributions in Sociology, 133, 153-166.
    Lin, N. (2002). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action (Vol. 19): Cambridge university press.
    Lin, N., Cook, K. S., & Burt, R. S. (2001). Social capital: Theory and research: Transaction Publishers.
    Lin, N., Ensel, W. M., & Vaughn, J. C. (1981). Social Resources and Strength of Ties: Structural Factors in Occupational Status Attainment. American Sociological Review, 46(4), 393-405.
    Lin, N., & Flap, H. (2004). Job search in urban China. Creation and returns of social capital, 145-171.
    Lin, N., Fu, Y.-c., & Chen, C.-j. J. (2013). Social Capital and Its Institutional Contingency: A Study of the United States, China and Taiwan: Routledge.
    Lin, N., Fu, Y.-c., & Hsung, R.-M. (2001). The position generator: Measurement techniques for investigations of social capital. Social capital: theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 57-81.
    Marsden, P. V., & Hurlbert, J. S. (1988). Social Resources and Mobility Outcomes: A Replication and Extension. Social Forces, 66(4), 1038-1059. doi:10.2307/2579435
    McDonald, S. (2011). What You Know or Who You Know? Occupation-specific work experience and job matching through social networks. Social Science Research, 40(6), 1664-1675. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.003
    McDonald, S., & Mair, C. A. (2010). Social Capital Across the Life Course: Age and Gendered Patterns of Network Resources1.
    Mincer, J. A. (1974). Schooling and earnings Schooling, experience, and earnings (pp. 41-63): NBER.
    Mollenhorst, G., Völker, B., & Flap, H. (2008). Social contexts and personal relationships: The effect of meeting opportunities on similarity for relationships of different strength. Social Networks, 30(1), 60-68.
    Naughton, B. (2004). Danwei: the economic foundations of a unique institution.
    Nee, V. (1989). A Theory of Market Transition: From Redistribution to Markets in State Socialism. American Sociological Review, 54(5), 663-681.
    Nee, V. (1991). Social Inequalities in Reforming State Socialism: Between Redistribution and Markets in China. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 267-282.
    Nee, V. (1996). The emergence of a market society: Changing mechanisms of stratification in China. American Journal of Sociology, 908-949.
    Nee, V., & Cao, Y. (1999). Path dependent societal transformation: Stratification in hybrid mixed economies. Theory and Society, 28(6), 799-834.
    Nee, V., & Cao, Y. (2005). Market transition and the firm: Institutional change and income inequality in urban China. Management and Organization Review, 1(1), 23-56.
    Pugliesi, K., & Shook, S. (1998). Gender, Ethnicity, and Network Characteristics: Variation in Social Support Resources1. Sex Roles, 38(3-4), 215-238. doi:10.1023/A:1018733116398
    Rona-Tas, A. (1994). The First Shall Be Last? Entrepreneurship and Communist Cadres in the Transition from Socialism. American Journal of Sociology, 100(1), 40-69.
    Rona-Tas, A., & Guseva, A. (2001). The privileges of past communist party membership in Russia and endogenous switching regression. Social Science Research, 30(4), 641-652.
    Son, J. (2012). Social capital and institutional constraints: A comparative analysis of China, Taiwan and the US: Routledge.
    Tian, F. F., & Lin, N. (2016). Weak ties, strong ties, and job mobility in urban China: 1978–2008. Social Networks, 44, 117-129.
    Völker, B., & Flap, H. (1999). Getting ahead in the GDR social capital and status attainment under communism. Acta Sociologica, 42(1), 17-34.
    Völker, B., & Flap, H. (2001). WEAK TIES AS A LIABILITY: THE CASE OF EAST GERMANY. Rationality and Society, 13(4), 397-428. doi:10.1177/104346301013004001
    Völker, B., Flap, H., & Mollenhorst, G. (2009). Changing places. The influence of meeting places on recruiting friends. Contexts of social capital: Social networks in communities, markets and organizations. Oxford: Routledge, 28-48.
    Van der Gaag, M., Snijders, T. A., & Flap, H. D. (2008). Position Generator measures and their relationship to other Social Capital measures. Social capital: An international research program, 27-49.
    Walder, A. G. (1988). Communist neo-traditionalism: Work and authority in Chinese industry: Univ of California Press.
    Walder, A. G. (1994). The decline of communist power: Elements of a theory of institutional change. Theory and Society, 23(2), 297-323.
    Walder, A. G. (1995). Career mobility and the communist political order. American Sociological Review, 309-328.
    Wei, Z., & Xueguang, Z. (2004). Chinese Organizations in Transition: Changing Promotion Patterns in the Reform Era. Organization Science, 15(2), 186-199. doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0046
    Wu, F. (2002). China`s changing urban governance in the transition towards a more market-oriented economy. Urban Studies, 39(7), 1071-1093.
    Wu, S. (2007). Structural and Individual Determinants of Social Capital---A Multilevel Analysis. Paper presented at the international social capital conference Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Wu, X. (2002). Work Units and Income Inequality: The Effect of Market Transition in Urban China. Social Forces, 80(3), 1069-1099.
    Wu, X. (2006). Communist Cadres and Market Opportunities: Entry into Self-Employment in China, 1978-1996. Social Forces, 85(1), 389-411.
    Wu, X., & Xie, Y. (2003). Does the Market Pay off? Earnings Returns to Education in Urban China. American Sociological Review, 68(3), 425-442.
    Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. (2007). When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 1-31.
    Xie, Y., & Hannum, E. (1996). Regional variation in earnings inequality in reform-era urban China. American Journal of Sociology, 950-992.
    Xie, Y., Lai, Q., & Wu, X. (2009). Danwei and social inequality in contemporary urban China. Sociology of Work, 19, 283-306.
    Xie, Y., & Wu, X. (2008). Danwei Profitability and Earnings Inequality in Urban China. The China Quarterly(195), 558-581.
    Yakubovich, V. (2005). Weak Ties, Information, and Influence: How Workers Find Jobs in a Local Russian Labor Market. American Sociological Review, 70(3), 408-421.
    Yang, M. M.-h. (2002). The resilience of guanxi and its new deployments: A critique of some new guanxi scholarship. The China Quarterly, 170, 459-476.
    Zhang, Y., & Lin, N. (2015). Hiring for Networks: Social Capital and Staffing Practices in Transitional China. Human Resource Management.
    Zhao, W., & Zhou, X. (2002). Institutional transformation and returns to education in urban China: An empirical assessment. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 19, 339-375. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0276-5624(02)80046-4
    Zhao, W., & Zhou, X. (2004). Chinese Organizations in Transition: Changing Promotion Patterns in the Reform Era. Organization Science, 15(2), 186-199. doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0046
    Zhou, X. (2000a). Economic Transformation and Income Inequality in Urban China: Evidence from Panel Data. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 1135-1174.
    Zhou, X. (2000b). Reply: Beyond the debate and toward substantive institutional analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 1190-1195.
    Zhou, X., & Suhomlinova, O. (2001). Redistribution under state socialism: A USSR and PRC comparison. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 18, 163-204.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    社會學系
    102254020
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1022540202
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[社會學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    020201.pdf878KbAdobe PDF274檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋