政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/100126
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51155338      Online Users : 858
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100126


    Title: 論《阿含經》中「無常即苦」之命題
    Other Titles: On the Proposition “Whatever is Impermanent is Dukkha” in the Āgamas
    Authors: 洪嘉琳
    HONG, Chia-Lynne
    Keywords: 阿含經;無常;苦;苦受;傾向
    Āgamas;Impermanence;Dukkha;Feeling of Suffering;Disposition
    Date: 2011-07
    Issue Date: 2016-08-11 16:06:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 就《阿含經》及其所代表之初期佛教而言，「無常即苦」之命題可謂基礎教理之緣起法與「一切行苦」命題之橋樑，亦作為解釋「一切行苦」乃至「苦聖諦」之關鍵。然而，於解釋上述教理時，學界鮮少深入析論「無常即苦」之命題──無論是對於「無常」與「苦」之關係、或是「苦」與「苦受」之關係，其見解均略欠清晰。 針對「無常即苦」之命題，本文將先就其邏輯結構來探討，一方面將確認其作為一全稱命題，一方面亦將指出其中「無常」與「苦」之順序不得顛倒。其次，本文分別就上述二點指出，若直接以「苦受」來解讀，「無常即苦」之命題將與某些《阿含經》經文相抵觸。再其次，本文認為「無常即苦」之「苦」，宜理解為「會導致生命體苦受之傾向」。故此一命題可表達如下：「對所有的 x 而言，若 x 為無常的，則 x 有會導致生命體苦受之傾向。」
    The proposition “whatever is impermanent is dukkha (yad-aniccaṃ taṃ dukkhaṃ)” (henceforth abbreviated as YATD) plays a crucial role in early Buddhism. Preserved in the Pāli Nikāyas and the Chinese Āgamas, this proposition connects the basic doctrine of dependent origination with such propositions as “every compounded thing is dukkha” as well as with the Noble Truth of Suffering. However, we rarely find a detailed analysis of YATD in current scholarship. As a result, the meaning of ‘dukkha’ as well as the relation between ‘dukkha’ and ‘impermanent’ remains largely unclear. This paper discusses YATD in three steps. First, as to its logical form, I observe that YATD constitutes a universal proposition and that the order between the concepts of “impermanent” and “dukkha” is not to be reversed. Second, I argue against interpreting ‘dukkha’ simply as “feelings of suffering,” as this leads to problematic readings of YATD in the Āgamas. Third, I propose that ‘dukkha’ in YATD should be interpreted as a disposition that causes sentient beings the feelings of suffering. Based on this proposal, I suggest that YATD be read as “whatever is impermanent is of a disposition of causing sentient beings the feelings of suffering.”
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 26, 97-145
    The national Chengchi university philosophical
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[NCCU Philosophical Journal] Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    26-97-145.pdf734KbAdobe PDF2172View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback