|
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51580733
Online Users : 995
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100005
|
Title: | Mandarin Secondary Predicates |
Other Titles: | 漢語次要述語 |
Authors: | Shibagaki, Ryosuke |
Keywords: | 次要述語;結果式;描述式;結果描述式;非/間接/直接致使;內部/外部致使狀態改變;受影響者 secondary predicate;resultative;depictive;consequence-depictive;non-/indirect-/direct-causative;internally-/externally-caused change of state;affacted role |
Date: | 2010-06 |
Issue Date: | 2016-08-11 11:34:21 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 本文首先提出英文和中文裡(主語導向)結果描述式和(賓語導向)結果式中的(不及物動詞或形容詞)次要述語的一些語料。何(2007)的LFG/LMT研究假定兩個述語的論元結構會結合成為一個新的合成結構,因而決定一個結果句是否有致使的語意,也決定了論元與語法功能的連結。然而,本文將論證中文結果式複合詞的連結問題需要從更具解釋力的語意角度來解決,致使性的決定與兩個述語中論元的連結,都屬於語意的議題。具體來說,本文根據語意,論證兩種次要謂語的存在,一是內在致使狀態改變,另一是外在致使;它們分別是間接致使和直接致使。致使式必須區分成三類,非致使、間接致使和直接致使。本文進一步論證,當一個論元進行內部致使的變化時,常會和動作者連結,而當一個論元進行外部致使變化時,則常會和經歷者連結。 In the first part, I provide some data of secondary predicates in English and Mandarin on consequence-depictives (SUBJ-oriented) and resultatives (OBJ-oriented), which adopt an intransitive verb/adjective for their secondary predicate. In the second half, I present an account of the linking issue on “resultative” compound predicates in Mandarin Chinese, building on the LFG/LMT work of Her (2007), who assumed that the argument structures of each predicate merge to give a composite structure, which determines whether a resultative sentence is semantically causative or not, and from which the arguments link to grammatical functions. I argue here that the facts require a more articulated semantics, for unlike Her’s analysis, the determination of causativity and the linking of the arguments of the two predicates is fully an issue of semantics; specifically, I argue that there are two types of secondary predicates in terms of their semantics, namely those with internally- and externally-caused changes of state (see Levin and Rappaport Hovav: 1995, McKoon and Macfarland: 2000), which are respectively “indirect-causative” and “direct-causative”; causativity should be categorised into three types, non-causative, indirect-causative, and direct causative. I further argue that the argument undergoing internally-caused change always links to Actor and that the one undergoing externally-caused change (a truly “affected” argument) always links to Undergoer. |
Relation: | 臺灣語言學期刊, 8(1), 57-94 Taiwan Journal of Linguistics |
Data Type: | article |
DOI 連結: | http://dx.doi.org/10.6519/TJL.2010.8(1).3 |
DOI: | 10.6519/TJL.2010.8(1).3 |
Appears in Collections: | [台灣語言學期刊 THCI Core ] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
8(1)-57-94.pdf | | 2348Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 467 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.