English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50917640      Online Users : 910
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100191


    Title: 國家發展研究主導概念之變化及其政策意涵
    Other Titles: The Change of Leading Concepts in the Study of National Development and its PolicyImplications
    Authors: 龐建國
    Pang, Chien-Kuo
    Keywords: 現代性;現代化;依賴;世界體系;發展型國家;全球化
    modernity;modernization;dependency;the world-system;the developmental state;globalization
    Date: 2010-10
    Issue Date: 2016-08-16 13:33:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 社會科學理論的建構和演進，基本上受到時代環境和思想傳承兩方面因素的影響，以思想傳承脈絡為經，時代環境段落為緯，我們可以描繪出社會科學理論較為清晰完整的面貌，並對其相關意涵有比較深刻的認識。同時，從「範式移轉」的角度來看，國家發展研究在不同時期呈現出不同的主流範式或主流觀點，這些範式或觀點可以藉由某個具有主導性意義的概念來簡明的標舉。本文認為，現代化、依賴、世界體系、發展型國家和全球化，分別標誌了第二次世界大戰之後國家發展研究不同時期的主導概念，它們各自代表著不同的研究範式或理論觀點，並意味著不同的政策主張，但基本上都可以從現代性的傳播和回應來理解。
    The construction and evolution of the theories in social sciences are influenced primarily by two aspects, namely, historical context and theoretical heritage. Taking historical context and theoretical heritage into account, we will be able to describe the features and comprehend the related implications of the theories. From the perspective of “paradigm shift”, we can figure out dominant paradigms or perspectives in the study of national development for different periods of time and present them concisely with relevant leading concepts. This article intends to point out these leading concepts. The author’s argument is that modernization, dependency, the world-system, the developmental state and globalization mark out the leading concepts in the study of national development for different periods of time since the end of the Second World War. These leading concepts represent different research paradigms and suggest different policy implications. All of these evolutions, however, can be understood as the diffusions and responses of modernity.
    Relation: 社會科學論叢, 4(2), 104-154
    Journal of Social Sciences
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[社會科學論叢] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    4(2)-104-154.pdf3132KbAdobe PDF2776View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback