English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50802833      Online Users : 771
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100064


    Title: 台灣科學哲學的首航：殷海光的科學哲學
    Other Titles: The Pioneering of Contemporary Taiwan’s Philosophy of Science: Yin Hai-Kuang’s Philosophy of Science
    Authors: 陳瑞麟
    Chen, Ruey-Lin
    Keywords: 殷海光;科學哲學;邏輯經驗論;台灣哲學史
    Yin Hai-Kuang;philosophy of science;logical empiricism;the history of Taiwanese philosophy
    Date: 2003-07
    Issue Date: 2016-08-11 15:01:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 殷海光是台灣科學哲學研究的開山祖師。然而，由於他是台灣五六十年代爭取民主自由的標竿人物，延續了中國五四運動的反傳統氣質，以致後人對他的思想工作之研究與評價，多著落在他的政治評論、政治哲學（做為自由主義者）和文化論爭與反傳統等面向，他的科學哲學研究受到了相當程度的忽略。本文的目的正在於彌補這個缺憾。\\r我們大致可把殷海光的學術思想工作可以分成三大類：(1)邏輯與科學哲學；(2)自由主義與政治哲學；(3)中國文化與思想評論。第二和第三類還是建立在第一類的基礎上，我們可以說，沒有深入瞭解殷海光的「邏輯與科學哲學」工作，恐怕就無法對他的整體思想和歷史地位作出最貼切的研究與評價。然而，殷海光並沒有很明確自覺到「科學哲學」這個領域，從他的著作中重建他的「科學哲學」，並進行分析與評價，乃是本文的主要內容。
    Yin Hai-Kuang is the “Father” of Taiwan’s Philosophy of Science. He is a model-figure who struggled for democracy and freedom against KMT’s authoritarian ruling within 1950-1960. He inherited the counter-traditional temperament of Five-Four Movement and wrote a great many of works on political comments, liberalist philosophy of politics, and debates on Chinese culture. Those facts make his counter-traditional propensity but not other academic aspects obtain special attentions. Most of his evaluators or researchers have ignored or neglected his philosophy of science. The purpose of this paper is to compensate the deficiency. Yin’s academic works can be divided into three major parts: 1) logic and philosophy of science, 2) liberalism and philosophy of politics, 3) comments on Chinese culture and thought. The latter two are virtually based on the former. We cannot, therefore, make the best study and evaluation on Yin’s total thought and historical status without a deep understanding on his logic and philosophy of science. Yet Yin hadn’t been aware of “philosophy of science” as a new sub-discipline of philosophy. So the major content of this paper consists of a reconstruction, and followed by an analysis and an assessment, of Yin’s philosophy of science.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 10, 1-33
    The national Chengchi university philosophical
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    10-1-33.pdf663KbAdobe PDF2273View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback