政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/100144
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 114503/145531 (79%)
造訪人次 : 53422839      線上人數 : 976
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100144


    題名: 從西田哲學來看前期海德格「實存論的獨我論」
    其他題名: On The “Existential Solipsism” in Early Heidegger: In View of Nishida`s Philosophy
    作者: 黃文宏
    HUANG, Wen-Hong
    關鍵詞: 西田幾多郎;海德格;絕對無;存在;本真性
    Nishida;Heidegger;Absolute Nothingness;Being;Self-awareness
    日期: 2014-01
    上傳時間: 2016-08-11 16:41:12 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文探討前期海德格中「實存論的獨我論」的主張，並且試著從西 田幾多郎哲學的角度來反省這個問題。文獻依據主要在海德格的《存在與 時間》(1927) 與西田的〈我與汝〉(1932)。文章區分為四個章節，首先（壹） 在陳述本文的詮釋方法與獨我論的問題之後，我們接著致力於重構海德格 對「他者的經驗」的說明。對海德格來說，我們任何的與存在物的遭遇都 是詮釋性的，他者的經驗亦同。我們注意到海德格最先談到他者經驗的地 方在手許物的指示關係上，我們鋪陳這個思路（貳），在措詞上特別著重 於存在與存在物的差異，「存在論的差異」是理解《存在與時間》的核心。\\r 在這裏由手許物的指示關係所指示的「他者」雖然無法窮盡他者的意義，但反而可以顯示世界作為「有意義性」（或譯為「意蘊性」）的基本思路，\\r 顯示出由不安的死所滑落的世界的基本形式構造。但是世界的意義並不止 於此，對海德格來說，此在的世界是共存在的世界。本文接著（參）分析 了，本真的與非本真的「共存在」與「相互共存在」，並且從西田哲學的 角度，反省海德格實存論的獨我論的意義。最後（肆）筆者個人的看法在 於：西田「無的自覺」的想法可以為現象學所要求的回歸實事本身提供一 個可能的思考空間。
    In this paper I attempt to throw some light on the basic meanings of "existential solipsism" in early Heidegger and propose some critical response from Nishida’s philosophy. My paper is divided into four sections. After a brief explication of the problematic the article (section one), I then try to reconstruct Heidegger`s theory of the encounter with the others in his Being and Time. It is well known that Heidegger breaks the inner-outer distinction of Cartesian philosophy and begins his philosophy from the analysis of existence of Dasein. For Heidegger the encountering with entities as entities, and therefore others as others, is interpretative. The meaning of the other cannot be exhausted through the encounter with the ready-to-hand equipment (section two). Our world is fundamentally shared with the others. Heidegger bases his theory of others on the notion of “being-with” (Mitsein) and “being-with-one-another” (Miteinandersein) and gives a purely descriptive account of our pre-theoretical involvement with the other which constitutes the inauthenticity of our “being-with”\\r and “being-with-one-another”. I reconstruct the path which leading form inauthentic encounter with others to the authentic encounter with others (section three). It is my view that (section four) Heidegger`s early philosophy is still a form of solipsism, which should be overcome from Nishida`s philosophy of nothingness.
    關聯: 政治大學哲學學報, 31, 31-65
    The national Chengchi university philosophical
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    31-31-65.pdf641KbAdobe PDF2404檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋