政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/100118
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50940934      線上人數 : 967
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100118


    題名: 馬希翁的第三還原：向他者的宗教經驗敞開
    其他題名: The Third Reduction of Jean-Luc Marion: Towards the Call of Other
    作者: 曾慶豹;林靜秀
    Pa, Chin-Ken;Lin, Ching-Hsiu
    關鍵詞: 馬希翁;胡賽爾;海德格;德希達;還原;直觀;他人
    Jean-Luc Marion;Martin Heidegger;Jacques Derrida;reduction;intuition;other
    日期: 2010-07
    上傳時間: 2016-08-11 16:00:00 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 胡塞爾號召「回到事物自身」啟發廿世紀如火如荼的現象學運動，但是他訴求還原方法讓人質疑有走向獨我論的超驗現象學之嫌，因此接續現象學運動的海德格與德希達毫不猶疑的指責，批評胡塞爾停留在顯現直觀、感覺直觀上，以為現象學必須另謀出路。但是，馬希翁卻以為胡塞爾訴求還原並非切斷與自然態度的關聯回到超驗主體，反而這樣的做法脫離不了自然態度而回到與世界的關聯，於是他從海德格訴求存有者的存有，了解到感覺直觀必然已有範疇直觀、本質直觀，對象的肉身顯現還有其意義產生，他從德希達「衍異」概念訴求異於顯現的語言符號，了解到直觀作為顯現的直觀在於現象既與的優先性，顯現類似索引在作為純粹的他人的呼召形式。因此，對於馬希翁而言還原並不像是胡塞爾回到顯現，也不像是海德格回到存有，而是在作為現象的自我既與，所以他總結現象學發展的歷史提出：「有多少還原，就有多少既與」。
    “Phenomenology” as a movement has its origins in transcendental phenomenology of Edmund Husserl. Husserl asserts the primacy of transcendental reduction, and makes it a philosophical method to serve a scientific basis for all knowing. Reduction seems to focus on a reduction to objective, ”present” phenomena. People find Husserl’s phenomenology of transcendental consciousness as a “metaphysics of presence”(following Heidegger, Derrida). They attack Husserl’s presentive intution is nothing but to free presence from any condition. Marion finds different insight in Husserl’s work. Phenomenology is concerned with concrete acts of meaning-intendings, not as empirically occurring facts, but they have intentional, a priori structure. Husserl proposes a categorical intuition side by side with sensory intuition. Heidegger seeks the conceptual groundwork to understand his own question of the Being of beings. He reveals that everything perceived bodily is in signification. In agreement with Heidegger, Derrida believes signification without intuition, and stresses the sign foreign to presence. For Marion, presentive intuition insists neither presence, nor being, but the primacy of givenness of phenomenon. It means that presence is pure form of the call from other. He is thus led to posit a formulation like “the more reduction, the more givenness”.
    關聯: 政治大學哲學學報, 24, 77-106
    The national Chengchi university philosophical
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    24-77-106.pdf412KbAdobe PDF2227檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋