政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/100195
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113485/144472 (79%)
Visitors : 51389708      Online Users : 154
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100195


    Title: 從Pareto效率到Marshall效率:論制度的經濟效率性評析
    Other Titles: From Pareto Efficiency to Marshall Efficiency: On the Evaluation of Economic Efficiency of Institutions
    Authors: 胡海豐
    Hu, Hai-Feng
    Keywords: Pareto效率;Marshall效率;效用;自願交換
    Pareto Efficiency;Marshall Efficiency;Utility;Voluntary Exchange
    Date: 2011-10
    Issue Date: 2016-08-16 13:34:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 一般在社會科學領域,Pareto效率經常是用來衡量制度經濟效率性的準則。惟其要求不能傷害任何一位行為人的嚴格定義,使其在實務的運用上並不可行,因此,Marshall效率的「極大化總剩餘」定義,成為另一種比較可操作的標準。本文說明了制度的設計,首先必須滿足Marshall效率的要求,再進一步搭配強制補償受損者的措施,則此「聯合制度」將也可滿足嚴格的Pareto效率。另外,利用這兩種效率準則與行為人「主觀效用」的連結,本文嘗試定義一種個體角度的經濟效率,這種個體面的效率準則,可以反映出經濟效率的「相對性」。最後,本文也說明了「自願交換」的機制,可以提升制度實施的經濟效率性,可同時符合Marshall效率與Pareto效率的要求。
    In the field of social science, "Pareto efficiency" is a commonly used criterion for evaluating institutional efficiency. However, the strict limitation of Pareto efficiency that no harm should be imposed on anyone, makes it impractical. Therefore, the "Marshall efficiency", which aims at maximizing the total surplus, becomes a useful alternative. This paper indicates that the design of institutions should first satisfy the Marshall efficiency in advance and further compensate the individuals who suffer in the system. Thus joint institution could satisfy the strict Pareto efficiency too. In addition, this paper makes a connection between economic efficiency and individual`s utility levels. Based on this connection, this paper attempts to define a concept of local efficiency, which could reflect effectively the relativity of economic efficiency. Lastly, this paper illustrates that the "voluntary exchange" can improve institutional efficiency. Voluntary exchange will satisfy not only the Marshall efficiency but also the Pareto efficiency.
    Relation: 社會科學論叢, 5(2), 34-59
    Journal of Social Sciences
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Journal of Social Sciences] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    5(2)-34-59.pdf3002KbAdobe PDF2446View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback