政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/100448
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51259835      Online Users : 845
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100448


    Title: 董監連結與策略聯盟之關聯性研究
    An Empirical Study of the Association between Board Interlock and Strategic Alliances
    Authors: 許銘珈
    Contributors: 梁嘉紋
    許銘珈
    Keywords: 董監連結
    策略聯盟
    社會資本
    Board Interlock
    Strategic Alliance
    Social Capital
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-08-22 10:41:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 董監連結為社交網絡的一種型態，扮演著不同公司間其中一種相互溝
    通、交流的管道，一般而言任職於不同公司的董監事將獲得公司資訊，透過兼任
    不同公司的董監事之交流，公司資訊將藉由此種社交網絡散佈傳遞於公司間，並
    影響公司的商業行為與策略。本研究主要探討此種社交網絡是否影響公司策略聯
    盟之形成，以及是否提升形成策略聯盟之可能性；此外本研究亦反向探討公司間
    正式的策略聯盟是否會影響公司間董監連結之形成，以及是否提升董監連結之可
    能性。本研究以 2004 年至 2013 年間美國的上市櫃公司為樣本，研究結果顯示公
    司的董監連結對於公司策略聯盟形成有正向影響，顯示當公司間過去擁有董監連
    結則公司將會提升其形成策略聯盟及形成越多策略聯盟之可能性；此外公司擁有
    策略聯盟亦將對董監連結有正向影響，顯示公司間擁有策略聯盟亦將會提升公司
    形成董監連結之可能性。透過本文之額外測試，發現產業總體環境形成策略聯盟
    之多寡提升形成策略聯盟之可能性。
    This study examines the association between board interlock and strategic
    alliances. Board interlock is considered as important social networks and it is a
    channel of mutual communication and interaction among different companies. In
    general, directors appointed by different companies can potentially acquire
    information about the business conduct. Through board interlock, corporate
    information then spreads and influences business practices and strategies among
    companies in the business social network. This study investigates whether board
    interlock has an impact on the formation of strategic alliance among companies and
    increases the possibility of forming strategic alliances and whether strategic alliances
    among companies would facilitate the formation of board interlock. Based on a
    sample of listed companies in the United States from 2004 to 2013, the result shows
    that board interlock has positive impact on the formation of strategic alliances,
    indicating that board interlock among companies increases the likelihood and the
    number of strategic alliances. Besides, the results show that companies with strategic
    alliances are more likely to facilitate board interlock.
    Reference: 一、 中文部分
    吳克，2011.02，策略聯盟的兩難，聯經出版事業公司。
    汪海波、羅莉、吳為、孟玲、楊世宏、汪海玲，2015.03，上奇資訊股份有限公司。
    黃台心，2009.07，計量經濟學，新陸書局股份有限公司。
    林祖嘉、徐美，工作轉換、工資差異、與學用配合：Two-stage switching regression
    模型之應用，國立政治大學經濟系教授、國立台北大學經濟系副教授。
    譚寧，2013，法人說明會與董監事連結之關聯，國立政治大學會計學系碩士。
    王文伶，2010，台灣電子業董監事及高階管理者連結與公司績效之關聯研究，
    國立政治大學會計學系碩士。
    經濟日報，2014.09.25，聯手攻 4G 鴻海將與台灣大策略聯盟。
    自立晚報，2014.06.30，三信銀行攜手第一銀行邁向黃金百年。
    詹文男，經濟日報，2014.10.08，透視鏡/三新策略提升競爭力。
    陳曉莉，2013.06.05，甲骨文與 Dell 策略聯盟共同發展整合式系統。
    2013.06.18，Accenture and GE Form Global Strategic Alliance to Develop Advanced
    Applications that Leverage Industrial Strength Big Data to Drive Efficiency and
    Productivity。
    二、 英文部分
    Aaker, D. A. (1992).Developing business strategies, 26. Wiley.
    Ahuja, G. (2000a). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal
    study. Administrative science quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
    Ahuja, G. (2000b). The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the
    formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic management journal, 21(3), 317-343.
    Amburgey, T. L., & Miner, A. S. (1992). Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive,
    positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strategic management
    journal, 13(5), 335-348.
    Amburgey, T. L., Kelly, D., & Barnett, W. P. (1990, August). Resetting the Clock: The
    dynamics of organizational change and failure. Academy of management
    proceedings, 1990(1), 160-164. Academy of Management.
    Amburgey, T. L., Dacin, T., & Singh, J. V. (1996). Learning races, patent races, and capital
    races: Strategic interaction and embeddedness within organizational fields. Advances in
    strategic management, 13, 303-322.
    Anand, B. N., & Khanna, T. (2000). Do firms learn to create value? The case of
    alliances. Strategic management journal, 21(3), 295-315.
    Andrews, K. R. (1980). Directors’ responsibility for contingency model of corporate
    strategy. Harvard business review, 30.
    Arregle, J. L., Amburgey, T., & Dacin, T. (1997). Strategic alliances and firm capabilities:
    Strategy and structure. Strategic management society conference, Phoenix, AZ.
    Baker, W. E. (1984). The social structure of a national securities market. American journal of
    sociology, 775-811.
    Balakrishnan, S., & Koza, M. P. (1993). Information asymmetry, adverse selection and
    joint-ventures: Theory and evidence. Journal of economic behavior &
    organization, 20(1), 99-117.
    Barnea, A., & Guedj, I. (2006). `But, Mom, All the Other Kids Have One!`-CEO
    Compensation and Director Networks. McCombs business research paper No.
    FIN-04-06.
    Barley, S. R., Freeman, J., & Hybels, R. C. (1992). Strategic alliances in commercial
    biotechnology. Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, 311-347.
    Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of
    management, 17(1), 99-120.
    Bizjak, J., Lemmon, M., & Whitby, R. (2009). Option backdating and board
    interlocks. Review of financial studies, 22(11), 4821-4847.
    Boeker, W. (1997). Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager
    movement on product-market entry. Administrative science quarterly, 213-236.
    Berg, S. V., Duncan, J., & Friedman, P. (1982). Joint venture strategies and corporate
    innovation. Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
    Burt, R. S. (1982). Toward a structural theory of action: network models of social Structure,
    Perception, and Action.
    Burt, R. S. (1983). Corporate profits and cooptation: Networks of market constraints and
    directorate ties in the American economy. New York: Academic Press.
    Burt, R. S., & Knez, M. (1995). Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality and
    society, 7(3), 255-292.
    Chan, S. H., Kensinger, J. W., Keown, A. J., & Martin, J. D. (1997). Do strategic alliances
    create value?. Journal of financial economics, 46(2), 199-221.
    Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning
    and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.
    Combs, J. G., & Ketchen, D. J. (1999). Can capital scarcity help agency theory explain
    franchising? Revisiting the capital scarcity hypothesis. Academy of management
    journal, 42(2), 196-207.
    Contractor, F. J., & Lorange, P. (1988). Why should firms cooperate? The strategy and
    economics basis for cooperative ventures. Cooperative strategies in international
    business, 3-30.
    Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief
    executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of financial
    economics, 51(3), 371-406.
    Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors
    and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of management journal, 42(6),
    674-686.
    Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the
    intercorporate network. Administrative science quarterly, 583-613.
    Davis, G. F., & Greve, H. R. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the
    1980s. American journal of sociology, 103(1), 1-37.
    DeFond, M. L., & Park, C. W. (1999). The effect of competition on CEO turnover. Journal of
    accounting and economics, 27(1), 35-56.
    Demirkan, S., & Demirkan, I. (2014). Implications of strategic alliances for earnings quality
    and capital market investors. Journal of business research,67(9), 1806-1816.
    Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive
    advantage. Management science, 35(12), 1504-1511.
    Dore, R. (1983). Goodwill and the spirit of market capitalism. British journal of sociology,
    459-482.
    Doz, Y. L. (1996). The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or
    learning processes?. Strategic management journal, 17(S1), 55-83.
    Dyer, J. H. (1996). Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage:
    Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic management journal, 17(4), 271-291.
    Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of
    interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(4),
    660-679.
    Eccles, R. G. (1981). The quasifirm in the construction industry. Journal of economic
    behavior & organization, 2(4), 335-357.
    Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance
    formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization
    Science, 7(2), 136-150.
    Fich, E., & White, L. J. (2003). CEO compensation and turnover: The effects of mutually
    interlocked boards. Wake Forest L. Rev., 38, 935.
    Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors? The journal of
    finance, 61(2), 689-724.
    Frazzini, A., Malloy, C. J., & Cohen, L. (2008). Sell side school ties. NBER Working Paper,
    (w13973).
    Freidheim Jr, C. F. (1999). The battle of the alliances. Management review, 88(8), 46.
    Fuller, M. B., & Porter, M. E. (1986). Coalitions and Global Strategy from. Competition in
    global industries, 315-344.
    Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Interorganizational relations. Annual review of sociology, 281-304.
    Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. (1989). Mimetic processes within an interorganizational
    field: An empirical test. Administrative science quarterly, 454-479.
    Garvey, G., & Milbourn, T. (2003). Incentive compensation when executives can hedge the
    market: Evidence of relative performance evaluation in the cross section. The journal of
    finance, 58(4), 1557-1582.
    Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of
    embeddedness. American journal of sociology, 481-510.
    Gulati, R., Khanna, T., & Nohria, N. (1994). Unilateral commitments and the importance of
    process in alliances. MIT Sloan Management Review, 35(3), 61.
    Gulati, R. (1995a). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for
    contractual choice in alliances. Academy of management journal, 38(1), 85-112.
    Gulati, R. (1995b). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal
    analysis. Administrative science quarterly, 619-652.
    Gulati, R., & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs
    and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances.Administrative science quarterly,
    781-814.
    Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and
    firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic management journal, 20(5), 397-420.
    Gulati, R., & Westphal, J. D. (1999). Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board
    relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative
    Science Quarterly, 44(3), 473-506.
    Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Interorganizational modes of cooperation. Strategic management
    journal, 14, 371-385.
    Hallock, K. F. (1997). Reciprocally interlocking boards of directors and executive
    compensation. Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis, 32(3), 331-344.
    Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Collaborate with your competitors and
    win. Harvard business review, 67(1), 133-139.
    Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international
    strategic alliances. Strategic management journal, 12(4), 83-103.
    Harrigan, K. R. (1988). Joint ventures and competitive strategy. Strategic management
    journal,9(2), 141-158.
    Harrigan, K. R. (1986). Managing for joint venture success. Simon and Schuster.
    Harrison, J. S., Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. (2001). Resource
    complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational
    alliances. Journal of management, 27(6), 679-690.
    Haunschild, P. R. (1993). Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate
    acquisition activity. Administrative science quarterly, 564-592.
    Jones, T. M., & Goldberg, L. D. (1982). Governing the large corporation: More arguments for
    public directors. Academy of management review, 7(4), 603-611.
    Khanna, T., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N. (1994, August). Alliances as learning races. Academy
    of management proceedings,1994(1), 42-46. Academy of Management.
    Khanna, T., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N. (1998). The dynamics of learning alliances:
    Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic management journal,19(3),
    193-210.
    Khurana, R. (2004). Searching for a corporate savior: The irrational quest for charismatic
    CEOs. Princeton University Press.
    Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic
    management journal, 9(4), 319-332.
    Kogut, B. (1989). The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry. The
    Journal of Industrial Economics, 183-198.
    Kogut, B., Shan, W., & Walker, G. (1992). The make-or-cooperate decision in the context of
    an industry network. Networks and organizations, 348-365.
    Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (2002). Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional
    view. Strategic management journal, 23(9), 795-816.
    Kramarz, F., & Thesmar, D. (2013). Social networks in the boardroom. Journal of the
    European Economic Association, 11(4), 780-807.
    Kreps, D. M. (1996). Corporate culture and economic theory. Firms, organizations and
    contracts, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 221-275.
    Krishnan, G. V., Raman, K. K., Yang, K., & Yu, W. (2011). CFO/CEO-board social ties,
    Sarbanes-Oxley, and earnings management. Accounting Horizons,25(3), 537-557.
    Larcker, D. F., Richardson, S. A., Seary, A., & Tuna, A. (2005). Back door links between
    directors and executive compensation. Back Door Links Between Directors and
    Executive Compensation (February 2005).
    Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic management
    journal, 14(S2), 95-112.
    Lyles, M. A. (1987). Learning among joint venture sophisticated firms. BEBR faculty working
    paper; no. 1366.
    Madhavan, R., Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (1998). Networks in transition: How industry
    events (re) shape interfirm relationships. Strategic management journal, 19(5), 439-459.
    Mariti, P., & Smiley, R. H. (1983). Co-operative agreements and the organization of
    industry. The journal of industrial economics, 437-451.
    McKelvey, R. D., & Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level
    dependent variables. Journal of mathematical sociology, 4(1), 103-120.
    Mintz, B., & Schwartz, M. (1981). Interlocking directorates and interest group
    formation. American Sociological Review, 851-869.
    Mizruchi, M. S. (1982). The American corporate network, 1904-1974 (Vol. 138). Sage
    Publications, Inc.
    Mizruchi, M. S. (1992). The structure of corporate political action: Interfirm relations and
    their consequences. Harvard University Press.
    Mizruchi, M. S., & Stearns, L. B. (1988). A longitudinal study of the formation of
    interlocking directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 194-210.
    Mowery, D. C. (Ed.). (1988). International collaborative ventures in US manufacturing.
    Ballinger Publishing Company.
    Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (2009). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard
    University Press.
    Palmer, D. (1983). Broken ties: Interlocking directorates and intercorporate
    coordination. Administrative science quarterly, 40-55.
    Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost
    examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of management journal, 36(4), 794-829.
    Pennings, J. M. (1980). Interlocking directorates Jossey-Bass San Francisco California USA.
    Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations New York.
    Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social
    determinants of economic action. American journal of sociology, 1320-1350.
    Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization, 295-336.
    Greenwich, CT.
    Powell, W. W., & Brantley, P. (1992). Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: Learning
    through networks. Networks and organizations, 366-394.
    Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration
    and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative
    science quarterly, 116-145.
    Raub, W., & Weesie, J. (1990). Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example
    of network effects. American journal of sociology, 626-654.
    Rechner, P. L. Dalton. DR (1991). Board composition and shareholders’ wealth: An empirical
    assessment. Strategic management journal, 12(2), 155-160.
    Rosenkopf, L., & Schleicher, T. (2008). Below the tip of the iceberg: the co‐evolution of
    formal and informal interorganizational relations in the wireless telecommunications
    industry. Managerial and decision economics, 29(5), 425-441.
    Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative
    interorganizational relationships. Academy of management review,19(1), 90-118.
    Shane, S. A. (1996). Hybrid organizational arrangements and their implications for firm
    growth and survival: A study of new franchisors. Academy of management
    journal, 39(1), 216-234.
    Stuart, T. E. (1998). Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of
    strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative science
    quarterly, 668-698.
    Stuart, T. E., & Yim, S. (2010). Board interlocks and the propensity to be targeted in private
    equity transactions. Journal of financial economics, 97(1), 174-189.
    Useem, M. (1982). Classwide rationality in the politics of managers and directors of large
    corporations in the United States and Great Britain. Administrative science quarterly,
    199-226.
    Useem, M. (1984). The inner circle, 617. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Vance, S. C. (1983). Corporate leadership: Boards, directors, and strategy. McGraw-Hill
    Companies.
    Venkatraman, N., Loh, L., & Koh, J. (1994). The adoption of corporate governance
    mechanisms: a test of competing diffusion models. Management science, 40(4),
    496-507.
    Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation
    of an industry network. Organization science, 8(2), 109-125.
    Zaheer, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Relational governance as an interorganizational
    strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic
    management journal, 16(5), 373-392.
    Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance:
    A review and integrative model. Journal of management, 15(2), 291-334.
    Zajac, E. J. (1988). Interlocking directorates as an interorganizational strategy: A test of
    critical assumptions. Academy of management journal, 31(2), 428-438.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    102353104
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102353104
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    310401.pdf1338KbAdobe PDF2616View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback